Managing intellectual property and technology commercialization: Comparison and analysis of practices, success stories and lessons learned from public research universities in developing asia

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 478-494

  Payumo, Jane ^a   Gang, Zheng ^b   Pulumbarit, Elizabeth ^c   Jones, Keith ^a   Maredia, Karim ^a   Grimes, Howard ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES   (Philippines)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

innovation; Intellectual property; Intellectual property rights; IP; IP management; IPR; public research universities; technology commercialization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874168530     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.4.478     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, J., & Bremer, H. (2011, June 13). After Stanford v. Roche: Bayh-Dole still stands. Retrieved from http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/06/13/ after-stanford-v-roche-bayh-dole-still-stands/id=17679/
2. Association of University Technology Managers. (2011).FY2010 AUTM U.S. Licensing Activity Survey, 13. 30 Bayh-Dole - Driving Innovation. (2010). Celebrating 30 years of innovation. Retrieved from http://b-d30.org/
3. Beijing HL Consulting Co., Ltd. (2008). Market and technology of circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers in China. Beijing, China: Author.
4. Bremer, H. (2003). The Bayh-Dole act: Impact on university research and intellectual property ownership rights. Retrieved from http://www.rpitechnology.com/files/bayh_dole.pdf
5. Boettiger, S., & Bennett, A. (2006). Bayh-Dole: If we knew then what we know now. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 320-323.
6. Chakrabarti, A. K., & Lester, R. K. (2002). Regional economic development: Comparative case studies in the US and Finland. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Industrial Performance Center Local Innovation Papers 02-004, 1-14, Cambridge, MA.
7. China Education. (2008, October 29). China education news. Retrieved from http://www.jyb.cn/
8. China Research and Intelligence. (2009). Research report on Chinese solid waste disposal industry, 2009. Shanghai, China: Author.
9. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Chakrabarty. (1980). 447 U.S. 303, 206 USPQ 193 (United States Supreme Court June 16, 1980).
10. Economist Technology Quarterly. (2002). Innovation's golden goose. Retrieved from http://www.economist. com/node/1476653
11. Graff, G. D. (2007). Echoes of Bayh-Dole? A survey of IP and technology transfer policies in emerging and developing economies, Chapter 3.3. In A. Krattiger, et al. (Eds.), Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. Oxford, UK: MIHR.
12. Haryana Agricultural University. (2007). Intellectual property rights. Policy and regulations. Directorate of Human Resource Management, IPR Cell, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 1-122. Institute for Thermal Processing Engineering. (2011). http://www.ceu.zju.edu.cn
13. Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. (2011). PhilPatSearch: IPOPhil. Retrieved from http://patents. ipophil.gov.ph/PatSearch2/
14. Kavidass, S., Anderson, G., & Norton, G., Jr. (2000). Why build a circulating fludized bed boiler to generate steam and electric power (POWER-GEN Asia 2000). Bangkok, Thailand: POWER-Gen Asia 2000.
15. Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration: Final report. London, England: H M Treasury.
16. Leaf, C., & Burke, D. (2005). Law of unintended consequences- Bayh Dole was supposed to usher in an era of biotech innovation: So why are medical miracles in short supply. Fortune, 152, 250-268.
17. Lehman, B., & Garduño, E. (2004). Technology transfer is the process of transferring technological innovation and know-how developed in public research organizations to the private sector. Discussion document for the International Conference on Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property Rights and Business Policy, March, 2004, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 25-26.
18. Levenson, D. (2005). Consequences of the Bayh Dole Act. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electricalengineering- and-computer-science/6-901-inventionsand- patents-fall-2005/projects/bayh_dole.pdf
19. Maredia, K. M., Erbisch, F. H., & Sampaio, M. J. (1997). Technology transfer offices for developing countries. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 43, 15-18.
20. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology Development Center. (2010). S&T Statistics, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Development Center. Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.cn/
21. Mowery, D. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry transfer before and after Bayh-Dole. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Nelsen, L. (2004). A US perspective on technology transfer: The chaging role of university. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 5, 243-247.
23. Nelson, R. (2001). Observations on the post Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 13-19.
24. Orcutt, J., & Shen, H. (2010). China's Bayh-Dole system. In J. Orcutt & H. Shen (Eds.), Shaping china's innovative future: University technology transfer in transition. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
25. Payumo, J., & Grimes, H. (2011). Institutional responses on strengthened intellectual property rights in agriculture and needs' assessment on intellectual property management of public research institutions in asian developing countries. Journal of Research Administration, 2(2), 42-58.
26. Pulumbarit, E. R. (2011). End of term report. Manila, Philippines: UPM Intellectual Property Office
27. Sampat, B. (2006). Patenting and us academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after bayhdole. Research Policy, 35, 772-789.
28. Smith, D. F. (2006, November 16-17). The role of universities and technology commercialization in economic development. Paper at Universities, Innovation and Economic Growth Conference, Cleveland, OH.
29. State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China. (2011). Patent Search: SIPO. Retrieved from http://59.151.93.237/sipo_EN
30. Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2007). University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620-639.
31. University of the Philippines Manila. (2011). UPM Research anual. Manila, Philippines: Author.
32. Young, T. (2007). Establishing a technology transfer office, Chapter 6.2. In A. Krattiger, et al. (Eds.), Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. Oxford, England: MIHR.
33. Zhejiang University. (2009). ZJU policy for IP management. Hangzhou, China: Author.