How reliable is the attentional blink? Examining the relationships within and between attentional blink tasks over time

Psychological Research

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-105

  Dale, Gillian ^a   Arnell, Karen M ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874105313     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0403-y     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arnell, K. M., Howe, A. E., Joanisse, M. F., & Klein, R. M. (2006). Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1472-1483.
2. Arnell, K. M., & Stubitz, S. M. (2009). Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory. Psychological Research, 74, 457-467. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-009-0265-8.
3. Borgmann, K. W. U., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2007). Simon says: Reliability and the role of working memory and attentional control in the Simon task Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 313-319. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194070.
4. Colzato, S. L., Spape, M. M. A., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051-1057.
5. Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 602-606. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 3. 602.
6. Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: a review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71, 1683-1700. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 71. 8. 1683.
7. Kelly, A. J., & Dux, P. E. (2011). Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1867-1873.
8. Klein, C., Arend, I. C., Beauducel, A., & Shapiro, K. L. (2011). Individuals differ in the attentional blink: mental speed and intra-subject stability matter. Intelligence, 39, 27-35.
9. Kunsti, J., Stevenson, J., Oosterlaan, J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2001). Test-retest reliability of a new delay aversion task and executive function measures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 339-348.
10. MacLean, M. H., Arnell, K. M., & Busseri, M. (2010). Dispositional affect predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1431-1438. doi: 10. 1080/02699930903417897.
11. Martens, S., & Valchev, N. (2009). Individual differences in the attentional blink: the important role of irrelevant information. Experimental Psychology, 56, 18-26. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169. 56. 1. 1.
12. McLaughlin, E. N., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 169-196. doi: 10. 1080/02724980042000075.
13. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 979-992. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 24. 4. 979.
15. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 18. 3. 849.
16. Stolz, J. A., Besner, D., & Carr, T. H. (2005). Semantic priming is robust but unreliable: inherent noise and strategic control in the activation and evaluation of semantic knowledge. Visual Cognition, 12, 284-336.