Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 137-154

  Veltri, Giuseppe A ^a   Suerdem, Ahmet K ^b  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

actor network theory; biotechnology and culture; risk perception; social representations; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874087937     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662511423334     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bauer MTexts on Social Representations. Guareschi PAJovchelovitch S, ed. Petropolis, Brazil: Vozes; 1994:229-259.
2. Bauer MW.Arenas, platforms and the biotechnology movement.Science Communication. 2002;24:144-161.
3. Bauer MW.Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2005a;17 (1): 5-23.
4. Bauer MW.Distingushing red and green biotechnology: Cultivation effects of the elite press.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2005b;17 (1): 63-89.
5. Bauer M,Allum N,Miller S.What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:79-95.
6. Bauer MW,Gaskell G.Towards a paradigm for research on social representations.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1999;29:163-186.
7. Bauer MW,Gaskell GBiotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
8. Bauer MW,Gaskell G.Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2008;38 (4): 335-353.
9. Biel A,Dahlstrand U.Risk perception and the location of a repository for spent nuclear fuel.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 1995;36:25-36.
10. Boholm Å Risk perception and social anthropology: Critique of cultural theory.Ethnos. 1996;61 (1-2): 64-84.
11. Brun WSubjective Probability. Wright GAyton P, ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1994:295-320.
12. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Bryant JZillmann D, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994:.
13. Buǧra A,Keyder Ç.The Turkish welfare regime in transformation.Journal of European Social Policy. 2006;16 (3): 211-228.
14. Callon MPower, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. Law J, ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1986:196-223.
15. Callon M.An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social.Theory, Culture & Society. 2007;24 (7-8): 139-163.
16. Çarkoǧlu A,Yavuz G.Press-party parallelism in Turkey: An individual level interpretation.Turkish Studies. 2010;11 (4): 613-624.
17. Cohen J.Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin. 1968;70 (4): 213-220.
18. Colby BEncyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, Volume1. Levinson DEmber M, ed. New York: Henry Holt & Company; 1996:209-214.
19. Cranach M vonSocial Representations and the Social Basis of Knowledge: Volume 1. Cranach M vonDoise WMugny G, ed. Toronto and Bern: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 1992:10-22.
20. DiMaggio P.Culture and cognition.Annual Review of Sociology. 1997;23:263-287.
21. DouglasM (1978) Cultural bias. Occasional Paper no. 35, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.
22. Douglas M,Wildavsky ABRisk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982:.
23. Duveen GSocial Representation: Introductions and Explorations. Deaux KPhilogene G, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001:.
24. Farr RM.From collective to social representations: Aller et retour.Culture and Psychology. 1998;4 (3): 275-296.
25. Fereday J,Muir-Cochrane E.Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2006;5 (1): 80-92.
26. Fischoff B,Slovic P,Lichtenstein S,Read S,Combs BThe Perception of Risk. Slovic P, ed. London: Earthscan; 2000:80-104.
27. Gaskell G,Bauer M,Durant JBiotechnology in the Public Sphere: A European Source Book. Durant JBauer MGaskell G, ed. London: Science Museum Press; 1998:3-14.
28. Guest G,McLelland E.Distinguishing the trees from the forest: Applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data.Field Methods. 2003;15 (2): 186-201.
29. Habermas JThe Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; [1962] 1989:.
30. Hodge R,Kress GSocial Semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1988:.
31. Joffe H.Risk: From perception to social representation.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2003;42:55-74.
32. Keyman EF,Koyuncu B.Globalization, alternative modernities and the political economy of Turkey.Review of International Political Economy. 2005;12 (1): 105-128.
33. Latour BScience in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987:.
34. Latour B.Pasteur on lactic acid yeast: A partial semiotic analysis.Configurations. 1992;1 (1): 129-145.
35. Latour B.Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.Critical Inquiry. 2004;30 (2): 225-248.
36. Laurence S,Margolis EConcepts: Core Readings. Margolis ELaurence S, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
37. Law J.Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity.Systems Practice. 1992;5:379-393.
38. Law JActor Network and After. Law JHassard J, ed. Oxford: Sociological Review and Blackwell; 1999:1-14.
39. Loon JVRisk and Technological Culture: Towards a Sociology of Virulence. London: Routledge; 2002:.
40. Marková IDialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
41. Miller J.Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review.Daedalus. 1983;112:29-48.
42. Moscovici SHealth and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. Herzlich C, ed. London and New York: Academic Press; 1973:ix-xvi.
43. Moscovici SSocial Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2000:.
44. Moscovici SRepresentations of the Social: Bridging Theoretical Traditions. Deaux KPhilogène G, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001:8-35.
45. Moscovici S,Duveen GPsychoanalysis: Its Image and its Public. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2008:.
46. Nisbett RE,Ross LHuman Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980:.
47. Öniş ZGlobalizing Democracy: Party Politics in Emerging Democracies. Burnell P, ed. London: Routledge; 2007:122-140.
48. PeledeauN (2005) WordStat: Content Analysis Module for SIMSTAT & QDA Miner User's Guide.
49. Peters RG,Covello VT,McCallum DB.The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study.Risk Analysis. 1997;17:43-54.
50. Rouquette ML,Rateau PIntroduction à l'étude des représentations sociales. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble; 1998:.
51. Rubin BM,Heper MPolitical Parties in Turkey. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd; 2002:.
52. Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey. Sayari{dotless} SEsmer YR, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2002:.
53. Slovic P.Perceived risk, trust, and democracy.Risk Analysis. 1993;13:675-682.
54. The Perception of Risk. Slovic P, ed. London: Earthscan; 2000:.
55. Slovic P,Finucane ML,Peters E,MacGregor DG.Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.Risk Analysis. 2004;24:311-322.
56. Suerdem AKDo They Walk Like They Talk? Speech and Action in Policy Processes. Imbeau LM, ed. New York: Springer; 2009:257-275.
57. Suerdem AK.Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods for classifying policy actors into policy discourse communities: Thematic analysis and formal concept analysis approaches.International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies. 2010;2 (3): 199-216.
58. Thompson M,Ellis R,Wildavsky ABCultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1990:.
59. Wagner W.Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:7-22.
60. Wildavsky AB.Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation.American Political Science Review. 1987;81:3-21.
61. Yevtushenko SA.System of data analysis "Concept Explorer". Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence KII-2000; 2000Russia; 2000. 127.