Selecting anti-epileptic drugs: A pediatric epileptologist's view, a computer's view

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 208-215

  Pestian, J ^a   Matykiewicz, P ^a   Holland Bouley, K ^a   Standridge, S ^a   Spencer, M ^a   Glauser, T ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti epileptic drug selection; Artificial intelligence; Decision support; Epilepsy; Pediatric neurology

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMORBIDITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENETIC TRAIT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PEDIATRICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION;

ALGORITHMS; ANTICONVULSANTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 84873989913     PISSN: 00016314     EISSN: 16000404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Carroll L. Alice's adventures in wonderland; New York: Dover Publications, 1993.
2. Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis J. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary (IOM roundtable on evidence-based medicine). Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
3. Bradley CP. Decision making and prescribing patterns-a literature review. Fam Pract 1991;8:276-87.
4. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Levy SR, Testa FM, Smith-Rapaport S, Beckerman B. How well can epilepsy syndromes be identified at diagnosis? A reassessment 2 years after initial diagnosis Epilepsia 2000;41:1269-75.
5. Jallon P, Loiseau P, Loiseau J. Newly diagnosed unprovoked epileptic seizures: presentation at diagnosis in CAROLE study. Epilepsia 2001;42:464-75.
6. Camfield CS, Camfield PR, Gordon K, Wirrell E, Dooley JM. Incidence of epilepsy in childhood and adolescence: a population-based study in Nova Scotia from 1977 to 1985. Epilepsia 1996;37:19-23.
7. Hauser WA, Kurland LT. The epidemiology of epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935 through 1967. Epilepsia 1975;16:1-66.
8. Loiseau P, Duché B, Pédespan JM. Absence epilepsies. Epilepsia 1995;36:1182-6.
9. Bouma P, Westendorp R, Van Dijk J, Peters A, Brouwer O. The outcome of absence epilepsy: a meta-analysis. Neurology 1996;47:802.
10. Epilepsy A. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. The treatment of epilepsy: principles & practice. 2006; 354.
11. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia 2006;47:1094-120.
12. Callaghan N, O'Hare J, O'Driscoll D, O'Neill B, Daly M. Comparative study of ethosuximide and sodium valproate in the treatment of typical absence seizures (petit mal). Dev Med Child Neurol 1982;24:830-6.
13. Coppola G, Auricchio G, Federico R, Carotenuto M, Pascotto A. Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Epilepsia 2004;45:1049-53.
14. Martinovic Z. Comparison of ethosuximide with sodium valproate as monotherapies of absence seizures. Adv Epileptol 1983; 301.
15. Posner EB, Mohamed K, Marson AG. Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD003032.
16. Santavuori P. Absence seizures: Valproate or ethosuximide? Acta Neurol Scand 1983;68:41-8.
17. Trudeau V, Myers S, LaMoreaux L, Anhut H, Garofalo E, Ebersole J. Gabapentin in naive childhood absence epilepsy: results from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies. J Child Neurol 1996;11:470.
18. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
19. Smith R. Filling the lucana between research and practice: an inteview with Michael Peckham. Br Med J 1992;307:1403-7.
20. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. Br Med J 1995;310:1122.
21. Gardner RM, Lundsgaarde HP. Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1:428.
22. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Br Med J 2005;330:740-1.
23. Zender M, Pestain JP, Glauser TA. Visual language for representing medical concepts. Inf Des J 2010;18:184-97.
24. Alter S. A taxonomy of decision support systems. In: Decision support systems - a data-based, model-oriented, user-developed discipline; New York:Petrocelli Books, 1983. pp. 33-56.
25. Power DJ. Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview. In: Handbook on decision support systems 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008;121-40.
26. Sprague RH Jr. A framework for the development of decision support systems. MIS Quarterly 1980;4:1-26.
27. Zachary W. A cognitively based functional taxonomy of decision support techniques. Human-Computer Int 1986;2:25-63.
28. Cucina R. Information technology in patient care: introduction. In: McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, eds. Current medical diagnosis & treatment 2011. McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011;e4.
29. Ignizio JP. Introduction to expert systems: the development and implementation of rule-based expert systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
30. Pestian J, Spencer M, Matykiewicz P, Zhang K, Vinks S, Glauser T. Personalizing drug selection using advanced clinical decision support: a case study. Biomed Inform Ins 2009;2:19-29.
31. Feigenbaum EA, Feldman J. Computers and thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
32. Gan G, Ma C, Wu J. Data clustering: theory, algorithms, and applications. SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2007.
33. Datta S, Datta S. Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2003;19:459-66.
34. Rand WM. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc 1971;66:846-50.
35. Strehl A, Ghosh J. Cluster ensembles - a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. J Mach Learn Res 2003;3:583-617.
36. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.
37. Datta S, Datta S. Methods for evaluating clustering algorithms for gene expression data using a reference set of functional classes. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:397.