The Duty to Rescue in Genomic Research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 50-51

  Ulrich, Michael ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MORALITY; PERSONNEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; GENETIC RESEARCH; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 84873893800     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.754067     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Clayton, E. W. and McGuire, A. L. 2012. The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genetics in Medicine, 14: 473-477.
3. Fryer-Edwards, K. and Fullerton, S. M. 2006. Relationships with test-tubes: Where's the reciprocity?. American Journal of Bioethics, 36: 36-38.
4. Gliwa, C. and Berkman, B. E. 2013. Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?. American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2): 32-42.
5. Meltzer, L. A. 2006. Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6): 28-30.
6. Merritt, M. W., Taylor, H. A. and Mullany, L. C. 2010. Ancillary care in community-based public health intervention research. American Journal of Public Health, 100: 211-216.
7. Meyer, M. N. 2008. The kindness of strangers: The donative contract between subjects and researchers and the non-obligation to return individual results of genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(11): 44-46.
8. Richardson, H. S. and Belsky, L. 2004. The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. Hastings Center Report, 34: 25-33.
9. Wolf, S. M., Lawrenz, F. P. and Nelson, C. A. 2008. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36: 2-31.