Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 394-403

  Ortega, José Luis ^a   Aguillo, Isidro F ^b  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE HISTORIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic search engines; Google Scholar Citations; Information visualization; Network analysis; Research collaboration; Web bibliometrics

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES; TOPOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ACADEMIC SEARCH; BIBLIOMETRICS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 84873889608     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams J.D., Black G.C., Clemmons J.R., Stephan P.E. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy 2005, 34:259-285.
2. Basu A., Aggarwal R. International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics 2001, 52(3):379-394.
3. Beaver D., Rosen de B. Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 1978, 1:65-84.
4. Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37, 279-295.
5. Braun T., Glänzel W. International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive east European research?. Scientometrics 1996, 36:147-254.
6. Breedon F., Pétursson T.G., Rose A.K. Exchange rate policy in small rich economies. Open Economies Review 2012, 23(3):421-445.
7. Bush G.P., Hattery L.H. Teamwork and creativity in research. Administrative Science Quarterly 1956, 1:361-362.
8. Cassar A. Coordination and cooperation in local, random and small world networks: Experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 2007, 58(2):209-230.
9. Duhon R.J. Understanding outside collaborations of the Chinese Academy of Sciences using Jensen-Shannon divergence. Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Visualization and Data Analysis Conference, San Jose 2009, 7243, 72430C. http://www.ivl.cns.iu.edu/km/pub/2009-duhon-cas.pdf.
10. Frame J.D., Carpenter M.P. International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science 1979, 9(4):481-497.
11. Freeman L.C. Centrality in networks: I. conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1:215-239.
12. Freeman L.C. The gatekeeper, pair-dependency, and structural centrality. Quality and Quantity 1980, 14:585-592.
13. Gazni A., Sugimoto C.R., Didegah F. Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(2):323-335.
14. Glänzel W. A bibliometric approach to social sciences: National research performance in 6 selected social science areas 1990-1992. Scientometrics 1996, 35(3):291-307.
15. Glänzel W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 2001, 51:69-115.
16. Glänzel W., Debackere K., Meyer M. 'Triad' or 'tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. 9th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators 2006.
17. Guida M., Maria F. Topology of the Italian airport network: A scale-free small-world network with a fractal structure?. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2006, 31(3):527-536.
18. Heffner A.G. Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics 1981, 3:5-12.
19. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology 1933, 24:417-520.
20. Jung S., Kim S., Kahng B. Geometric fractal growth model for scale-free networks. Physical Review E 2002, 65(5):056101.
21. Katz J.S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 1994, 31:31-43.
22. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 1997, 26(1):1-18.
23. Kent M.M. More U.S. scientists and engineers are foreign-born 2011, Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2011/usforeignbornstem.aspx.
24. Kim J.S., Goh K.I., Salvi G., Oh E., Kahng B., Kim D. Fractality in complex networks: Critical and supercritical skeletons. Physical Review E 2007, 75(1):016110.
25. Kostoff R. The (scientific) wealth of nations. The Scientist 2004, 18(18):10.
26. Larivière V., Gingras Y., Archambault é. Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics 2006, 68(3):519-533.
27. Laudel G. What do we measure by co-authorships?. Research Evaluation 2002, 11(1):3-15.
28. Leydesdorff L., Wagner C. International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics 2008, 2(4):317-325.
29. Livingstone D.N. The spaces of knowledge: Contributions towards a historical geography of science. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1995, 13(1):5-34.
30. Luukkonen T., Persson O., Sivertsen G. Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, and Human Values 1992, 17(1):101-126.
31. Miquel J.F., Ojasoo T., Okubo Y., Paul A., Doré J.C. World science in 18 disciplinary areas: Comparative evaluation of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981-1992. Scientometrics 1995, 33(2):149-167.
32. Nagpaul P.S. Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics 2002, 54(2):213-228.
33. Nagtegaal L.W., De Bruin R.E. The French connection and other neo-colonial patterns in the global network of science. Research Evaluation 1994, 4:119-127.
34. Narvaez-Berthelemot N. An index to measure the international collaboration of developing countries based on the participation of national institutions: The case of Latin America. Scientometrics 1995, 34(1):37-44.
35. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 2001, 64:016132.
36. Ortega J.L., Aguillo I.F. Linking patterns in the European Union's countries: Geographical maps of the European academic web space. Journal of Information Science 2008, 34(5):705-714.
37. Ortega J.L., Aguillo I.F. Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google Scholar Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(12):2370-2377.
38. Rozenfeld H.D., Gallos L.K., Song C., Makse H.A., Meyers R.A. Fractal and transfractal scale-free networks. Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science 2009, Springer, ISBN:978-0-387-75888-6.
39. Schott T. Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world-system: Accumulation of rewards, dominance and self-reliance in the center. Journal of World-Systems Research 1998, 4:112-144.
40. Schubert A., Braun T. World flash on basic research: International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics 1990, 19:3-10.
41. Seber G.A.F. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters 2002, Blackburn Press, Caldwel, New Jersey.
42. Seidman S.B. Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks 1983, 5(3):269-287.
43. Smith M. The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist 1958, 13:596-599.
44. Solla Price D.J.de Little science, big science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York.
45. Song C., Havlin S., Makse H.A. Self-similarity of complex networks. Nature 2005, 433:392-395.
46. Wagner C.S. Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics 2005, 62(1):3-26.
47. Yang L., Morris S.A., Barden E.M. Mapping institutions and their weak ties in a specialty: A case study of cystic fibrosis body composition research. Scientometrics 2009, 79(2):421-434.