Using latent variable techniques to understand DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria functioning

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 565-574

  Hagman, Brett T ^a   Cohn, Amy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

DSM IV; IRT; Non college; Young adults

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84873871313     PISSN: 10873244     EISSN: 19457359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.37.4.14     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. White H, Labouvie E, Papadaratsakis V. Changes in substance use during the transition to adulthood: a comparison of college students and their noncollege age peers. J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):281-305.
2. Carter A, Brandon K, Goldman M. The college and noncollege experience: a review of factors that influence drinking behavior in young adulthood. J Stud Alc Drugs. 2010;71:742-750.
3. Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, et al. Mental health of college students and their non-college attending peers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(12):1429-1437.
4. Slutske W. Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college attending peers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:321-327.
5. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author; 2000.
6. American Psychiatric Association (APA). DSM-5 development: Substance-related disorders. Arlington, VA: Author. Available at: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/Substance-RelatedDisorders.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2011.
7. Keyes K, Krueger R, Hasin D. Alcohol craving and the dimensionality of alcohol use disorders. Psychol Med. 2011;41:629-640.
8. Saha T, Chou P, Grant B. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psych Med. 2006;36:931-941.
9. Beseler L, Taylor L, Leeman R. An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria and "binge" drinking in undergraduates. J Stud Alc Drugs. 2010;71:418-423.
10. Ehlke S, Hagman B, Cohn A. (in press). Modeling the dimensionality of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria in a nationally representative sample of college students. Subst Use Misuse. Status
11. Martin C, Chung T, Kirisci L, Langenbucher J. Item response theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115(4):807-814.
12. Hagman B, Cohn A. Toward DSM-V: mapping the alcohol use disorder continuum in college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;118:202-208.
13. Harford T, Muthen B. The dimensionality of alcohol abuse and dependence: a multivariate analysis of DSMIV symptom items in the national longitudinal survey of youth. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;62:150-157.
14. Embretson SE, Reise S. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers 2000.
15. Gelhorn H, Hartman C, Sakai J, et al. Toward DSMV: An item response theory analysis of the diagnostic process for DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adoles Psychiatry. 2008;47:1329-1339.
16. Shmulewitz D, Keyes K, Beseler C, et al. The dimensionality of alcohol use disorders: results from Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;111:146-154.
17. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2012). National Survey on Drug Use and Health Sample Design Report. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k9NSDUH/2k9Results.htm. Accessed September 9, 2011.
18. Hu L, Bentler P. Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle, R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1995.
19. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Modeling.1999;6:1-55.
20. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus User's Guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen 2007.
21. Scientific Software International, I. Parscale 4.1. Lincolnwood, IL: Author; 2003.
22. Saha BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler G. SUDAAN user's manual, release 7.0. Raleigh: Research Triangle Institute; 1996.
23. Mewton L, Slade T, McBride O, et al. An evaluation of the proposed DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria using Australian national data. Addiction. 2011;106:941-950.
24. Coll J, Draves P, Major M. An examination of underage drinking in a sample of private university students. Coll Stud J. 2008;42:982-985.
25. Harrell A, Karim N. Is gender relevant only for problem alcohol behaviors? An examination of correlates of alcohol use among college students. Addict Behav. 2008;33:359-365.
26. Bergen G, Shults R, Rudd R. Vital signs: alcohol impaired driving among adults-United States, 2010; MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(39):1351-1356.
27. Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;24:998-1010.
28. Hagman B, Cohn A, Noel N, Clifford P. Collateral informant assessment in alcohol use research involving college students. J Am Coll Health. 2010;59:82-90.
29. Robins L, Wing J, Wittchen H, et al. The composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI): an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen. Psychiatry. 1998;45:1069-1077.
30. Dawson D, Grant B, Stinson F, Chou P. Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol disorders among college and noncollege youth. J Stud Alc. 2004;65:47.