An evaluation of the proposed DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria using Australian national data

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 941-950

  Mewton, Louise ^a   Slade, Tim ^a   Mcbride, Orla ^b   Grove, Rachel ^a   Teesson, Maree ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Alcohol use disorder; Differential criterion functioning; DSM 5 criteria; DSM IV criteria; Item response theory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; AUSTRALIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953768564     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03340.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
2. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Development. 2010. Available at: (accessed 24 May 2010; archived by Webcite at).
3. Proudfoot H., Baillie A. J., Teesson M. The structure of alcohol dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 81: 21-6.
4. Gelhorn H., Hartman C. A., Sakai J. T., Stallings M. C., Young S. E., Rhee S. H. etal. Towards DSM-V: an item response theory analysis of the diagnostic process for DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008; 47: 1329-39.
5. Saha T. D., Chou S. P., Grant B. F. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 931-41.
6. Saha T. D., Stinson F. S., Grant B. F. The role of alcohol consumption in future classifications of alcohol use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 89: 82-92.
7. Martin C. S., Chung T., Kirisci L., Langenbucher J. W. Item response theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol 2006; 115: 807-14.
8. Langenbucher J. W., Labouvie E., Martin C. S., Sanjuan P. M., Bavly L., Kirisci L. etal. An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. J Abnorm Psychol 2004; 113: 72-80.
9. Keyes K. M., Krueger R. F., Grant B. F., Hasin D. S. Alcohol craving and the dimensionality of alcohol disorders. Psychol Med 2011; 41: 629-40.
10. Borges G., Ye Y., Bond J., Cherpitel C. J., Cremonte M., Moskalewicz J. etal. The dimensionality of alcohol use disorders and alcohol consumption in a cross-national perspective. Addiction 2010; 105: 240-54.
11. Shmulewitz D., Keyes K., Beseler C., Aharonovich E., Aivadyan C., Spivak B. etal. The dimensionality of alcohol use disorders: results from Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 111: 146-54.
12. de Bruijn C., Korzec A., Koerselman F., van Den Brink W. Craving and withdrawal as core symptoms of alcohol dependence. J Nerv Ment Dis [Comparative Study Multicenter Study Validation Studies]. 2004; 192: 494-502.
13. de Bruijn C., van den Brink W., de Graaf R., Vollebergh W. A. The three year course of alcohol use disorders in the general population: DSM-IV, ICD-10 and the Craving Withdrawal Model. Addiction 2006; 101: 385-92.
14. de Bruijn C., van den Brink W., de Graaf R., Vollebergh W. A. Alcohol abuse and dependence criteria as predictors of a chronic course of alcohol use disorders in the general population. Alcohol Alcohol 2005; 40: 441-6.
15. de Bruijn C., van den Brink W., de Graaf R., Vollebergh W. A. The Craving Withdrawal Model for alcoholism: towards the DSM-V. Improving the discriminant validity of alcohol use disorder diagnosis. Alcohol Alcohol [Comparative Study]. 2005; 40: 314-22.
16. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Development. 2010. Available at: (accessed 27 October 2010).
17. Teresi J. A. Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications. Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Med Care 2006; S152-70.
18. Teresi J. A., Fleishman J. A. Differential item functioning and health assessment. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 33-42.
19. Orlando Edelen M. O., Thissen D., Teresi J. A., Kleinman M., Ocepek-Welikson K. Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination. Med Care 2006; 44: S134-42.
20. Kahler C. W., Strong D. R. A Rasch model analysis of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence items in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30: 1165-75.
21. Hall W., Teesson M., Lynskey M., Degenhardt L. The 12-month prevalence of substance use and ICD-10 substance use disorders in Australian adults: findings from the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Addiction 1999; 94: 1541-50.
22. Teesson M., Hall W., Lynskey M., Degenhardt L. Alcohol- and drug-use disorders in Australia: implications of the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2000; 34: 206-13.
23. World Health Organization (WHO). Composite International Diagnostic Interview-version 2.0. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
24. Compton W., Saha T. D., Conway K. P., Grant B. The role of cannabis use within a dimensional approach to cannabis use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 100: 221-7.
25. Kessler R. C., McGonagle K. A., Zhao S., Nelson C. B., Hughes M., Eshleman S. etal. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8-19.
26. Kessler R. C., Ustun T. B. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2004; 13: 93-121.
27. Cottler L. B., Robins L. N., Grant B. F., Blaine J., Towle L. H., Wittchen H. U. etal. The CIDI-core substance abuse and dependence questions: cross-cultural and nosological issues. The WHO/ADAMHA Field Trial. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 653-8.
28. Wittchen H. U., Robins L. N., Cottler L. B., Sartorius N., Burke J. D., Regier D. Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The multicentre WHO/ADAMHA field trials. [erratum appears in Br J Psychiatry 1992 January;160:136]. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 645-53.
29. Andrews G., Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33: 80-8.
30. Kessler R. C., Abelson J., Demler O., Escobar J. I., Gibbon M., Guyer M. E. etal. Clinical calibration of DSM-IV diagnoses in the World Mental Health (WMH) version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMHCIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2004; 13: 122-39.
31. Janca A., Robins L. N., Cottler L. B., Early T. S. Clinical observation of assessment using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). An analysis of the CIDI Field Trials-Wave II at the St Louis site. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 160: 815-8.
32. Research Triangle Institute. Software for Survey Data Analysis (SUDAAN). Durham, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2007.
33. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS Version 9.2. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc; 2008.
34. Muthen B. O., Muthen L. K. Mplus. Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. User's Guide (V2.01). Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen; 2001.
35. Teesson M., Lynskey M., Manor B., Baillie A. The structure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 68: 255-62.
36. Bentler P. Fit indexes, Lagrange multipliers, constraint changes and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behav Res 1990; 25: 163-72.
37. Tucker L., Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1973; 38: 1-10.
38. Steiger J. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behav Res 1990; 25: 173-80.
39. Thissen D. MULTILOG User's Guide. Multiple, Categorical Item Analysis and Test Scoring Using Item Response Theory. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.; 1991.
40. Bock R. D., Aitken M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters. Psychometrika 1981; 46: 443-59.
41. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Wainer H., authors, editors. Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Parameters of Item Response Models. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.; 1993.
42. Krueger R. F., Nichol P. E., Hicks B. M., Markon K. E., Patrick C. J., Iacono W. G. etal. Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychol Assess 2004; 16: 107-19.
43. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Gerrard M. Beyond group-mean differences: the concept of item bias. Psychol Bull 1986; 99: 118-28.
44. Langer M. M., Hill C. D., Thissen D., Burwinkle T. M., Varni J. W., DeWalt D. A. Item response theory detected differential item functioning between healthy and ill children in quality-of-life measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 268-76.
45. Teresi J. A. Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Med Care 2006; 44: S39-49.
46. Teresi J. A., Kleinman M., Ocepek-Welikson K. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures. Stat Med 2000; 19: 1651-83.
47. Teresi J. A., Ocepek-Welikson K., Kleinman M., Cook K. F., Crane P. K., Gibbons L. E. etal. Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 43-68.
48. Jane J. S., Oltmanns T. F., South S. C., Turkheimer E. Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 2007; 116: 166-75.
49. Balsis S., Gleason M. E. J., Woods C. M., Oltmanns T. F. An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychol Aging 2007; 22: 171-85.
50. Harford T. C., Grant B. F., Yi H.-Y., Chen C. M. Patterns of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence criteria among adolescents and adults: results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29: 810-28.
51. Hasin D. S., Grant B. F. The co-occurrence of DSM-IV alcohol abuse in DSM-IV alcohol dependence: results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions on heterogeneity that differ by population subgroup. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 891-6.
52. Hasin D. S., Stinson F. S., Ogburn E., Grant B. F. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 830-42.
53. Grant B. F., Dawson D. A., Stinson F. S., Chou S. P., Dufour M. C., Pickering R. P. The 12-month prevalence and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1991-1992 and 2001-2002. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 74: 223-34.
54. Kessler R. C., Chiu W. T., Demler O., Merikangas K. R., Walters E. E. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication [see comment][erratum appears in Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005 July;62(7):709 Note: Merikangas, Kathleen R (added)]. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 617-27.
55. Schulte M. T., Ramo D., Brown S. A. Gender differences in factors influencing alcohol use and drinking progression among adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev 2009; 29: 535-47.
56. Wells J. E., Browne M. A., Scott K. M., McGee M. A., Baxter J., Kokaua J. etal. Prevalence, interference with life and severity of 12 month DSM-IV disorders in Te Rau Hinengaro: the New Zealand Mental Health Survey. Aust NZ J Psychiatry [Research Support, NIH, Extramural Research Support, non-US Government]. 2006; 40: 845-54.
57. Mewton L., Teesson M., Slade T. 'Youthful epidemic' or diagnostic bias? Differential item functioning of the DSM-IV cannabis use criteria in an Australian general population survey. Addict Behav 2010; 35: 408-13.
58. McBride O., Adamson G., Bunting B., McCann S. Characteristics of DSM-IV alcohol diagnostic orphans: drinking patterns, physical illness, and negative life events. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 99: 272-9.
59. Hasin D., Paykin A. Dependence symptoms but no diagnosis: diagnostic 'orphans' in a community sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 1998; 50: 19-26.
60. Wothke W. Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In: Bollen K. A., Long J. S. editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1993, p. 256-93.
61. Grewal R., Cote J., Baumgartner H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing. Mark Sci 2004; 23: 519-29.
62. Uebelacker L., Strong D., Weinstock L., Miller I. Use of item response theory to understand differential functioning of DSM-IV major depression symptoms by race, ethnicity and gender. Psychol Med 2009; 39: 591-601.
63. Keyes K., Geier T., Grant B., Hasin D. Influence of a drinking quantity and frequency measure on the prevalence and demographic correlates of DSM-IV alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009; 33: 761-71.