Entrepreneurial commercialization choices and the interaction between ipr and competition policy

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 131-151

  Gans, Joshua S ^a   Persson, Lars ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS IFN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIALIZATION; COMPETITION POLICY; ECONOMIC THEORY; ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS;

EID: 84873824199     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dts049     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderman, S. D. (2007), 'The competition law/IP 'interface': an introductory note,' in S. D. Anderman (ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy., pp. 1-34.
2. Anderman, S. D. and H. Schmidt (2007), 'EC competition policy and IPRs,' in S. D. Anderman (ed.), The Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 37-124.
3. Anton, J. J. and D. A. Yao (1994), 'Expropriation and inventions: appropriable rents in the absence of property rights,' American Economic Review, 84(1), 190-209.
4. Arora, A. (1995), 'Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how,' Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 4, 41-59.
5. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; London, UK.
6. Baumol, W. J. (2004), 'Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine,' Small Business Economics, 23(1), 9-21.
7. Bloningen, B. A. and C. T. Taylor (2000), 'R & D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: evidence from the U.S. electronic and electrical equipment industries,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47-70.
8. Boone, J. (2001), 'Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate,' International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 705-726.
9. Braunerhjelm, P. and R. Svensson (2010), 'The inventor's role: was Schumpeter right?' Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(3), 413-444.
10. Carrier, M. A. (2009), Innovation for the 21st Century. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Edmark, K. and R. Gordon (2013), 'The choice of organizational form by closely-held firms in Sweden: tax vs. non tax determinants,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 219-243.
11. Gallini, N. T. and R. A. Winter (1985), 'Licensing in the theory of innovation,' RAND Journal of Economics, 16(2), 237-252.
12. Gans, J. S. (2010), 'When is static analysis a sufficient proxy for dynamic considerations? reconsidering innovation and antitrust,' in J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, pp. 55-78.11
13. Gans, J. S. (2011), 'Negotiating for the market,' Mimeo. Melbourne Business School: Melbourne.
14. Gans, J. S., D. Hsu and S. Stern (2002), 'When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction?' RAND Journal of Economics, 33(4), 571-586.
15. Gans, J. S., D. Hsu and S. Stern (2008), 'The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence for patent grant delays,' Management Science, 54(5), 982-997.
16. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2000), 'Incumbency and R & D incentives: licensing the gale of creative destruction,' Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 485-511.
17. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2003), 'The product market and the "market for ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs,' Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
18. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2010), 'Is there a market for ideas?' Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 805-837.
19. Granstrand, O. and S. Sjölander (1990), 'The acquisition of technology and small firms by large firms,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, 367-386.
20. Hall, B. H. (1990), 'The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Special issue, pp. 85-124.
21. Haufler, A., P. J. Norbäck and L. Persson (2012), 'Entrepreneurial innovations and taxation,' IFN Working Paper No. 896, Research Institute of Industrial Economics: Stockholm.
22. Henkel, J., T. Rønde and M. Wagner (2010), 'And the winner is-acquired. Entrepreneurship as a contest with acquisitions as the prize,' Mimeo. Copenhagen Business School: Copenhagen. Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro (1987), 'R & D rivalry with licensing or imitation,' American Economic Review, 77(3), 402-420.
23. Lanjouw, J. O. and J. Lerner (2001), 'Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions,' Journal of Law &Economics, 44(2), w.
24. Lerner, J. and R. Merges (1998), 'The control of strategic alliances: an empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 125-156.
25. Lerner, J. and J. Ta°g (2013), 'Institutions and venture capital,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 153-182.
26. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1994), 'Comparing equilibria,' American Economic Review, 84(3), 441-459.
27. Norback, P. J. and L. Persson (2008), 'Entrepreneurial innovations, competition and competition policy,' European Economic Review, 56(3), 488-506.
28. Regibeau, P. and K. Rockett (2007), 'The relationship between intellectual property law and competition law: an economic approach,' in S. D. Anderman (ed.), The Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 505-552.
29. Salant, S. W. (1984), 'Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly: comment,' American Economic Review, 74(1), 247-250.
30. Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA.
31. Schankerman, M. and S. Scotchmer (2001), 'Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools,' NBER Working Papers Series no. 7086. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
32. Scotchmer, S. (2005), Innovation and Incentives. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
33. Segal, I. and M. Whinston (2007), 'Antitrust in innovative industries,' American Economic Review, 97(5), 1703-1730.
34. Sutton, J. (2002), 'Rich trades, scarce capabilities: industrial development revisited,' The Economic and Social Review, 33(1), 1-22.
35. Teece, D. J. (1987), 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy,' in D. J. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Ballinger: Cambridge, MA, pp. 185-220.