Entrepreneurial innovations, competition and competition policy

European Economic Review

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 488-506

  Norbäck, Pehr Johan ^a   Persson, Lars ^a,b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS IFN   (Sweden)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition; Competition policy; Entrepreneurial innovations

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; MERGER; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROFITABILITY; VALUATION;

EID: 84858280706     PISSN: 00142921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. Entrepreneurship, innovation and technological change. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreuneurship 2005, 1(4):149-195.
2. Aghion P., Howitt P. Endogenous Growth Theory 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P. Competition and innovation: an inverted U-relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2005, 120(2):701-728.
4. Anton J.J., Yao D.A. Expropriation and invention: appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. American Economic Review 1994, 84(1):190-209.
5. Arrow K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. The Rate and Direction of Technological Change 1962, Princeton University Press, Princeton. R. Nelsson Richard (Ed.).
6. Baumol W.J. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
7. Baumol W.J. Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics 2004, 23(1):9-21.
8. Bianchi M., Henrekson M. Is neoclassical economics still entrepreneurless?. Kyklos 2005, 58(3.).
9. Bloningen B.A., Taylor C.T. R&D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 2000, 48(1):47-70.
10. Boone J. Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2001, 19:705-726.
11. Boone J. A new way to measure competition. Economic Journal 2008, 118:1245-1261.
12. Chan, T., Nickerson, J.A., Owan, H., 2007. Strategic management of R&D pipelines with co-specialized investments and technology markets. Management Science 53, 667-682.
13. Dixit, Avinash, Joseph Stiglitz Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 1977, 67(3):297-308.
14. Farrell, Joseph, Carl Shapiro Asset ownership and market structure in oligopoly. Rand Journal of Economics 1990, 21(2):275-292.
15. Gans J.S., Stern S. Incumbency and R&D incentives: licensing the gale of creative destruction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2000, 9(4):485-511.
16. Gans J.S., Hsu D.H., Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction?. RAND Journal of Economics 2002, 33(4):571-586.
17. Gans J.S., Stern S. The product market and the market for "Ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy 2003, 32(2):333-350.
18. Gilbert .R. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: where are we in the competition-innovation debate?. Innovation Policy and the Economy 2006, vol. 6:159-215. The MIT Press.
19. Gilbert R., Newbery D.M.G. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review 1982, 72:514-526.
20. Gilbert R., Newbery D.M.G. Alternative entry paths: the build or buy decision. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 1992, 1(1):129-150.
21. Granstrand O., Sjölander S. The aquisition of technology and small firms by large firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1990, 13:367-386.
22. Grossman, Gene, Elhanan Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hall, B.H., 1990. The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1990, pp. 85-124.
24. Hall B.H., Ziedonis R.H. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-95. RAND Journal of Economics 2001, 32(1):101-128.
25. Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. American Economic Review 1996, 86:814-829.
26. Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 1999, 85(2):258-293.
27. Jehiel P., Moldovanu B. Auctions with downstream interaction among buyers. RAND Journal of Economics 2000, 31(4):768-791.
28. Kamien M.I., Tauman Y. Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1986, 472-491.
29. Katz M.L., Shapiro C. How to licence intangible property. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1986, 101(3):567-590.
30. Katz M.L., Shelanski H.A. Merger policy and innovation: must enforcement change to account for technological change?. Innovation Policy and the Economy 2005, vol. 5:109-165. The MIT Press.
31. Lerner J., Merges R. The control of strategic alliances: an empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 1998, 46:125-156.
32. Motta M. Competition Policy: Theory and Practise 2004, Cambridge University Press, UK.
33. Norbäck, P.J., Persson, L., 2006. Entrepreneurial Innovations, Competition and Competition Policy. IfN Working Paper No. 670.
34. Norbäck P.J., Persson L. The organization of the innovation industry: entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and oligopolists. Journal of the European Economic Association 2009, 7(6):1261-1290.
35. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2001 2001, OECD, OECD, Paris.
36. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Drivers of Growth: Information Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2001, OECD, OECD, Paris.
37. OECD Small and Medium Enterprise Outlook 2002, OECD, OECD, Paris.
38. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002, OECD, OECD, Paris.
39. Romer, Paul Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, XCVIII 1990, 71-102.
40. Salant S., Switzer S., Reynolds R. Losses from horizontal merger: the effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1983, 48:185-200.
41. Salop, Steven The noisy monopolist: imperfect information, price dispersion, and price discrimination. Review of Economic Studies 1977, 44(3):393-406.
42. Schumpeter J. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen, Entwicklung 1912, Duncker&Humbolt, Lipzig.
43. Segal I. Contracting with externalities. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114(2):337-388.
44. Segal I., Whinston M. Antitrust in innovative industries. American Economic Review 2007, 97(5):1703-1730.
45. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal 1987, 185-220. Cambridge (MA), Ballinger. D.J. Teece (Ed.).
46. Vickers J. Pre-emptive patenting, joint ventures, and the persistence of oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization 1985, 3:261-273.
47. Vives X. Innovation and competitive pressure. The Journal of Industrial Economics 2008, 56(3):419-469.