Automatic selection of test execution plans from a video conferencing system product line

Proceedings of the VARiability for You Workshop: Variability Modeling Made Useful for Everyone, VARY 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 32-37

  Wang, Shuai ^a   Gotlieb, Arnaud ^a   Liaaen, Marius ^b   Briand, Lionel C ^c  

^a SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

^b CISCO SYSTEMS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; AUTOMATIC SELECTION; DESIGN AND TESTS; FEATURE MODELS; LARGE COMPONENTS; NEW PRODUCT; PRODUCT-LINES; TEST CASE; TEST EXECUTION; TEST PLAN; VIDEO CONFERENCING SYSTEM;

VIDEO CONFERENCING;

EID: 84873810982     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2425415.2425422     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Cisco Systems. Cisco telepresence codec c90. data sheet. available from http://www.cisco.com. 2010.
2. David Benavides Cuevas. On the Automated Analysis of Software Product Lines Using Feature Models. PhD thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, 2007.
3. S. Oster; F. Markert; P. Ritter. Automated incremental pairwise testing of software product lines. In Software Product Line Conference(SPLC'10),2010.
4. D.R. Kuhn; D.R. Wallace; A.M. Gallo. Software fault interactions and implications for software testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 30(6):418-421, 2004.
5. A. Tevanlinna; J. Taina; R. Kauppinen. Product family testing: a survey. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 29(2):12, 2004.
6. D.M. Cohen; S.R. Dalal; M.L. Fredman; G.C. Patton. The aetg system: an approach to testing based on combinatorial design. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 23:437-444, July 1997.
7. E. Uzuncaova; D. Garcia; S. Khurshid; D.batory. Testing software product lines using incremental test generations. ISSRE. IEEE Computer Society, pages 249-258, 2008.
8. D. Benavides; S. Segura; A. R. Cortés. Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review. Information Systems, (35):615-636, 2010.
9. A. Metzger; K. Pohl; P. Heymans; P.Y. Schobbens; G. Saval. Disambiguating the documentation of variability in software product lines: A separation of concerns, formalization and automated analysis. In Requirements Engineering Conference, pages 243-253, 2007.
10. Pure systems GmbH. Variant management with pure::variants. technical white paper. available from http://web.pure-systems.com. 2006.
11. K. Czarnecki; M. Antkiewicz. Mapping features to models: A template approach based on superimposed variants. Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE), 3676:422-437, September 2005.
12. R. Rabiser; P. Grunbacher; D. Dhungana. Supporting product derivation by adapting and augmenting variability models. In Software Product Line Conference, (141-150), September 2007.
13. J. White; B. Doughtery; D. Schmidt; D. Benavides. Automated reasoning for multi-step software product-line configuration problems. In Software Product Line Conference, pages 11-20, 2009.
14. K. Czarnecki; S. Helsen; U.W. Eisenecker. Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models. Software Process : Improvement and Practice, 10(2):143-169, June 2005.
15. D. Benavides; A. Ruiz-Cortés; P. Trinidad; S. Segura. A survey on the automated analyses of feature models. In Jornadas de Ingenieréa del Software y Bases de Datos (JISBD), pages 367-376, 2006.
16. J. White; D. Benavides; D. C. Schmidt; P. Trinidad; B. Dougherty; A. Ruiz-Cortés. Automated diagnosis of feature model configurations. Joural of Systems and Software, 83(7):1094-1107, 2010.
17. K. Czarnecki; C. Kim; K. Kalleberg. Feature models are views on ontologies. In proceedings of the 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), pages 41-51, August 2006.
18. D. Beuche; H. Papajewski; W. Schröder-Preikschat. Variability management with feature models. Science of Computer Programming, 53(3):333-352, 2004.
19. M.B. Cohen; M.B. Dwyer; J. Shi. Constructing interaction test suites for highly-configurable systems in the presence of constraints: A greedy approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 34(5):633-650, July 2008.
20. G. Perrouin; S. Sen; J. Klein; B. Baudry; Y. le Traon. Automated and scalable t-wise test case generation strategies for software product lines. Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pages 459-468, 2010.
21. Pure systems GmbH. pure::variant user's guide. available from http://web.pure-systems.com. 2011.