A fitness model for scholarly impact analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 981-998

  Ke, Weimao ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Citation network; Fitness; Information visualization; Normalized citation scores; Preferential attachment; Scholarly impact

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873749462     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0787-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., Stanley, H. E. (2000a). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21), 11149-11152. http://www. pnas. org/content/97/21/11149. abstract, http://www. pnas. org/content/97/21/11149. full. pdf+html.
2. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemydagger, M., Stanley, H. E. (2000b). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11149-11152.
3. Barabási, A. L. (2009). Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science, 325, 412-413. http://www. sciencemag. org/cgi/content/full/325/5939/412.
4. Barabasi, A. L., Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
5. Bianconi, G., Barabási, A. L. (2001). Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. Europhysics Letters, 54, 436-442.
6. Börner, K., Dall'Asta, L., Ke, W., Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity, Special Issue on Understanding Complex Systems, 10(4), 58-67.
7. Burrell, Q. L. (2002). Modelling citation age data: Simple graphical methods from reliability theory. Scientometrics, 55(2), 273-285.
8. Cronin, B., Overfelt, K. (1994). Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 61-72.
9. Fekete, J. D., Grinstein, G., Plaisant, C. (2004). InfoVis 2004 contest: The history of InfoVis. http://www. cs. umd. edu/hcil/iv04contest/.
10. Fu, L. D., Aliferis, C. F. (2010). Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learing models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics, 85, 257-270. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0160-5.
11. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
12. Glanzel, W., Schubert, A. (1993). A characterization of scientometric distributions based on harmonic means. Scientometrics, 26(1), 81-96.
13. Gorraiz, J., Reimann, R., Gumpenberger, C. (2012). Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: A case study for austria and six countries. Scientometrics, 91, 417-433. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0579-3. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s11192-011-0579-3.
14. Gupta, B. M. (1997). Analysis of distribution of the age of citations in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 40(1), 139-162. doi: 10. 1007/BF02459265.
15. Ke, W., Börner, K., Viswanath, L. (2004). Major information visualization authors, papers and topics in the acm library. In INFOVIS '04: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS'04). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
16. Lee, S., Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. doi: 10. 1177/0306312705052359, http://sss. sagepub. com/content/35/5/673. abstract, http://sss. sagepub. com/content/35/5/673. full. pdf+html.
17. Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145-162.
18. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 609-641.
19. Perc, M. (2010). Growth and structure of slovenia's scientific collaboration network. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 475-482. doi: 10. 1016/j. joi. 2010. 04. 003, http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1751157710000362.
20. Peters, H. P. F., van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39-49.
21. Plaisant, C., Fekete, J., Grinstein, G. (2004). Promoting insight based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. Technical report, HCIL, University of Maryland. http://www. cs. umd. edu/hcil/pubs/tech-reports. shtml.
22. Price, D. J. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5-6), 292-306.
23. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
24. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 4(2), 131-134.
25. Robert, G., Sumner, J. (1995). Utilizing the age of references to control the exhaustivity of the reference representation in information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 31, 29-45.
26. Sikorav, J. (1991). The utility of scientific papers. Scientometrics, 21, 49-68. doi: 10. 1007/BF02019182. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/BF02019182.
27. Zhu, H., Wang, X., Zhu, J. Y. (2003). Effect of aging on network structure. Physics Review E, 68(5), 056121. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 68. 056121.
28. Zyczkowski, K. (2009). Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices. Scientometrics, 85, 301-315. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0208-6, http://arxiv. org/abs/0904. 2110.