Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices

Scientometrics

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 301-315

  Zyczkowski, Karol ^a,b  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b CENTER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Citation graph; Citations; Performance index; Weighted bibliometric indices

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955842021     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0208-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2008). Citation statistics. a report IMU-ICIAM-IMS. New York: Wiley.
2. Aksens, D. W. (2003). A marco-study of self-citations. Scientometrics, 56, 235-246.
3. Aksens, D. W. (2008). When different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms? JASIST, 59, 838-841.
4. Aksnes, D. W., & Rip, A. (2009). Researchers' perceptions of citations. Research Policy, 38, 895-905.
5. Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, T. C., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 27-34.
6. An, Y., Janssen, J., & Milios, E. E. (2004). Characterizing and mining the citation graph of the computer science literature. Knowledge & Information Systems, 6, 664-678.
7. Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69, 161-168.
8. Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interest? Scientometrics, 68, 179-189.
9. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and the prestige of scholarly journals. C& RL News, 68(5).
10. Bernstein, D. S. (2005). Matrix mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks ISDN Systems, 30, 107-117.
12. Bryan, K., & Leise, T. (2006). The $25, 000, 000, 000 eigenvector: the linear algebra behind Google. SIAM Review, 48, 569-581.
13. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google Pare Rank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 8-15.
14. Falafas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulations. Arch. Immunology Theor Exp., 56, 223-226.
15. Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2007). Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72, 427-437.
16. Frandsen, T. F. (2007). Journal self-citations-analysing the JIF mechanism. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 47-58.
17. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. New York: Wiley.
18. Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor. Current Contents, 29.
19. Glänzel, W. (2006). On h-index. A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67, 315-321.
20. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Thijs, B., & Schubert, A. (2006). A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. Scientometrics, 67, 263-277.
21. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS, 102, 16569-16572.
22. Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power?. PNAS, 104, 19193-19198.
23. Laloë, F., & Mosseri, R. (2009). Not even right, not even wrong. Europhysics News, 40(5), 27-29.
24. Langville, A. N., & Meyer, C. D. (2005). A survey of eigenvector methods for web information retrieval. SIAM Review, 47, 135-161.
25. Lehmann, S., Lautrup, B. E., & Jackson, A. D. (2003). Citation networks in high energy physics. Physical Review E 68, 026113.
26. Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing Page Rank to the citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 44, 800-810.
27. Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1979). The theory of memorization and its applications. New York: Academic Press.
28. Molinari, J. F., & Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for rating scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 75, 163-174.
29. Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74, 036104.
30. Nielsen, M. A. (2008, Dec). Lectures on the Google Technology Stack. http://michaelnielsen. org.
31. Plomp, R. (1994). The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance. Scientometrics, 29, 377-393.
32. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality in citation distribution: Towards an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 17268-1727.
33. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Markines, B., & Vespignani, A. (2009). Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Physical Review E 80, 056103.
34. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper. An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4, 131-134.
35. Schreiber, M. (2007). A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists. Annalen der Physik, 16, 640-652.
36. Schubert, A. (2007). Successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 70, 183-200.
37. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 324, 497-502.
38. Woeginger, G. J. (2008). An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56, 224-232.
39. Życzkowski, K. (2009). How to get an ERC grant? Europhysics News, 40(5), 27-29.