Constituting Identities That Challenge the Contemporary Discourse: Power, Discourse, Experience, And Emotion

Science Education

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 171-190

  Melville, Wayne ^a   Bartley, Anthony ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873746112     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21047     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aikenhead, G. (2007). Science education for everyday life. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist compatible computer use (Report No. 7). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
3. Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521-539.
4. Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Calabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The case of Miguel and the culture of power in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871-889.
6. Carlone, H. B. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of "achievement." Science Education, 87, 307-328.
7. Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
9. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (Eds.). (1999). Shaping a professional identity. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narrative in social science research. London: Sage.
12. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.
13. DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 253-269.
14. Dunn, R. G. (1997). Self, identity, and difference: Mead and the poststructuralists. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 687-705.
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
16. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume I: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.
17. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.
18. Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk. In C. Young, (Ed.), Power/knowledge (pp. 37-52). Brighton, England: Harvester.
19. Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48-79). London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.
20. Foucault, M. (1984). The subject and power. In B. Wallis, (Ed.), Art after postmodernism (pp. 417-432). Boston, MA: David R. Godine.
21. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.
22. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
23. Goodson, I. (1993). School subjects and curriculum change. London: The Falmer Press.
24. Helms, J. V. (1998). Science-and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 811-834.
25. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
26. Hodson, D. (2011). Looking towards the future. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers
27. Judson, E., & Lawson, A. E. (2007). What is the role of constructivist teachers within faculty communication networks? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 490-505.
28. Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people. London: George Allen and Unwin.
29. Layton, D. (1981). The schooling of science in England, 1854-1939. In R. MacLeod & P. Collins (Eds.), The parliament of science (pp. 188-210). Northwood, England: Science Reviews.
30. Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822-839.
31. Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93, 485-510.
32. Melville, W., & Wallace, J. (2007a). Workplace as community: Perspectives on science teachers' professional learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 543-558.
33. Melville, W., & Wallace, J. (2007b). Subject, relationships and identity: The role of a science department in the professional learning of a non-university science educated teacher. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 155-169.
34. Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.
35. Mundry, S. (2005). Changing perspectives in professional development. The Science Educator, 14, 9-15.
36. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life, history and narrative (pp. 5-24). London: Falmer.
37. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
38. Public Schools Commission (1864). Evidence of Michael Faraday, 18 November 1862. Parliamentary Papers, 4(2).
39. Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In p. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27-54). New York: Falmer Press.
40. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. Schwab and P. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34, 14-22.
42. Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. London: Routledge.
43. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
46. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72, 131-175.
47. Yager, R. E. (2005). Achieving the staff development model advocated in the national standards. The Science Educator, 14, 16-24.
48. Zembylas, M. (2003a). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 213-238.
49. Zembylas, M. (2003b). Interrogating "teacher identity": Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107-127.