Using a Process-Based Model (3-PG) to Predict and Map Hybrid Poplar Biomass Productivity in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA

Bioenergy Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 196-210

  Headlee, William L ^a   Zalesny Jr , Ronald S ^b   Donner, Deahn M ^b   Hall, Richard B ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Institute for Applied Ecosystem Studies   (United States)

Author keywords

3 PG; Geographic information system; Populus; Site quality; Yield

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; FORECASTING; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY;

3-PG; ALLOMETRIC RELATIONSHIP; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; POPULUS; PROCESS-BASED MODELING; SHORT-ROTATION WOODY CROPS; SITE QUALITY; YIELD;

BIOMASS;

BIOMASS; GIS; METEOROLOGY; MINNESOTA; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULUS; PRODUCTIVITY; WISCONSIN;

POPULUS;

EID: 84873744264     PISSN: 19391234     EISSN: 19391242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-012-9251-x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Perlack RD, Stokes BJ (2011) U. S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. ORNL/TM-2011/224. US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, p 227.
2. Goerndt ME, Mize C (2008) Short-rotation woody biomass as a crop on marginal lands in Iowa. North J Appl For 25: 82-86.
3. Stanturf JA, van Oosten C, Netzer DA, Coleman MD, Portwood CJ (2002) Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. Part A, Ch 5. In: Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J (eds) Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, pp 153-206.
4. Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Zalesny JA, McMahon BG, Berguson WE, Stanosz GR (2009) Biomass and genotype × environment interactions of Populus energy crops in the midwestern United States. BioEnerg Res 2: 106-122.
5. Kline KL, Coleman MD (2010) Woody energy crops in the southeastern United States: two centuries of practitioner experience. Biomass Bioenergy 34: 1655-1666.
6. Zalesny, RS Jr, Cunningham, MW, Hall, RB, Mirck, J, Rockwood, DL, Stanturf, JA, Volk, TA (2011) Woody biomass from short rotation energy crops, Chapter 2. In: Zhu, JY, Zhang, X, Pan, X (eds) Sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and fibers from forest biomass. ACS Symposium Series; Am Chem Soc., pp 27-63.
7. Hall, RB (2008) Woody bioenergy systems in the United States. Gen Tech Report NRS-P-31. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, p 18.
8. Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. For Ecol Manag 95: 209-228.
9. Sands, P J (2004a) 3PGpjs vsn 2. 4 - a user-friendly interface to 3-PG, the Landsberg and Waring model of forest productivity. Technical Report 140, CRC Sustainable Production Forestry, Hobart, Australia.
10. Sands, PJ (2004b) Adaptation of 3-PG to novel species: guidelines for data collection and parameter assignment. Technical Report 141, CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry, Hobart, Australia.
11. Landsberg JJ, Waring RH, Coops NC (2003) Performance of the forest productivity model 3-PG applied to a wide range of forest types. For Ecol Manag 172: 199-214.
12. Amichev BY, Johnston M, van Rees K (2010) Hybrid poplar growth in bioenergy production systems: biomass prediction with a simple process-based model (3PG). Biomass Bioenergy 34: 687-702.
13. Amichev BY, Hangs RD, van Rees K (2011) A novel approach to simulate growth of multi-stem willow in bioenergy production systems with a simple process-based model (3PG). Biomass Bioenergy 35: 473-488.
14. Aylott MJ, Casella E, Tubby I, Street NR, Smith P, Taylor G (2008) Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK. New Phytol 178: 358-370.
15. Esprey LJ, Sands PJ, Smith CW (2004) Understanding 3-PG using a sensitivity analysis. For Ecol Manag 193: 235-250.
16. Smith EA, Collette SB, Boynton TA, Lillrose T, Stevens MR, Bekker MF et al (2011) Developmental contributions to phenotypic variation in functional leaf traits within quaking aspen clones. Tree Physiol 31: 68-77.
17. Netzer, DA, Tolsted, D, Ostry, ME, Isebrands, JG, Riemenschneider, DE, Ward, KT (2002) Growth, yield, and disease resistance of 7- to 12-year-old poplar clones in the north central United States. General Technical Report NC-229. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, p 31.
18. National Renewable Energy Lab, U. S. Department of Energy. National Solar Radiation Database. http://www. nrel. gov/rredc/solar_data. html. Accessed 19 Jun 2011.
19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U. S. Department of Commerce. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) monthly summaries. http://www. ncdc. noaa. gov/oa/ncdc. html. Accessed 19 Jun 2011.
20. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey. nrcs. usda. gov. Accessed 19 Jun 2011.
21. US Department of Agriculture (1998) Soil quality resource concerns: available water capacity. Soil Quality Information Sheet prepared by the National Soil Survey Center in cooperation with the Soil Quality Institute, NRCS, USDA, and the National Soil Tilth Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA.
22. Strong T, Hansen E (1993) Hybrid poplar spacing/productivity relations in short rotation intensive culture plantations. Biomass Bioenergy 4: 255-261.
23. Rodriguez-Suarez JA, Soto B, Iglesias ML, Diaz-Fierros F (2010) Application of the 3PG forest growth model to a Eucalyptus globulus plantation in northwest Spain. Eur J For Res 129: 573-583.
24. Stape JL, Ryan MG, Binkley D (2004) Testing the utility of the 3-PG model for growth of Eucalyptus grandis × urophylla with natural and manipulated supplies of water and nutrients. For Ecol Manag 193: 219-234.
25. Mesinger F, DiMego G, Kalnay E, Mitchell K, Shafran PC, Ebisuzaki W et al (2006) North American regional reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87: 343-360.
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce. NOAA Operational Model Archive and Distribution System (NOMADS). http://www. ncdc. noaa. gov/oa/ncdc. html. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
27. Rutledge GK, Alpert J, Ebuisaki W (2006) NOMADS: a climate and weather model archive at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87: 327-341.
28. Zalesny, RS Jr, Coyle, DR, Donner, DM, Headlee, WL (2012) An approach for siting poplar energy production systems to increase productivity and associated ecosystem services. For Ecol Manag 284: 45-58. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2012. 07. 022.
29. Natural Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture. US General Soil Map (STATSGO2). http://soildatamart. nrcs. usda. gov. Accessed 28 Nov 2011.
30. Nightingale JM, Hill MJ, Phinn SR, Davies ID, Held AA, Erskine PD (2008) Use of 3-PG and 3-PGS to simulate forest growth dynamics of Australian tropical rainforests I. Parameterization and calibration for old-growth, regenerating and plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 254: 107-121.
31. Paul KI, Booth TH, Jovanovic T, Sands PJ, Morris JD (2007) Calibration of the forest growth model 3-PG to eucalypt plantations growing in low rainfall regions of Australia. For Ecol Manag 243: 237-247.
32. Xenakis G, Ray D, Mencuccini M (2008) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis from a coupled 3-PG and soil organic matter decomposition model. Ecol Model 219: 1-16.
33. Prince SD, Haskett J, Steininger M, Strand H, Wright R (2001) Net primary production of US midwest croplands from agricultural harvest yield data. Ecol Appl 11: 1194-1205.
34. Almeida AC, Landsberg JJ, Sands PJ (2004) Parameterisation of 3-PG model for fast-growing Eucalyptus grandis plantations. For Ecol Manag 193: 179-195.
35. Bauen AW, Dunnett AJ, Richter GM, Dailey AG, Aylott M, Casella E et al (2010) Modelling supply and demand of bioenergy from short rotation coppice and miscanthus in the UK. Bioresour Tech 101: 8132-8143.
36. Cundiff JS, Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Alwang J (2009) Logistic constraints in developing dedicated large-scale bioenergy systems in the southeastern United States. J Environ Eng 135: 1086-1096.
37. Haughton AJ, Bond AJ, Lovett AA, Dockerty T, Sunnenberg G, Clark SJ et al (2009) A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: a case study of perennial biomass crops. J Appl Ecol 46: 315-322.
38. van den Driessche R (1999) First-year growth response of four Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides clones to fertilizer placement and level. Can J For Res 29: 554-562.
39. DeBell DS, Clendenen GW, Harrington CA, Zasada JC (1996) Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings: 7-year results for two clones at three spacings. Biomass Bioenergy 11: 253-269.
40. Johansson T, Karacic A (2011) Increment and biomass in hybrid poplar and some practical implications. Biomass Bioenergy 35: 1925-1934.
41. Fortier J, Gagnon D, Truax B, Lambert F (2010) Biomass and volume yield after 6years in multiclonal hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips. Biomass Bioenergy 34: 1028-1040.
42. Coyle DR, Coleman MD (2005) Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation. For Ecol Manag 208: 137-152.
43. Dowell RC, Gibbins D, Rhoads JL, Pallardy SG (2009) Biomass production physiology and soil carbon dynamics in short-rotation-grown Populus deltoides and P. deltoides × P. nigra hybrids. For Ecol Manag 257: 134-142.
44. Berthelot A, Ranger J, Gelhaye D (2000) Nutrient uptake and immobilization in a short-rotation coppice stand of hybrid poplars in north-west France. For Ecol Manag 128: 167-179.
45. Cannell MGR, Sheppard LJ, Milne R (1988) Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. For 61: 125-136.
46. 2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots. New Phytol 129: 579-585.
47. Park S, Keathley DE, Han K (2008) Transcriptional profiles of the annual growth cycle in Populus deltoides. Tree Physiol 28: 321-329.
48. Dillaway DN, Kruger EL (2010) Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis: a comparison of boreal and temperate tree species along a latitudinal transect. Plant Cell Environ 33: 888-899.
49. Hozain MI, Salvucci ME, Fokar M, Holaday AS (2010) The differential response of photosynthesis to high temperature for a boreal and temperate Populus species relates to differences in Rubisco activation and Rubisco activase properties. Tree Physiol 30: 32-44.
50. Green DS, Kruger EL, Stanosz GR, Isebrands JG (2001) Light-use efficiency of native and hybrid poplar genotypes at high levels of intracanopy competition. Can J For Res 31: 1030-1037.
51. Guevara-Escobar A, Edwards WRN, Morton RH, Kemp PD, Mackay AD (2000) Tree water use and rainfall partitioning in a mature poplar-pasture system. Tree Physiol 20: 97-106.
52. 2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytol 159: 609-621.
53. Kim H, Oren R, Hinckley TM (2008) Actual and potential transpiration and carbon assimilation in an irrigated poplar plantation. Tree Physiol 28: 559-577.
54. Kochendorfer J, Castillo EG, Haas E, Oechel WC, Paw UKT (2011) Net ecosystem exchange, evapotranspiration and canopy conductance in a riparian forest. Agric For Meteorol 151: 544-553.
55. 2 enrichment of four tree species. J Exp Bot 48: 2095-2102.
56. 2 in poplar leaves. Funct Ecol 7: 669-675.
57. Matyas C, Peszlen I (1997) Effect of age on selected wood quality traits of poplar clones. Silvae Genet 46: 64-72.