The addition of a goal-based motivational interview to treatment as usual to enhance engagement and reduce dropouts in a personality disorder treatment service: Results of a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  McMurran, Mary ^a   Cox, W Miles ^b   Whitham, Diane ^c   Hedges, Lucy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drop out; Personal concerns inventory; Personality disorder; Treatment engagement; Treatment motivation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENGLAND; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84873741625     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-50     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Clough BA, Casey LM. Technological adjuncts to increase adherence to therapy: a review. Clin Psychol Rev 2011, 31:697-710.
2. Hansen NB, Lambert MJ, Forman EM. The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2002, 9:329-343.
3. McMurran M, Huband N, Overton E. Non-completion of personality disorder treatments: a systematic review of correlates, consequences, and interventions. Clin Psychol Rev 2010, 30:277-287.
4. Karterud S, Pederson G, Bjordal E, Brabrand J, Friis S, Haaseth T, Haavaldsen G, Irion T, Leirvåg H, Tørum E, Urnes T. Day treatment of people with personality disorders: experiences from a Norwegian treatment research network. J Pers Disord 2003, 17:243-262.
5. Webb D, McMurran M. A comparison of women who continue and discontinue treatment for borderline personality disorder. Pers Mental Health 2009, 3:142-149.
6. Bornovalova MA, Daughters SB. How does dialectical behaviour therapy facilitate treatment retention among individuals with comorbid borderline personality disorders and substance use disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 2007, 27:923-943.
7. Ogrodnikzuk J, Joyce AS, Piper W. Strategies for reducing patient-initiated premature termination of psychotherapy. Harvard Rev Psychiat 2005, 13:57-70.
8. Emmons RA. Striving for the sacred: personal goals, life meaning, and religion. J Soc Issues 2005, 61:731-745.
9. Michalak J, Grosse Holtforth M. Where do we go from here? The goal perspective in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2006, 13:346-365.
10. Klinger E. Conceptual framework and issues for a goals-oriented treatment perspective: A commentary on 'Where do we go from here? The goal perspective in psychotherapy'. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2006, 13:371-375.
11. Klinger E, Cox WM. Motivation and goal theory of current concerns. Handbook of Motivational Counseling 2011, 3-47. Wiley, Chichester, UK, Cox WM, Klinger E.
12. Cox WM, Klinger E. Measuring motivation: The Motivational Structure Questionnaire and Personal Concerns Inventory and their variants. Handbook of Motivational Counseling 2011, 161-204. Chichester, UK: Wiley, Cox WM, Klinger E.
13. Cox WM, Klinger E. Motivational structure: relationships with substance use and processes of change. Addict Behav 2002, 27:925-940.
14. Cox WM, Blount JP, Bair J, Hosier SG. Motivational predictors of readiness to change chronic substance abuse. Addict Res 2000, 8:121-128.
15. Theodosi E, McMurran M. Motivating convicted sex offenders into treatment: a pilot study. Brit J Forensic Pract 2006, 8:28-35.
16. McMurran M, Cox WM, Coupe S, Whitham D, Hedges L. The addition of a goal-based motivational interview to standardised treatment as usual to reduce dropouts in a service for patients with personality disorder: a feasibility study. Trials 2010, 11:98.
17. Hyler SE. Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 1994, New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
18. Drieschner KH, Boomsma A. The Treatment Engagement Rating scale (TER) for forensic outpatient treatment: description, psychometric properties, and norms. Psychol Crime Law 2008, 14:299-315.
19. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. Measuring Mental Health Needs 2001, London: Gaskell, Thornicroft G, 2.
20. Huband N, McMurran M, Evans C, Duggan C. Social problem solving plus psychoeducation for adults with personality disorder: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Brit J Psychiat 2007, 190:307-313.
21. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006, 3:77-101.
22. Publication of 2010-11 reference costs. , http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2011/11/reference-costs
23. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Asses 1999, 3(20):1-143. http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon320.pdf.
24. Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG, Smith DM, Huey J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Feusner JR. Multisite randomized controlled trials in health services research: scientific and operational issues. Med Care 2001, 39:627-634.
25. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.