Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Journal of Urology

Volumn 189, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 860-866

  Kasivisvanathan, Veeru ^a,b   Dufour, Robert ^a,b   Moore, Caroline M ^a,b   Ahmed, Hashim U ^a,b   Abd Alazeez, Mohamed ^a,b   Charman, Susan C ^c   Freeman, Alex ^d   Allen, Clare ^d   Kirkham, Alex ^d   Van Der Meulen, Jan ^c   Emberton, Mark ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; risk

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TRANSPERINEAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TARGETED BIOPSY; TRANSPERINEAL TEMPLATE PROSTATE BIOPSY;

BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PERINEUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84873736746     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P. Nevoux, A. Ouzzane, H.U. Ahmed Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series BJU Int 110 2011 517
2. Y. Hu, H.U. Ahmed, T. Carter A biopsy simulation study to assess the accuracy of several transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-biopsy strategies compared with template prostate mapping biopsies in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy BJU Int 110 2012 812
3. G. Onik, M. Miessau, D.G. Bostwick Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4321
4. H.U. Ahmed, A. Kirkham, M. Arya Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6 2009 197
5. P. Rouse, G. Shaw, H.U. Ahmed Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study Urol Int 87 2011 49
6. P. Puech, E. Potiron, L. Lemaitre Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 74 2009 1094
7. A. Villers, P. Puech, D. Mouton Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings J Urol 176 2006 2432
8. N.M. deSouza, S.F. Riches, N.J. Vanas Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer Clin Radiol 63 2008 774
9. A. Tanimoto, J. Nakashima, H. Kohno Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 25 2007 146
10. C.M. Moore, N.L. Robertson, N. Arsanious Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 2013 125
11. A.B. Barqawi, K.O. Rove, S. Gholizadeh The role of 3-dimensional mapping biopsy in decision making for treatment of apparent early stage prostate cancer J Urol 186 2011 80
12. P.M. Bossuyt, J.B. Reitsma, D.E. Bruns Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative Clin Radiol 58 2003 575
13. W.E. Barzell, M.R. Melamed Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate-a 4-year experience Urology 70 2007 27
14. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, C. Allen Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477
15. H.U. Ahmed, Y. Hu, T. Carter Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy J Urol 186 2011 458
16. T.A. Stamey, F.S. Freiha, J.E. McNeal Localized prostate cancer Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer Cancer 71 1993 933
17. Y. Goto, M. Ohori, A. Arakawa Distinguishing clinically important from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies J Urol 156 1996 1059
18. P. Harnden, B. Naylor, M.D. Shelley The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: what are the risks of progression? A systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer 112 2008 971
19. C.M. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, T. Hambrock Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 2011 46
20. S. Natarajan, L.S. Marks, D.J. Margolis Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system Urol Oncol 29 2011 334
21. J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection BJU Int 108 2011 E171
22. P.A. Pinto, P.H. Chung, A.R. Rastinehad Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 186 2011 1281
23. S.H. Lee, M.S. Chung, B.H. Chung Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsies J Endourol 26 2011 787
24. A. Sciarra, V. Panebianco, M. Ciccariello Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy Clin Cancer Res 16 2010 1875
25. A.P. Labanaris, K. Engelhard, V. Zugor Prostate cancer detection using an extended prostate biopsy schema in combination with additional targeted cores from suspicious images in conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13 2010 65
26. A. Prando, J. Kurhanewicz, A.P. Borges Prostatic biopsy directed with endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging findings in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and prior negative biopsy findings: early experience Radiology 236 2005 903
27. T. Hambrock, D.M. Somford, C. Hoeks Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen J Urol 183 2010 520
28. B.A. Hadaschik, T.H. Kuru, C. Tulea A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion J Urol 186 2011 2214
29. T. Miyagawa, S. Ishikawa, T. Kimura Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data Int J Urol 17 2010 855
30. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Peyromaure, A. Schull Pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and MRI-targeted biopsies using three different techniques of MRI-TRUS image registration J Urol 186 2012 1818