Decision making in pediatric oncology: Evaluation and incorporation of patient and parent preferences

Pediatric Blood and Cancer

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 558-563

  Sung, Lillian ^a   Regier, Dean A ^b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision making; Oncology; Pediatrics

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACUTE GRANULOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH STATUS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; PARENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; INFECTION CONTROL; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEUTROPENIA; PARENTS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PEDIATRICS;

EID: 84873732257     PISSN: 15455009     EISSN: 15455017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24450     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 345-354.
2. Blank T, Graves K, Sepucha K, et al. Understanding treatment decision making: Contexts, commonalities, complexities, and challenges. Ann Behav Med 2006; 32: 211-217.
3. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453-458.
4. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003; 58: 697-720.
5. Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
6. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA 1993; 270: 72-76.
7. Redelmeier DA, Koehler DJ, Liberman V, et al. Probability judgement in medicine: Discounting unspecified possibilities. Med Decis Making 1995; 15: 227-230.
8. Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt IS. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: By what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J Health Serv Res Policy 1998; 3: 100-107.
9. Dolan P, Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Econ J 2008; 118: 215-234.
10. Swait J, Adamowicz W. The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching. J Consum Res 2001; 28: 135-148.
11. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ 2002; 324: 1350.
12. Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 2009; 64: 669-677.
13. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patients' health-care decision making: A framework for descriptive and experimental investigations. Med Decis Making 1995; 15: 101-106.
14. Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR. Microeconomic theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
15. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995.
16. Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgement. Psych Rev 1927; 21: 721-735.
17. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974. pp. 105-142.
18. Marschak J. Binary choice constraints on random utility indicators. In: Arro KJ, Karlin S, Suppes P, editors. Mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford, CA: Standord University Press; 1960.
19. Plous S. Descriptive models of decision making. In: Zimbardo PG, editor. The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1993. pp. 94-105.
20. Plous S. The representativeness heuristic. In: Zimbardo PG, editor. The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1993. pp. 109-120.
21. Guyatt GH, Sinclair J, Cook DJ, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and the Cochrane Applicability Methods Working Group. JAMA 1999; 281: 1836-1843.
22. Briggs A, Schulpher M, Claxton K. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
23. Basu A. Economics of individualization in comparative effectiveness research and a basis for a patient-centered health care. J Health Econ 2011; 30: 549-559.
24. Sung L, Buckstein R, Doyle JJ, et al. Treatment options for patients with acute myeloid leukemia with a matched sibling donor: A decision analysis. Cancer 2003; 97: 592-600.
25. Sung L, Zaoutis T, Ullrich N, et al. Children's Oncology Group's 2012 Blueprint for Research: Cancer control and supportive care. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; (in press).
26. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment options. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29: 45-64.
27. Tomlinson D, Bartels U, Gammon J, et al. Chemotherapy versus supportive care alone in pediatric palliative care for cancer: Comparing the preferences of parents and health care professionals. CMAJ 2011; 183: E1252-E1258.
28. Tomlinson D, Bartels U, Hendershot E, et al. Factors affecting treatment choices in paediatric palliative care: Comparing parents and health professionals. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 2182-2187.
29. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530-1533.
30. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 1966; 74: 132-157.
31. Regier DA, Ryan M, Phimister E, et al. Bayesian and classical estimation of mixed logit: An application to genetic testing. J Health Econ 2009; 28: 598-610.
32. Sung L, Alibhai SM, Ethier MC, et al. Discrete choice experiment produced estimates of acceptable risks of therapeutic options in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. J Clin Epidemiol 2012; 65: 627-634.