Factors affecting the amount of effort expended in responding to questions in behavioural choice experiments

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 216-236

  Bonsall, Peter ^a   Lythgoe, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Complexity; Effort; Error; Latency; Need for cognition; Tolerance of ambiguity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873727751     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70011-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bettman, J., Johnson, E.J. and Payne, J.W. (1990) A component analysis of cognitive effort in choice, Organizational Behaviour and Decision Processes, 45 111-139.
2. Blair, W., Jarvis, G. and Petty, R.E. (1996) The Need to Evaluate, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172-194.
3. Bonsall, P.W. (2002) Motivating the respondent: how far should you go? In Mahmassani (ed.) In perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Applications Challenges, Pergamon.
4. Bonsall, P.W., Shires, J., Maule, J., Matthews, B. and Beale J. (2007a) Responses to complex pricing signals: theory, evidence and implications for road pricing, Transportation Research Part A, 41(7), 672-683. (Pubitemid 46444654)
5. Bonsall P.W., Shires, J., Link, H., Becker, A. Papaioannou, P. and Xanthopoulos, P. (2007b) Complex congestion charging - an assessment of motorists' comprehension and the impact on their driving behaviour, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Nordwijk, October 2007, PTRC.
6. Budner, S. (1962) Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable, Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
7. Cacioppo, J.T. and Petty, R.E. (1982) The need for cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8. Espinoza-Varas, B and Watson, C.S. (1994) Effects of decision criterion on response latencies in binary decisions, Percept Psychopys, 55(2), 190-203.
9. Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W. and Wedel, M. (2000) Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 376-382.
10. Lamberton, B., Fedorowitz, J. and Roohani, S.J. (2005) Tolerance for ambiguity and IT competence among accountants, Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 75-95.
11. Newall, A. and Simon, H.A. (1972) Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.
12. Onken, J., Hastie, R. and Revelle, W. (1985) Individual differences in the use of simplification strategies in a complex decision-making task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(1), 14-27.
13. Pollay, R.W. (1970a) A model of decision times in difficult decision situations, Psychological Review, 77(4), 273-281.
14. Pollay, R.W. (1970b) The structure of executive decisions and decision times. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(4), 249-260.
15. Ratcliff R and Rouder, J.N. (1998) Modelling response times for two-choice decisions, Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
16. Rose, J.M. and Black, I.A. (2006) Means matter but variances matter too: decomposing response latency influences on variance heterogeneity in stated preference experiments, Market Letters, 17, 295-310. (Pubitemid 44199896)
17. Schade, J. and Schlag, B. (2003) Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 45-61. (Pubitemid 36742406)
18. Rößger, L., Schade, J., Obst, D., Gehlert, T., Schlag, B., Bonsall, P. and Lythgoe, W. (2008) Psychological constraints of user reactions towards differentiated charging, Deliverable 4.2 of the DIFFERENT project, University of Edinburgh Napier.
19. Wise, P.M. and Cain, W.S. (2000) Latency and accuracy of discriminations of odor quality between binary mixtures and their components, Chemical Senses, 25(3), 247-265.