Making group assessment transparent: What wikis can contribute to collaborative projects

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 198-210

  Caple, Helen ^a   Bogle, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

group assessment; network literacies; tertiary education; wikis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873692999     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.618879     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Albors, J., Ramos, J.C. and Hervas, J.L. 2008. New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source. International Journal of Information Management, 28: 194-202.
2. Biggs, J.B. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32: 347-364.
3. Burdett, J. 2003. Making groups work: University students' perceptions. International Education Journal, 4(3): 177-191.
4. Collis, C. 2006. The Brisbane media map: Connecting students, industry, and university through authentic learning. 7th international information technology based higher education and training conference, July 10-13, in UTS, Sydney.http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4718/
5. Cormier, D. 2008. Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate 4, no. 5.http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=550
6. Downes, S. 2007. What connection is. Half an hour blog.http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
7. Graduate Attributes. 2003. UNSW academic board.http://www.secretariat.unsw.edu.au/acboard/approved_policy/graduate_attributes.pdf
8. Hirst, M. 2011. News 2.0: Can journalism survive the Internet?, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
9. Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowd sourcing. Wired, 14(6) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html?pg=1&topic=crowds&topic_set=
10. James, R., C. McInnes, and M. Devlin. 2002. Assessing learning in Australian Universities: Ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Centre for the Study of Higher Education: University of Melbourne.
11. Lejk, M., Wyvill, M. and Farrow, S. 1996. A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3): 267-278.
12. Leki, I. 2001. A narrow thinking system: Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1): 39-67.
13. McCorkle, D.E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J.F., Kling, N.D., Harris, R.C. and Vishwanathan Iyer, R. 1999. Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly?. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(2): 106-117.
14. O'Reilly T. 2005. What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software,http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
15. Orr, S. 2010. Collaborating or fighting for the marks? Students' experiences of group work assessment in the creative arts. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3): 301-313.
16. Pieterse, V. and Thompson, L. 2010. Academic alignment to reduce the presence of 'social loafers' and 'diligent isolates' in student teams. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(4): 355-367.
17. Rheingold, H. 2009. Null literacies. Lecture presented to Reboot Britain, London.http://howardrheingold.blip.tv/file/2373937
18. Sharp, S. 2006. Deriving individual student marks from a tutor's assessment of group mark. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3): 329-343.
19. Siemens, G. 2008. What is connectivisim?http://elearnspace.org/media/WhatIsConnectivism/player.html
20. Strauss, P. and U, A. 2007. Group assessment: Dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2): 147-161.
21. Volet, S. and Mansfield, C. 2006. Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4): 341-356.
22. Young, C.B. and Henquinet, J.A. 2000. A conceptual framework for designing group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 76(1): 56-60.