Modeling complicated rheological behaviors in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated microbubbles accounting for nonlinear changes of both shell viscosity and elasticity

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 985-998

  Li, Qian ^a   Matula, Thomas J ^b   Tu, Juan ^a   Guo, Xiasheng ^a   Zhang, Dong ^a,c  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF ACOUSTICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUBBLE RADIUS; COMPARISON RESULT; CURRENT MODELS; MICROBUBBLES; MODEL SIMULATION; NONLINEAR CHANGES; OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; SHEAR-THINNING; SHELL ELASTICITY; STRAIN-SOFTENING; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT; VISCOUS COEFFICIENTS;

BUBBLES (IN FLUIDS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ELASTICITY; RHEOLOGY; VISCOSITY;

SHELLS (STRUCTURES);

CONTRAST MEDIUM; LIPID;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW KINETICS; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; MICROBUBBLE; OPTICS; RADIATION SCATTERING; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; VISCOSITY;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LIGHT; LIPIDS; MICROBUBBLES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; RHEOLOGY; SCATTERING, RADIATION; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISCOSITY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873679953     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/985     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chatterjee D and Sarkar K 2003 A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 1749-57
2. Church C C 1995 The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1510-21
3. de Jong N, Cornet R and Lancee C T 1994a Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres: part 1. Simulation Ultrasonics 32 447-53
4. de Jong N, Cornet R and Lancee C T 1994b Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres: part 2. Measurements Ultrasonics 32 455-9
5. de Jong N, Emmer M, Chin C T, Bouakaz A, Mastik F, Lohse D and Versluis M 2007 'Compression-only' behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 653-6
6. de Jong N and Hoff L 1993 Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres Ultrasonics 31 175-81
7. Doinikov A A and Bouakaz A 2011 Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 58 981-93
8. Doinikov A A and Dayton P A 2007 Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 3331-40
9. Doinikov A A, Haac J F and Dayton P A 2009 Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles Ultrasonics 49 269-75
10. Ferrara K, Pollard R and Borden M 2007 Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamental and application to gene and drug delivery Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 415-47
11. Frinking P J A and de Jong N 1998 Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24 523-33
12. Goldberg B, Raichlen J S and Forsberg F 2001 Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (London: Martin Dunitz)
13. Gorce M, Arditi M and Schneider M 2000 Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents. A study of SonoVue Invest. Radiol. 35 661-71
14. Guan J F and Matula T J 2004 Using light-scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 2832-42
15. Hoff L 2001 Acoustic Characterization of Contrast Agents for Medical Ultrasound Imaging (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
16. Kennedy J E 2005 High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours Nature Rev. Cancer 5 321-7
17. Marmottant P, van der Meer S, Emmer M, Versluis M, de Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S and Lohse D 2005 A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 3499-505
18. Mitragotri S 2005 Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 4 255-60
19. Morgan K E, Allen J S, Dayton P A, Kibaov A L and Ferrara K W 2000 Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 47 1494-508
20. Paul S, Katiyar A, Sarkar K, Chatterjee D, Shi W T and Forsberg F 2010 Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial model J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 3846-57
21. Plesset M S 1949 The dynamics of cavitation bubbles Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 16 277-82
22. Qin S and Ferrara K W 2010 A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128 1511-21
23. Rayleigh L 1917 On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity Phil. Mag. 34 94-8
24. Stride E P and Coussios C C 2010 Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 224 171-91
25. Tsiglifis K and Pelekasis N A 2008 Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123 4059-70
26. Tu J, Guan J F, Qiu Y Y and Matula T J 2009 Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue® microbubbles using light scattering J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126 2954-62
27. van der Meer S M, Dollet B, Voormolen M M, Chin C T, Bouakaz A, de Jong N, Versluis M and Lohse D 2007 Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 648-56
28. Zhao S, Borden M, Bloch S, Kruse D, Ferrara K and Dayton P 2004 Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging Mol. Imaging 3 135-48