Validation of methods for the detection and quantification of engineered nanoparticles in food

Food Chemistry

Volumn 138, Issue 2-3, 2013, Pages 1959-1966

  Linsinger, T P J ^a   Chaudhry, Q ^b   Dehalu, V ^c   Delahaut, P ^c   Dudkiewicz, A ^b   Grombe, R ^a   Von Der Kammer, F ^d   Larsen, E H ^e   Legros, S ^d   Loeschner, K ^e   Peters, R ^f   Ramsch, R ^g   Roebben, G ^a   Tiede, K ^b   Weigel, S ^f  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^c CER Groupe   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Complex matrices; Nanomaterials; Number concentration; Particle size distribution; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; CHEMICAL IDENTITY; COMPLEX MATRICES; DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATIONS; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; FOOD SAMPLES; GENERIC APPROACH; HUMAN HEALTH; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; NUMBER CONCENTRATION; PARTICLE NUMBER CONCENTRATION; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; VALIDATION DATA; WORKING RANGE;

CHEMICAL DETECTION; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FOOD ANALYSIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LIGHT SCATTERING; MEASUREMENT; NANOENGINEERING; PARTICLE SIZE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VALIDATION STUDY;

FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; NANOPARTICLES;

EID: 84873675523     PISSN: 03088146     EISSN: 18737072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.074     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BASF (2006). < http://www.basf.com.mx/humannutrition/pdfs/HNCAR-60- 012006.pdf >.
2. Q. Chaudhry, M. Scotter, J. Blackburn, B. Ross, A. Boxall, and L. Castle Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A: Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment 25 2008 241 258
3. S. Dekkers, P. Krystek, R.J.B. Peters, D.B.K. Lankveld, B.G.H. Bokkers, and P.H. van Hoeven-Arentzen Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products Nanotoxicology 5 2011 393 405
4. EFSA Scientific Committee Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain EFSA Journal 9 5 2011 2140
5. European Commission. (2002). Commission decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing council directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results.
6. European Commission. (2011). Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU).
7. European Union. (2009). Regulation 1223/2009 EC of the European Parliament and of the council on cosmetic products.
8. European Union. (2011). Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending regulations.
9. A. García, S. Eceolaza, M. Iriarte, C. Uriarte, and A. Etxeberria Barrier character improvement of an amorphous polyamide (Trogamid) by the addition of a nanoclay Journal of Membrane Science 301 2007 190 199
10. Holcombe, D.; (Ed.). (1998). The fitness for purpose of analytical methods-A laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. Teddington (UK): LGC. ISBN 0-948926-12-0. < http://www.eurachem.org/guides/pdf/valid.pdf >.
11. International Organization for Standardization. (2001). ISO 13318-1 Determination of particle size distribution by centrifugal liquid sedimentation methods-Part 1: General principles and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
12. International Organization for Standardization. (2004). ISO 13322-1:2004 Particle size analysis-Image analysis methods-Part 1: Static image analysis method. Geneva: ISO.
13. International Organization for Standardization. (2008). ISO/TS 27687 Nanotechnologies-Terminology and definitions for nano-objects-Nanoparticles, nanofibres and nanoplates. Geneva: ISO.
14. International Organization for Standardization. (2008b). ISO 22412. Particle size analysis-Dynamic light scattering (DLS), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
15. International Organization for Standardization. (2008c). ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement-Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
16. IUPAC. (2006). IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology (2nd ed.) (the "Gold Book"). Compiled by A. D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1997). XML on-line corrected version: http://goldbook.iupac.org created by M. Nic, J. Jirat, B. Kosata; updates compiled by A. Jenkins. ISBN 0-9678550-9-8. doi:10.1351/goldbook.
17. R. Koeber, H. Emons, and T.P.J. Linsinger An approach for more precise statements of metrological traceability on reference material certificates Accreditation and Quality Assurance 15 2010 255 262 10.1007/s00769-010-0644-2
18. Loevestam, G.; Rauscher, H.; Roebben, G.; Sokull-Kluettgen, B.; Gibson, P.; & Putaud, J.; et al. (2010). Considerations on a definition of nanomaterial for regulatory purposes. EUR 24403 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union. JRC58726.
19. R.L. Plackett, and J.P. Burmann The design of optimal multifactorial experiments Biometrika 33 1946 305 325
20. G. Roebben, A. Lamberty, T. Linsinger, and H. Emons Metrological traceability of the measured values of properties of engineering materials Metrologia 47 2010 S23 S31
21. M. Thompson, S.L.R. Ellison, and R. Wood Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report) Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 2002 835 855
22. J. Turner, V.B. Golovko, O.P.H. Vaughan, P. Abdulkin, A. Berenguer-Murcia, and M.S. Tikhov Selective oxidation with dioxygen by gold nanoparticle catalysts derived from 55-atom clusters Nature 454 2008 981 983
23. M. Wadman Path to approval proves rocky for copycat biodrugs Nature 438 2005 154 155