Evolution of Urban Design Plans in the United States and Canada: What Do the Plans Tell Us about Urban Design Practice?

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 66-82

  Linovski, Orly ^a   Loukaitou Sideris, Anastasia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

design practice; urban design plans; urban form

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873648652     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X12454174     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barnett J.Urban design as public policy: Practical methods for improving cities. New York: Architectural Record Books; 1974:.
2. Berke P. R.,Backhurst M.,Laurian L.,Dixon J.What makes plan implementation sucessful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2006;33 (4): 581-600.
3. Carmona M.Residential design policy and guidance: Content, analytical basis, presecription and regional emphasis.Planning Practice & Research. 1999;14 (1): 17-38.
4. Carmona M.English design policies: How have they fared?.Environment and Planning B. 2003;30:911-31.
5. Carmona M.Companion to urban design. Banerjee T.Loukaitou-Sideris A., ed. London: Routledge; 2011:.
6. Cooper Marcus C.Cross cultural research in environment and behavior. Ittelson W.Asai M.Kerr M., ed. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press; 1986:56-83.
7. Cuthbert A.The form of cities: Political economy and urban design. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006:.
8. Cuthbert A.Urban design: Requiem for an era-Review and critique of the last 50 years.Urban Design International. 2007;12:127-233.
9. Cuthbert A.Companion to urban design. Banerjee T.Loukaitou-Sideris A., ed. London: Routledge; 2011a:84-96.
10. Cuthbert A.Understanding cities. London: Routledge; 2011b:.
11. Donovan J.Rethinking design guidance.Planning Practice and Research. 1996;11 (3): 303-18.
12. Faludi A.The performance of spatial planning.Planning Practice & Research. 2000;15 (4): 299-318.
13. George R. V.,Caton Campbell M.Balancing different interests in aesthetic controls.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;20:163-75.
14. Gospodini A.European cities in competition and the new "uses" of urban design.Journal of Urban Design. 2002;7 (1): 59-73.
15. Habe R.Public design control in American communities: Design guidelines/design review.Town Planning Review. 1989;60 (2): 195-219.
16. Urban design. Krieger A.Saunders W. S., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2009:113-130.
17. Krieger M.Companion to urban design. Banerjee T.Loukaitou-Sideris A., ed. London: Routledge; 2011:238-48.
18. Kumar S.Canadian urban design practice: A review of urban design regulations.Canadian Journal of Urban Research. 2002;11 (2): 239-63.
19. Kumar S.Information in design review.Planning Practice and Research. 2003;18 (4): 243-63.
20. Lightner B. C.Design review: A critical evaluation. Cities. 1992;9 (4): 280-87.
21. Lang J.Urban design: A typology of procedures and products. London: Elsevier; 2006:.
22. Loukaitou-Sideris A.,Banerjee T.Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998:.
23. Loukaitou-Sideris A.Cracks in the city: Addressing the constraints and potentials of urban design.Journal of Urban Design. 1996;1 (1): 91-104.
24. Loukaitou-Sideris A.Addressing the challenges of urban landscapes: Normative goals for urban design.Journal of Urban Design. 2012;17 (4): 467-84.
25. Madanipour A.Companion to urban design. Banerjee T.Loukaitou-Sideris A., ed. London: Routledge; 2011:484-94.
26. Marshall R.Urban design. Krieger A.Saunders W. S., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2009:38-57.
27. Mera K.Consumer sovereignity in urban design.Town Planning Review. 1967;37 (4): 305-12.
28. Nasar J. L.,Grannis P.Design review reviewed.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65 (4): 424-33.
29. Norton R. K.Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes.Land Use Policy. 2008;25 (3): 432-54.
30. Oliveira V.,Pinho P.Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects.Journal of Planning Literature. 2010;24 (4): 343-61.
31. Punter J.Design guidelines in American cities: A review of design policies and guidance in five West Coast cities. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press; 1999:.
32. Punter J.Urban design as public policy: Evaluating the design dimension of Vancouver's planning system.International Planning System. 2002;7 (4): 265-82.
33. Punter J.Developing urban design as public policy: Best practice principles for design review and development management.Journal of Urban Design. 2007;12 (2): 167-202.
34. Punter J.,Carmona M.Design policies in local plans: Recommendations for good practice.Town Planning Review. 1997a;68 (2): 165-93.
35. Punter J.,Carmona M.Design policies in local plans: Recommendations for good practice.Town Planning Review. 1997b;68 (2): 165-93.
36. Punter J.,Carmona M.,Platts A.The design content of development plans.Planning Practice and Research. 1994;9 (3): 199-220.
37. Sampson R. J.,Roudenbush S. W.Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods.American Journal of Sociology. 1999;105:603-651.
38. Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. Scheer B. C.Preiser W. F. E., ed. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1994a:.
39. Scheer B. C.,Preiser W. F. E.Introduction: Special issue on design review.Environment and Behavior. 1994b;26 (3): 307-11.
40. Schuster J. M.The role of design review in affecting the quality of urban design: The architect's point of view.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 1997;14 (3): 209-25.
41. Sorkin M.The end(s) of urban design.Harvard Design Magazine. 2006;25:5-18.
42. Southworth M.Theory and practice of contemporary urban design: A review of urban design plans in the United States.Town Planning Review. 1989;60 (4): 369-402.
43. Southworth M.,Southworth S.Environmental quality in cities and regions: A review of analysis and management of environmental quality in the United States.Town Planning Review. 1973;44 (3): 231-53.
44. Talen E.After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1996a;16 (2): 79.
45. Talen E.Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning.Journal of Planning Literature. 1996b;10 (3): 248.