Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study

ISMAR 2012 - 11th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2012, Science and Technology Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 247-255

  Haugstvedt, Anne Cecilie ^a   Krogstie, John ^b  

^a ACCENTURE   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems : Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities Evaluation methodology

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE MODELS; CULTURAL HERITAGES; DESIGN-SCIENCE RESEARCHES; DIRECT IMPACT; EVALUATION/METHODOLOGY; EXTENDED VERSIONS; HISTORICAL STREETS; INTENTION TO USE; MOBILE AUGMENTED REALITY; PERCEIVED ENJOYMENT; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USABILITY DESIGN; VIDEO DEMONSTRATION; WEB SURVEYS;

AUGMENTED REALITY; DESIGN; PHOTOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84873545391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402563     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. S. Andresen, J. Krogstie, and T. Jelle. Lab and research activities at wireless Trondheim. In 4.th IEEE International Symposium onWireless Communication Systems (ISWCS'07). NTNU, Trondheim Norway, 2007.
2. F. M. Andrews. Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(2):409-442, 1984.
3. R. Azuma, M. Billinghurst, and G. Klinker. Special section on mobile augmented reality. Computer and Graphics, 35:vii-viii, 2011.
4. M. Billinghurst and A. Dünser. Augmented reality in the classroom. IEEE Computer, 45(7):56-63, 2012.
5. D. Boyer and J. Marcus. Implementing mobile augmented reality applications for cultural institutions. In J. Trant and D. Bearman, editors, Museums and the Web 2011: Proceedings (MW2011), Toronto, Canada, 2011.
6. B. Butchart. Augmented reality for smartphones. Technical report, JISC Observatory, 2011.
7. M. K. Chang andW. Cheung. Determinants of the intention to use internet/www at work: a confirmatory study. Information and Management, 39(1):1-14, 2001.
8. T. Chesney. An acceptance model for useful and fun information systems. Human Technology, 2(2):225235, 2006.
9. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14):1111-1132, 1992.
10. S. Gao and J. Krogstie. Explaining the adoption of mobile information services from a cultural perspective. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB 2011), pages 15-18, 2011.
11. S. Gao, J. Krogstie, and K. Siau. Developing an instrument to measure the adoption of mobile services. International Journal on Mobile Information Systems, 7(1):45-67, 2011.
12. J. D. Gould and C. Lewis. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3):300-311, 1985.
13. I. Ha, Y. Yoon, and M. Choi. Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information and Management, 44(3):276-286, 2007.
14. L. Hella and J. Krogstie. Personalisation by semantic web technology in food shopping. In Proceedings of WIMS 2011, 2011.
15. A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1):75-105, 2004.
16. S. Holm. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, (6):95-100, 1979.
17. M. Ibrahim. Utvikling og evaluering av ulike mobile, lokasjonsbaserte tjenester (in Norwegian). Technical report, IDI, NTNU, 2008.
18. M. Igbaria, J. Iivari, and H. Maragahh. Why do individuals use computer technology? a Finnish case study. Information and Management, 29(5):227-238, 1995.
19. M. Igbaria, S. Parasuraman, and J. J. Baroudi. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1):127-143, 1996.
20. L. F. Johnson, H. Witchey, R. Smith, A. Levine, and K. Haywood. The 2010 Horizon report: Museum edition. The New Media Consortium, 2010.
21. E. Kaasinen. User acceptance of mobile services value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption. VTT Publications, 566, 2005.
22. H. Karimi and A. Hammad, editors. Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services, chapter 9. Taylor and Francis Books Ltd., 2004.
23. J. Keil, M. Zöllner, M. Becker, F.Wientapper, T. Engelke, and H. Wuest. The house of Olbrich - an augmented reality tour through architectual history. In 10th International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB 2011), pages 243-252, 2011.
24. J. Krogstie. Bridging research and innovation by applying living labs for design science research. In Nordic Contributions in IS Research, pages 159-176. Springer, 2012.
25. J. A. Krosnick and M. K. Berent. Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey question format. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3):941-964, 1993.
26. F. Laroche, Serviêrest, D. Lefèvre, and J.-L. Kerouanton. Where virtual enhances physical mock-up: A way to understand our heritage. In Proceedings of ISMAR 2011, pages 1-6, 2011.
27. T.-P. Liang and Y.-H. Yeh. Effect of use contexts on the continuous use of mobile services: the case of mobile games. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(2):187-196, 2010.
28. Y. Liu and H. Li. Exploring the impact of use context on mobile hedonic services adoption: An empirical study on mobile gaming in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2):890-898, 2011.
29. S. Mora, A. Boron, and M. Divitini. CroMAR: Mobile augmented reality for supporting reflection on crowd management. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 4(2):88-101, 2012.
30. J. Nielsen. Iterative user-interface design. Computer, 26(11):32-41, 1993.
31. C. O'Muircheartaigh, G. Gaskell, and D. B. Wright. Weighing anchors: Verbal and numeric labels for response scales. Journal of Official Statistics, 11(3):295-307, 1995.
32. R. Peres, A. Correia, and M. Moital. The indicators of intention to adopt mobile electronic tourist guides. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2(2):120-138, 2011.
33. S. Petter, D. Straub, and A. Rai. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4):623-656, 2007.
34. C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker. SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). http://www.smartpls.de, 2005. Hamburg, Germany.
35. W. F. Rosenberg. Dealing with multiplicities in pharmacoepidemiological studies. Pharmacoepedimiology and Drug Safety, (5):95-100, 1996.
36. H. C. Triandis. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior, volume 27, pages 195-259. University of Nebraska Press, 1980.
37. C.-Y. Tsai. An analysis of usage intentions for mobile travel guide systems. Journal of Business Management, 4(13):2962-2970, 2011.
38. J. S. Uebersax. Likert scales: Dispelling the confusion. http: //www.john-uebersax.com/stat/likert.htm, 2006. Consulted March 26, 2012.
39. H. van der Heijden. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4):695-704, 2004.
40. H. van der Heijden, M. Ogertschnig, and L. van der Gaast. Effects of Context Relevance and Perceived Risk on User Acceptance of Mobile Information Services, pages 286-296. 2005.
41. N. van Kleef, J. Noltes, and S. van der Spoel. Success factors for augmented reality business models. In Study tour Pixel 2010, pages 1-36. University of Twente, 2010.
42. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2):186-204, 2000.
43. H. Verkasalo, C. López-Nicolás, F. J. Molina-Castillo, and H. Bouwman. Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3):242-255, 2010.
44. V. Vlahakis, N. Ioannidis, J. Karigiannis, M. Tsotros, and M. Gounaris. Virtual reality and information technology for archaeological site promotion. In 5th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS02), 2002.
45. J.-H. Wu and S.-C. Wang. What drives mobile commerce? an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information Management, 42:719-729, 2005.
46. M. Zöllner, J. Keil, H.Wüst, and D. Pletinckx. An augmented reality presentation system for remote cultural heritage site. In K. Debattista, C. Perlingieri, D. Pitzalis, and S. Spina, editors, The 10th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST 2009, 2009.