The topography of multiple drug use among adolescent Australians: Findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2068-2073

  White, Angela ^a   Chan, Gary C K ^a   Quek, Lake Hui ^a   Connor, Jason P ^a   Saunders, John B ^a   Baker, Peter ^a   Brackenridge, Charlotte ^a   Kelly, Adrian B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Latent class analysis; Multidrug use

Indexed keywords

3,4 METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE; AMPHETAMINE; ANALGESIC AGENT; CANNABIS; COCAINE; METHAMPHETAMINE; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT; TRANQUILIZER;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SCHOOL CHILD; SMOKING; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ALCOHOL DRINKING; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; PEER GROUP; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84873542011     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: 18736327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agrawal A., Lynskey M., Madden P., Bucholz K., Heath A. A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Addiction 2007, 102(1):94-104.
2. AIHW 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings. Drug statistics series no. 22 2008.
3. AIHW 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: First results 2008, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
4. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 1974, 19(6):716-723.
5. Andrews G., Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2001, 25(6):494-497.
6. Australian Bureau of Statistics Socio-economic indices for areas 2009, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings 2008, (Canberra).
8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2010 National Drug Strategy Household Survey Report. Drug statistics series no. 25. Cat. no. PHE 145 2011, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
9. Booth B.M., Curran G., Han X., Wright P., Frith S., Leukefeld C., et al. Longitudinal relationship between psychological distress and multiple substance use: Results from a three-year multisite natural-history study of rural stimulant users. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2010, 71(2):258-267.
10. Briere F.N., Fallu J.S., Descheneaux A., Janosz M. Predictors and consequences of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in adolescents. Addictive Behaviors 2011, 36(7):785-788.
11. Chikritzhs T., Allsop S. Review: Trends in alcohol related hospital use by young people by Access Economics 2009, Curtin University of Technology, Perth (Australia).
12. Chikritzhs T., Stockwell T., Heale P., Dietze P., Webb M. National alcohol indicators bulletin 2: Trends in alcohol-related road injury in Australia 1990-1997 2000, National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, http://www.ndri.curtin.edu.au/publications/naip.html.
13. Cleveland M., Collins L., Lanza S., Greenberg M., Feinberg M. Does Individual risk moderate the effect of contextual-level protective factors? A latent class analysis of substance use. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 2010, 38(3):213-228.
14. Connell C., Gilreath T., Aklin W., Brex R. Social-ecological influences on patterns of substance use among non-metropolitan high school students. American Journal of Community Psychology 2010, 45(1):36-48.
15. de Looze M.E., Pickett W., Raaijmakers Q., Kuntsche E., Hublet A., Gabhainn S.N., et al. Early risk behaviors and adolescent injury in 25 European and North American countries: A cross-national consistent relationship. The Journal of Early Adolescence 2011, 32(1):104-125.
16. Degenhardt L., Coffey C., Carlin J.B., Swift W., Moore E., Patton G.C. Outcomes of occasional cannabis use in adolescence: 10-year follow-up study in Victoria, Australia. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 196(4):290-295.
17. Department of Health and Human Services The health consequences of smoking: A report of the surgeon general 2004, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta.
18. Dierker L.C., Vesel F., Sledjeski E.M., Costello D., Perrine N. Testing the dual pathway hypothesis to substance use in adolescence and young adulthood. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007, 87(1):83-93.
19. Elder R.W., Shults R.A., Swahn M.H., Strife B.J., Ryan G.W. Alcohol-related emergency department visits among people ages 13 to 25 years. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2004, 65(3):297-300.
20. Ellickson P.L., Tucker J.S., Klein D.J. Ten-year prospective study of public health problems associated with early drinking. Pediatrics 2003, 111(5 Pt 1):949-955.
21. Evans-Whipp T., Beyers J.M., Lloyd S., Lafazia A.N., Toumbourou J.W., Arthur M.W., et al. A review of school drug policies and their impact on youth substance use. Health Promotion International 2004, 19(2):227-234.
22. Evans-Whipp T., Bond L., Ukoumunne O.C., Toumbourou J.W., Catalano R.F. The impact of school tobacco policies on student smoking in Washington State, United States and Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2010, 7:698-710.
23. Fergusson D.M., Boden J.M., Horwood L.J. The developmental antecedents of illicit drug use: Evidence from a 25-year longitudinal study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 96:165-177.
24. Hagenaars J.A., McCutcheon A.L. Applied latent class analysis 2002, Cambridge University Press.
25. Hall W., Solowij N. Adverse effects of cannabis. The Lancet 1998, 352(9140):1611-1616.
26. Hayatbakhsh M.R., Najman J.M., Jamrozik K., Mamun A.A., Alati R. Do parents' marital circumstances predict young adults' DSM-IV cannabis use disorders? A prospective study. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2006, 101(12):1778-1786.
27. Kelly A.B., O'Flaherty M., Connor J.P., Homel R., Toumbourou J.W., Patton G.C., et al. The influence of parents, siblings, and peers on pre- and early-teen smoking: A multi-level model. Drug and Alcohol Review 2011, 30:381-387.
28. Kelly A.B., O'Flaherty M., Toumbourou J.W., Connor J.P., Hemphill S., Catalano R.F. Gender differences in the impact of families on alcohol use: A lagged longitudinal study of pre-teens. Addiction 2011, 106:1427-1436.
29. Kelly A.B., Toumbourou J.W., O'Flaherty M., Patton G.C., Homel R., Connor J.P., et al. Family risks for early alcohol use: Evidence for gender-specific risk processes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2011, 72:399-407.
30. Korhonen T., Huizink A.C., Dick D.M., Pulkkinen L., Rose R.J., Kaprio J. Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: A longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 97(1-2):33-43.
31. Lo Y., Mendell N.R., Rubin D.B. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 2001, 88(3):767.
32. Lynskey M.T., Agrawal A., Bucholz K.K., Nelson E.C., Madden P.A., Todorov A.A., et al. Subtypes of illicit drug users: A latent class analysis of data from an Australian twin sample. Twin Research and Human Genetics 2006, 9(4):523-530.
33. Malmberg M., Overbeek G., Monshouwer K., Lammers J., Vollebergh W.A., Engels R.C. Substance use risk profiles and associations with early substance use in adolescence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2010, 33(6):474-485.
34. McLachlan G.J., Peel D. Finite mixture models (Vol. 299) 2000, Wiley-Interscience.
35. Muthen B.O., Muthen L.C. Mplus version 6.01 2011, Muthen and Muthen, Los Angeles.
36. Nylund K.L., Asparouhov T., Muthén B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling 2007, 14(4):535-569.
37. Palmer R.H.C., Young S.E., Hopfer C.J., Corley R.P., Stallings M.C., Crowley T.J., et al. Developmental epidemiology of drug use and abuse in adolescence and young adulthood: Evidence of generalized risk. [Peer reviewed]. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2009, 102(1-3):78-87.
38. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 1978, 6(2):461-464.
39. Smith G.W., Farrell M., Bunting B.P., Houston J.E., Shevlin M. Patterns of polydrug use in Great Britain: Findings from a national household population survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2011, 113(2-3):222-228.
40. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 2009, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
41. Swahn M.H., Simon T.R., Hammig B.J., Guerrero J.L. Alcohol-consumption behaviors and risk for physical fighting and injuries among adolescent drinkers. Addictive Behaviors 2004, 29(5):959-963.
42. Swift W., Coffey C., Carlin J.B., Degenhardt L., Calabria B., Patton G.C. Are adolescents who moderate their cannabis use at lower risk of later regular and dependent cannabis use?. Addiction 2009, 104(5):806-814.
43. Toumbourou J., Beyers J., Catalano R., Hawkins J., Arthur M., Evans-Whipp T., et al. Youth alcohol and other drug use in the United States and Australia: A cross-national comparison of three state-wide samples. Drug and Alcohol Review 2005, 24(6):515-523.
44. van Leeuwen A.P., Verhulst F.C., Reijneveld S.A., Vollebergh W.A.M., Ormel J., Huizink A.C. Can the gateway hypothesis, the common liability model and/or, the route of administration model predict initiation of cannabis use during adolescence? A survival analysis-The trails study. Journal of Adolescent Health 2011, 48(1):73-78.
45. Yang C.-C. Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2006, 50(4):1090-1104.