Autologistic regression and multicriteria evaluation models for the prediction of forest expansion

New Forests

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 163-181

  Triantakonstantis, Dimitrios P ^a   Kalivas, Dionissios P ^a   Kollias, Vassiliki J ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Autologistic regression; Forest expansion; Land use changes; Ordered weighted averaging; ROC

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; HEURISTIC METHODS; LAND USE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; AUTOLOGISTIC REGRESSION; FOREST EXPANSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT; WEIGHTED LINEAR COMBINATIONS;

FORECASTING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; BIODIVERSITY; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

FORECASTS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; MATERIALS HANDLING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSPORT;

GREECE;

EID: 84873524170     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-012-9308-x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adamakopoulos T, Gatzoyannis S, Poirazidis K (1995) Study on the assessment, the enhancement of the legal infrastructure and the management of the protected area in the forest of Dadia. Specific environmental study, conducted by the WWF Greece pursuant to the Ministerial Decret No. 6926/1990, Athens (in Greek).
2. Ananda J, Herath G (2003) The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. For Policy Econ 5: 13-26.
3. Augustin NH, Mugglestone MA, Buckland ST (1996) An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Appl Geogr 33: 339-347.
4. Bayala J, Kindt R, Belem M, Kalinganire A (2010) Factors affecting the dynamics of tree diversity in agroforestry parklands of cereal and cotton farming systems in Burkina Faso. New For 41: 281-296.
5. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2008) Implementation an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 34: 399-410.
6. Boyd DS, Foody GM, Ripple WJ (2002) Evaluation of approaches for forest cover estimation in the Pacific Northwest, USA, using remote sensing. Appl Geogr 22: 375-392.
7. Briassoulis H (2000) Analysis of land use change: Theoretical and modelling approaches. The Web Book of Regional Science, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown. Online at http://www. rri. wvu. edu/regscweb. htm.
8. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Burton PJ (1993) Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition. Can J For Res 23: 2141-2152.
10. Campbell KA, Dewhurst SM (2007) A hierarchical simulation-through-optimization approach to forest disturbance modelling. Ecol Model 202: 281-296.
11. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1): 37-46.
12. D'Amato AW, Puettmann KJ (2004) The relative dominance hypothesis explains interaction dynamics in mixed species Alnus rubra/Pseudotsuga menziesii stands. J Ecol 92: 450-463.
13. Domenrich TA, McFadden D (1975) Urban travel demand: behavioural analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. Eastman RJ (2003) Idrisi Kilimanjaro, Manual. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester.
15. ESRI (2008) ArcGIS 9. 3. Redlands.
16. Freeman EA, Moisen GG (2008) A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa. Ecol Model 217: 48-58.
17. Goldberg DE (1987) Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology 68: 1211-1223.
18. Gutierrez F, Navines R, Navarro P, Garcia-Esteve L, Subira S, Torrens M, Martin-Santos R (2008) What do all personality disorders have in common? Ineffectiveness and uncooperativeness. Compr Psychiatry 49: 570-578.
19. Hanspach J, Kuhn I, Pysek P, Boos E, Klotz S (2008) Correlates of naturalization and occupancy o introduced ornamentals in Germany. Perspect Plant Ecol 10: 241-250.
20. Ismail Z, Herrmann N, Rothenburg LS, Gotter A, Leibovitch FS, Rafi-Tari S, Blach SE, Lanctot KL (2008) A functional neuroimaging study of appetite loss in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci 271: 97-103.
21. Jelinski D, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11(3): 129-140.
22. Jiang H, Eastman JR (2000) Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14(2): 173-184.
23. Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London.
24. Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72: 445-463.
25. Lopez AS, Civil RS, Jimenez JG, Ayanz JSM (2008) Integration of socio-economic and environmental factors for modelling long-term fire danger in Southern Europe. Eur J For Res 127: 149-163.
26. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York.
27. Malczewski J (2006) Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land use suitability analysis. Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 8: 270-277.
28. Malczewski J, Chapman T, Flegel C, Walters D, Shrubsole D, Healy MA (2003) GIS-multicriteria evaluation with ordered weighted averaging (OWA): case study of developing management strategies. Environ Plan 35(10): 1769-1784.
29. Marrocco C, Molinara M, Tortorella F (2006) Exploiting AUC for optimal linear combinations of dichotomizers. Pattern Recognit Lett 27: 900-907.
30. Mertens B, Lambin EF (1997) Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Appl Geogr 17: 143-162.
31. Miller C, Urban DL (2000) Modeling the effects of fire management alternatives on Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecol Appl 10(1): 85-94.
32. Osborne PE, Alonso JC, Bryant RG (2001) Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards. Appl Ecol 38: 458-471.
33. Overmars KP, de Koning GHJ, Veldkamp A (2003) Spatial in multi-scale land use models. Ecol Model 164: 257-270.
34. Poirazidis K (2002) Systematic monitoring plan of Dadia-Leykimi-Soufli nature reserve. Record of landscape characteristic of Dadia forest in 2001, WWF-Greece, Athens, 38 pp (unpublished study-in Greek).
35. Reyer C, Guericke M, Ibisch PL (2009) Climate change mitigation via afforestation, reforestation and deforestation avoidance: and what about adaptation to environmental change? New For 38: 15-34.
36. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Math Psychol 15: 234-281.
37. Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9: 161-176.
38. Saaty TL (1994a) Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 74: 426-447.
39. Saaty TL (1994b) The fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. AHP series, vol VI. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, p 527.
40. Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza GA, Pesonen M (2001) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer, Amsterdam.
41. Serneels S, Lambin EF (2001) Proximate causes of land use change in Narok District Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85: 65-81.
42. Simard SW, Zimonick BJ (2005) Neighborhood size effects on mortality, growth and crown morphology of paper birch. For Ecol Manag 214: 251-265.
43. Tortorella F (2005) A ROC-based reject rule for dichotomizers. Pattern Recognit Lett 26: 167-180.
44. Triantakonstantis DP, Kollias VJ, Kalivas DP (2006) Forest re-growth since 1945 in the Dadia forest nature reserve in northern Greece. New For 32: 51-69.
45. Tsai Y (2005) Quantifying urban form: compactness versus 'sprawl'. Urban Stud 42(1): 141-161.
46. Tzeng HM, Yin CY (2008) Crisis management systems: staff nurses demand more support form their supervisors. Appl Nurs Res 21: 131-138.
47. Valente ROA, Vettorazzi CA (2008) Definition of priority areas for forest conservation through the ordered weighted averaging method. For Ecol Manag 256: 1408-1417.
48. Vardakis G, Ziangas E, Nakos G (1996) Land resource map of Greece. Map sheets of Mega Dereion and Soufli, scale 1: 50. 000. Forest Research Institute of Athens.
49. Veldkamp A, Verburg PH (2004) Modelling land use change and environmental impact: introduction to the spatial issue. Environ Manag 72: 1-3.
50. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A (2005) Editorial: spatial modeling to explore land use dynamics. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19: 99-102.
51. White R, Engelen G (2000) High resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 23: 383-400.
52. Wu F (2002) Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 16(8): 795-818.
53. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1): 183-190.
54. Yager RR (1996) Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Intell Syst 11: 49-73.