Teleaudiology: Evaluation of teleconsultation efficacy for hearing aid fitting

Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 301-308

  Campos, Patrícia Danieli ^a   Ferrari, Deborah Viviane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Audiology; Hearing aids; Hearing disorders; Hearing loss; Remote consultation; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BRAZIL; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELECONSULTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY; BRAZIL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84873510150     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21796491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S2179-64912012000400003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Givens DG, Elangovan S. Internet application to tele-audiology - "nothing' but net". Am J Audiol. 2003;12(2): 59-65.
2. Lancaster P, Krumm M, Ribera J, Klich R. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school. Am J Audiol. 2008;17(2): 114-22.
3. Conselho Federal de Fonoaudiologia. Resolução no 366 de 25 de abril de 2009. Dispõe sobre a regulamentação do uso do sistema Telessaúde em Fonoaudiologia. Conselho Federal de Fonoaudilogia, Brasília DF, 25 de abril de 2009.
4. Swanepoel de W, Olusanya BO, Mars M. Hearing healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa - a role for tele-audiology. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;16(2): 53-6.
5. Ferrari DV. Remote programming and verification as a mean to improve quality of hearing aid fitting. In: Rasmussen AN, Paulsen T, Andersen T, Larsen CB (org.) Hearing aid fitting. 1a ed. Centertryk: Danavox Jubilee Foundation; 2006. p. 531-44.
6. Ferrari DV, Bernardez-Braga GR. Remote probe microphone measurement to verify hearing aid performance. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(3): 122-4.
7. Graciano MI, Lehfeld NA, Neves-Filho A. Instrumental de classificação sócio-econômica. Serv Social Realid. 1999;5(1): 109-28.
8. Byrne D, Dillon H, Ching T, Katsch R, Keidser Gl. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;12(1): 37-51.
9. Dillon H. Hearing aids. New York: Thieme; 2001.
10. Hawkins DB, Cook JA. Hearing aid software predictive gain values: how accurate are they? The Hearing Journal. 2003;56(7): 26-34.
11. Bevilacqua MC, Banhara MR, Da Costa EA, Vignoly AB, Alvarenga KF. The Brazilian Portuguese hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(6): 364-5.
12. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(1): 30-5.
13. Cox RM. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(1): 90-6.
14. Swanepoel de W, Koekemoer D, Clark J. Intercontinental hearing assessment - a study in tele-audiology. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(5): 248-52.
15. Ramos A, Rodriguez C, Martinez-Beneyto P, Perez D, Gault A, et al. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(5): 533-40.
16. Zumpano CE, Bevilacqua MC, Frederigue-Lopes NB, Costa OA. Programação remota dos sistemas de implante coclear. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2009;14(3): 539-46.
17. Towers AD, Pisa J, Froelich TM, Krumm M. The reliability of clickevoked and frequency-specific auditory brainstem response testing using telehealth technology. Semin Hear. 2005;26(1): 26-34.
18. Harrison R, MacFarlane A, Murray E, Wallace P. Patients' perceptions of joint teleconsultations: a qualitative evaluation. Health Expect. 2006;9(1): 81-90.
19. Giolas TG. Reabilitação aural de adultos com deficiência auditiva. In: Katz J. Tratado de audiologia clínica. 4a ed. São Paulo: Manole; 1999. p. 766-82.
20. Barlow NL, Auslander MC, Rines D, Stelmachowicz PG. Probe-tube microphones measures in hearing-impaired children and adults. Ear Hear. 1988;9(5): 243-7.
21. Magni C, Freiberger F, Tonn K. Avaliação do grau de satisfação entre os usuários de amplificação de tecnologia analógica e digital. Braz J Otorrinolaryngol. 2005;71(5): 650-7.
22. Dillon H, Birtles G, Lovegrove R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and the hearing aid user's questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10: 67-79.
23. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14(8): 403-13.
24. Gasparin M, Menegotto IH, Cunha CS. Psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(1): 85-90.
25. Heuermann H, Kinkel M, Tchorz J. Comparison of psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOIHA) in various studies. Int J Audiol.2005;44(2): 102-9.
26. Swanepoel de W, Hall JW. A systematic review of telehealth applications in audiology. Telemed J E Heath. 2010;16(2): 1-20