Perfume Odor Categorization: To What Extent Trained Assessors and Consumers Agree?

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 76-89

  Veramendi, Mily ^a   Herencia, Pilar ^a   Ares, Gastón ^b  

^a Laboratorio de Evaluación Sensorial Belcorp   (Peru)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; CONSUMER SHOPPING; ODOR CHARACTER; ODOR CHARACTERIZATION; ODOR PROFILES; SENSORY MAPS;

ODORS;

EID: 84873502114     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12025     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. API, A.M. and HAKKINEN, P.J. 2005. Fragrances and perfumes. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 2nd Ed. (P. Wexler, ed.) pp. 382-384, Academic Press, New York, NY.
2. ARES, G., VARELA, P., RADO, G. and GIMÉNEZ, A. 2011a. Are consumer profiling techniques equivalent for some product categories? The case of orange-flavoured powdered drinks. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 1600-1608.
3. ARES, G., VARELA, P., RADO, G. and GIMÉNEZ, A. 2011b. Comparison of four statistical approaches to analyze data from a sorting task. 9th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 4-8 September 2011. Toronto, Canada.
4. BÉCUE-BERTAU, M. and PAGÈS, J. 2004. A principal axes method for comparing contingency tables: MFACT. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 45, 481-503.
5. BÉGUIN, P. 1993. La classification et la denomination de parfums chez des experts et des novices. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique.
6. CADORET, M., LÊ, S. and PAGÈS, J. 2009. A factorial approach for sorting task data (FAST). Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 410-417.
7. CARTIER, R., RYTZ, A., LECOMTE, A., POBLETE, F., KRYSTLIK, J., BELIN, E. and MARTIN, N. 2006. Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 562-571.
8. CHASTRETTE, M., ELMOUAFFEK, E. and SAUVEGRAIN, P. 1988. A multidimensional statistical study of similarities among 74 notes used in perfumery. Chem. Senses 13, 295-305.
9. CHOLLET, S., LELIÈVRE, M., ABDI, H. and VALENTIN, D. 2011. Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 507-520.
10. CHOLLET, S. and VALENTIN, D. 2001. Impact of training on beer flavor perception and description: Are trained and untrained subjects really different? J. Sensory Studies 16, 601-618.
11. CHOLLET, S., VALENTIN, D. and ABDI, H. 2005. Do trained assessors generalize their knowledge to new stimuli? Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 13-23.
12. DORRI, Y., SABEGHI, M. and KURIEN, B.T. 2007. Awaken olfactory receptors of humans and experimental animals by coffee odorants to induce appetite. Med. Hypotheses 69, 508-509.
13. EDWARDS, M. 2004. Fragrances of the World, Crescent House Publishers, Carlsbad, CA.
14. GROSOFSKY, A., HAUPERT, M.L. and VERSTEEG, S.W. 2011. An exploratory investigation of coffee and lemon scents and odor identification. Percept. Mot. Skills 112, 536-538.
15. ISO. 1988. ISO 8589. Sensory Analysis: General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. JELLINEK, J.S. 1990. A consumer oriented classification of perfumes. Dragoco Rep. 27, 19-24.
17. JELLINEK, J.S. 1992. Perfume classification: A new approach. In Fragance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume (S. Van Toller and G.H. Dodd, eds.) pp. 229-242, Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.
18. JELLINEK, J.S. 1997. The psychological basis of perfumery: A re-evaluation. In The Psychological Basis of Perfumery, 4th Ed. (J.S. Jellinek, ed.) pp. 240-257, Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
19. JELLINEK, P. 1997. Personal perfume selection. In The Psychological Basis of Perfumery, 4th Ed. (J.S. Jellinek, ed.) pp. 53-162, Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
20. KINNEAR, T.C. and TAYLOR, J.R. 1993. Investigación de Mercados. Un enfoque aplicado, pp. 361-371, McGraw-Hill Interamericana S.A., Bogotá, Colombia.
21. KOSTOV, B., BÉCUE-BERTAUT, M., HUSSON, F., PAGÈS, J., CADORET, M., TORRENS, J. and URPI, P. 2012. A tool for detecting words with consensual meaning in labeled categorized napping. 11th Sensometrics, 10-13 July 2012. Rennes, France.
22. LABBE, D., RYTZ, A. and HUGI, A. 2004. Training is a critical step to obtain reliable product profiles in a real food industry context. Food Qual. Prefer. 15, 341-348.
23. LAING, D.G., LIVERMORE, B.A. and FRANCIS, G.W. 1991. The human sense of smell has a limited capacity for identifying odors in mixtures. Chem. Senses 16, 392.
24. LAWLESS, H.T. and GLATTER, S. 1990. Consistency of multidimensional scaling models derived from odor sorting. J. Sensory Studies 5, 217-230.
25. LAWLESS, H.T. and HEYMANN, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices, 2nd Ed., pp. 34-40, Springer, New York, NY.
26. LAWLESS, H.T., SHENG, N. and KNOOPS, S.S.C.P. 1995. Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 6, 91-98.
27. LÊ, S. and HUSSON, F. 2008. SensoMineR: A package for sensory data analysis. J. Sensory Studies 23, 14-25.
28. LÊ, S., JOSSE, J. and HUSSON, F. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1-18.
29. LELIÈVRE, M., CHOLLET, S., ABDI, H. and VALENTIN, D. 2008.What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 697-703.
30. LIM, J. and LAWLESS, H.T. 2005. Qualitative differences of divalent salts: Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chem. Senses 30, 719-726.
31. MENSING, J. and BECK, C. 1988. The psychology of fragrance selection. In Perfumery: The Psychology and Biology of Fragrance (S.V. Toller and G.H. Dodd, eds.) pp. 185-204, Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
32. PAGÈS, J. 2004. Multiple Factor Analysis: Main features and application to sensory data. Rev. Colomb. Estad. 27, 1-26.
33. PALMERI, T.J.,WONG, A. and GAUTHIER, I. 2004. Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 378-386.
34. POPPER, P. and HEYMANN, H. 1996. Analyzing differences among products and panelists by multidimensional scaling. In Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science (T. Naes and E. Risvik, eds.) pp. 159-184, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
35. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2007. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
36. ROBERT, P. and ESCOUFIER, Y. 1976. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient. Appl. Stat. 25, 257-265.
37. SAINT-EVE, A., PAÀI KORA, E. and MARTIN, N. 2004. Impact of the olfactory quality and chemical complexity of the flavouring agent on the texture of low fat stirred yogurts assessed by three different sensory methodologies. Food Qual.Prefer. 15, 655-668.
38. SALVADOR-CARREÑO, A. and CHISVERT, A. 2005. Perfumes. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 2nd Ed. (P. Worsfold, A. Townshend and C. Poole, eds.) pp. 36-42, Academic Press, New York, NY.
39. SECUNDO, L. and SOBEL, N. 2006. The influence of smelling coffee on olfactory habituation. Chem. Senses 31, A52.
40. SOUFFLET, I., CALONNIER, M. and DACREMONT, C. 2004.
41. A comparison between industrial experts' and novices' haptic perceptual organization: A tool to identify descriptors of the handle of fabrics. Food Qual. Prefer. 15, 689-699.
42. VALENTIN, D., CHOLLET, S., BÉAL, S. and PATRIS, B. 2007. Expertise and memory for beers and beer olfactory compounds. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 776-785.
43. VARELA, P. and ARES, G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Res. Int. 48, 893-908.
44. ZARZO, M. 2008. Psychologic dimensions in the perception of everyday odors: Pleasantness and edibility. J. Sensory Studies 23, 354-376.
45. ZARZO, M. and STANTON, D.T. 2009. Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers' odor perception spaces as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 225-247.