TATES: Efficient Multivariate Genotype-Phenotype Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Studies

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  van der Sluis, Sophie ^a   Posthuma, Danielle ^a,b   Dolan, Conor V ^c,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STANDARD; TRAIT BASED ASSOCIATION TEST THAT USES EXTENDED SIMES ANALYSIS; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84873489284     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003235     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Corvin A, Craddock N, Sullivan PF, (2010) Genome-wide association studies: a primer. Psychol Med 40: 1063-1077.
2. McClellan J, King MC, (2010) Genetic heterogeneity in human disease. Cell 141: 210-217.
3. Dowell RD, Ryan O, Jansen A, Cheung D, Agarwala S, et al. (2010) Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328: 469-469.
4. Medland S, Neale MC, (2010) An integrated phenomic approach to multivariate allelic association. Eur J Hum Genet 18: 233-239.
5. Minica CC, Boomsma DI, van der Sluis S, Dolan CV, (2010) Genetic Association in Multivariate Phenotypic Data: Power in Five Models. Twin Res Hum Genet 13: 525-543.
6. Van der Sluis S, Verhage M, Posthuma D, Dolan CV, (2010) Phenotypic Complexity, Measurement Bias, and Poor Phenotypic Resolution Contribute to the Missing Heritability Problem in Genetic Association Studies. Plos One 5: e13929.
7. Van der Sluis S, Posthuma D, Nivard MG, Verhage M, Dolan CV, (2012) Power in GWAS: lifting the curse of the clinical cut-off. Mol Psych doi:10.1038/mp.2012.65.
8. Van der Maas HLJ, Dolan CV, Grasman RPPP, Wicherts JM, Huizenga HM, et al. (2006) A Dynamic model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychol Rev 113: 842-861.
9. Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, van der Maas HLJ, Borsboom D, (2010) Comorbidity: a network perspective. Behav Brain Sci 33: 137-193.
10. Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ, Schmittmann VD, Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, (2011) The small world of psychopathology. Plos One 6: e27407.
11. O'Reilly PF, Hoggart CJ, Pomyen Y, Calboli FCF, Elliott P, et al. (2012) MultiPhen: Joint model of multiple phenotypes can increase discovery in GWAS. Plos One 7: e34861.
12. Ferreira MAR, Purcell SM, (2009) A multivariate test of association. Bioinformatics 25: 132-133.
13. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559-575.
14. Cole DA, Maxwell SE, Avrey RD, Salas E, (1994) How the power of MANOVA can both increase and decrease as a function of the intercorrelations among the dependent variables. Psychol Bull 115: 465-474.
15. Li M-X, Gui H-S, Kwan JSH, Sham PC, (2011) GATES: a rapid and powerful gene-based association test using extended Simes procedure. Am J Hum Genet 88: 283-293.
16. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM, (2007) GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294-1296.
17. Aulchenko YS, Struchalin MV, van Duijn CM, (2010) ProbABEL package for genome-wide association analysis of imputed data. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 134.
18. Li Y, Willer CJ, Ding J, Scheet P, Abecasis GR, (2010) MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet Epidemiol 34: 816-834.
19. Li Y, Willer CJ, Sanna S, Abecasis GR, (2009) Genotype Imputation. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 387-406.
20. Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P, (2007) A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies via imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet 39: 906-913.
21. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR, (2002) Merlin-rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30: 97-101.
22. Lange C, DeMeo D, Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Laird NM, (2004) PBAT: Tools for family-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 74: 367-369.
23. Lawley DN, Maxwell AE (1971) Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworth.
24. Carroll JB (1993) Human Cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University press.
25. Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
26. Digman JM, (1997) Higher-order factors of the big five. J Pers Soc Psychol 73: 1246-1256.
27. Henderson ND, Turri MG, DeFries JC, Flint J, (2004) QTL analysis of multiple behavioural measures of anxiety in mice. Behav Genet 34: 267-293.
28. Brzustowics LM, Bassett AS, (2008) Phenotype matters: The case for careful characterization of relevant traits. Am J Psychiat 165: 1096-1098.
29. Bloss CS, Schiabor KM, Schork NJ, (2010) Human behavioral informatics in genetic studies of neuropsychiatric disease: multi-variate profile-based analysis. Brain Res Bull 83: 177-188.
30. Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S, (2010) Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet 11: 855-866.
31. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
32. Rasch G (1980) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996-2001) LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide, SSI Scientific Software International. Suite. USA.
34. Whitlock MC, (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. J Evolution Biol 18: 1368-1373.
35. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2006) Mx: statistical modeling, 7th edn. Department of Psychiatry, VCU, Richmond.
36. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2012) Mplus User's Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.