Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 90, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 4716-4722

  Boligon, A A ^a   Long, N ^b   Albuquerque, L G ^a   Weigel, K A ^b   Gianola, D ^b   osa, G J M ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; Genomic selection; Molecular markers; Predictive ability; Selective genotyping

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84873457396     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-4857     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ansari-Mahyari, S., A. C. Sørensen, M. S. Lund, H. Thomsen, and P. Berg. 2008. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1628-1639.
2. Calus, M. P. L., T. Meuwissen, A. P. W. De Roos, and R. F. Veerkamp. 2008. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 178:553-561.
3. Ehsani, A., L. Janss, and O. F. Christensen. 2010. Effects of Selective Genotyping on Genomic Prediction. Proc. 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany.
4. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389-2397.
5. Jiménez-Montero, J. A., O. Gonzalez-Recio, and R. Alenda. 2012. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy population. Animal 6:1216-1224.
6. Kizilkaya, K., R. L. Fernando, and D. J. Garrick. 2010. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. J. Anim. Sci. 88:544-551.
7. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
8. Park, T., and G. Casella. 2008. The Bayesian Lasso. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103:681-68
9. Patry, C, and V. Ducrocq. 2011. Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:30 doi:10.1186/1297-9686-43-30
10. Solberg, T. R., A. K. Sonesson, J. A. Woolliams, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2008. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J. Anim. Sci. 86:2447-2454.
11. Tenesa, A., P. Navarro, B. J. Hayes, D. L. Duffy, G. M. Clarke, M. E. Goddard, and P. M. Visscher. 2007. Recent human effective population size estimated from linkage disequilibrium. Genome Res. 17:520-526.
12. Toosi, A., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2010. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J. Anim. Sci. 88:32-46.
13. VanRaden, P. M., C. P. Van Tassell, G. R. Wiggans, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and F. S. Schenkel. 2009. Reliability of genomic predictions for North American dairy bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.
14. Vazquez, A. I., G. J. M. Rosa, K. A. Weigel, G. De los Campos, D. Gianola, and D. B. Allison. 2010. Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 93:5942-5949.
15. Weigel, K. A., G. De los Campos, O. González-Recio, H. Naya, X. L. Wu, N. Long, G. J. M. Rosa, and D. Gianola. 2009. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J. Dairy Sci. 92:5248-5257.