Correlation of biexponential diffusion parameters with arterial spin-labeling perfusion MRI: Results in transplanted kidneys

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 140-144

  Heusch, Philipp ^a   Wittsack, Hans Jörg ^a   Heusner, Till ^a   Buchbender, Christian ^a   Quang, Michael Nguyen ^a   Martirosian, Petros ^b   Bilk, Philip ^a   Kröpil, Patric ^a   Blondin, Dirk ^a   Antoch, Gerald ^a   Lanzman, Rotem S ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

ASL; DWI; transplanted kidney

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SPIN LABELING;

EID: 84873404968     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318277bfe3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Thoeny HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2006;241:812-821.
2. Blondin D, Lanzman RS, Klasen J, et al. Diffusion-attenuated MRI signal of renal allografts: comparison of two different statistical models. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W701-W705.
3. Notohamiprodjo M, Reiser MF, Sourbron SP. Diffusion and perfusion of the kidney. Eur JRadiol. 2010;76:337-347.
4. Haneder S, Augustin J, Jost G, et al. Impact of iso-and low-osmolar iodinated contrast agents on BOLD and diffusion MRI in swine kidneys. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:299-305.
5. Hueper K, Hartung D, Gutberlet M, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for evaluation of histopathological changes in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:430-437.
6. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging ofintravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radi-ology. 1986;161:401-407.
7. Chandarana H, Lee VS, Hecht E, et al. Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation ofrenal lesions: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:285-291.
8. Wittsack HJ, Lanzman RS, Mathys C, et al. Statistical evaluation ofdiffusion-weighted imaging of the human kidney. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:616-622.
9. Blondin D, Lanzman RS, Mathys C, et al. Functional MRI of transplanted kidneys using diffusion-weighted imaging [in German]. Rofo. 2009;181: 1162-1167.
10. Le Bihan D. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology. 2008;249:748-752.
11. Wirestam R, Borg M, Brockstedt S, et al. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:123-128.
12. Neil JJ, Bosch CS, Ackerman JJ. An evaluation of the sensitivity of the in-travoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) method of blood flow measurement to changes in cerebral blood flow. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:60-65.
13. Le Bihan D, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and clas-sical perfusion. Magn Reson Med. 1992;27:171-178.
14. Henkelman RM. Does IVIM measure classical perfusion? Magn Reson Med. 1990;16:470-475.
15. Lemke A, Laun FB, Simon D, et al. An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:1580-1585.
16. Schwenzer NF, Schraml C, Martirosian P, et al. MR measurement ofblood flow in the parotid gland without contrast medium: a functional study before and after gustatory stimulation. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:598-605.
17. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;15:10-27.
18. Boss A, Martirosian P, Claussen CD, et al. Quantitative ASL muscle perfusion imaging using a FAIR-True FISP technique at 3.0 T. NMR Biomed. 2006;19: 125-132.
19. Karger N, Biederer J, Lüsse S, et al. Quantitation ofrenal perfusion using ar-terial spin labeling with FAIR-UFLARE. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18: 641-647.
20. Warmuth C, Nagel S, Hegemann O, et al. Accuracy ofblood flow values de-termined by arterial spin labeling: a validation study in isolated porcine kidneys. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:353-358.
21. Martirosian P, Klose U, Mader I, et al. FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:353-361.
22. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum cre-atinine.Nephron. 1976;16:31-41.
23. Roberts DA, Detre JA, Bolinger L, et al. Renal perfusion in humans: MR imaging with spin tagging ofarterial water. Radiology. 1995;196:281-286.
24. Lanzman RS, Wittsack HJ, Martirosian P, et al. Quantification ofrenal allograft perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2010;20: 1485-1491.
25. Artz NS, Sadowski EA, Wentland AL, et al. Reproducibility ofrenal perfusion MR imaging in native and transplanted kidneys using non-contrast arterial spin labeling. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:1414-1421.
26. Wittsack HJ, Lanzman RS, Quentin M, et al. Temporally resolved electrocardiogram-triggered diffusion-weighted imaging of the human kidney: correlation between intravoxel incoherent motion parameters and renal blood flow at different time points of the cardiac cycle. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:226-230.
27. Sigmund EE, Vivier PH, Sui D, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology. 2012;263:758-769.
28. Wu WC, Su MY, Chang CC, et al. Renal perfusion 3-T MR imaging: a com-parative study of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced tech-niques. Radiology. 2011;261:845-853.
29. Fenchel M, Martirosian P, Langanke J, et al. Perfusion MR imaging with FAIR true FISP spin labeling in patients with and without renal artery stenosis: initial experience. Radiology. 2006;238:1013-1021.
30. Winter JD, St Lawrence KS, Cheng HL. Quantification of renal perfusion: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:608-615.
31. Eisenberger U, Thoeny HC, Binser T, et al. Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1374-1383.
32. Ritt M, Janka R, Schneider MP, et al. Measurement of kidney perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of MRI with arterial spin labeling to para-aminohippuric acid plasma clearance in male subjects with metabolic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1126-1133.
33. Rossi C, Artunc F, Martirosian P, et al. Histogram analysis ofrenal arterial spin labeling perfusion data reveals differences between volunteers and patients with mild chronic kidney disease. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:490M496.
34. Lanzman RS, Voiculescu A, Walther C, et al. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment oftransplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA. Radiology. 2009;252:914-921.
35. Döpfert J, Lemke A, Weidner A, et al. Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 29:1053-1058.