Age-related normal structural and functional ventricular values in cardiac function assessed by magnetic resonance

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Fiechter, Michael ^a,b   Fuchs, Tobias A ^a   Gebhard, Catherine ^a   Stehli, Julia ^a   Klaeser, Bernd ^a   Stähli, Barbara E ^a   Manka, Robert ^a   Manes, Costantina ^a   Tanner, Felix C ^a,b   Gaemperli, Oliver ^a   Kaufmann, Philipp A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Age; CMR; LV EF; Normal values; RV EF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VENTRICLE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873348239     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987, 76(1):44-51. 10.1161/01.CIR.76.1.44, 3594774.
2. Wong M, Johnson G, Shabetai R, Hughes V, Bhat G, Lopez B, Cohn JN. Echocardiographic variables as prognostic indicators and therapeutic monitors in chronic congestive heart failure. Veterans Affairs cooperative studies V-HeFT I and II. V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation 1993, 87(6 Suppl):VI65-VI70.
3. Matter C, Mandinov L, Kaufmann P, Nagel E, Boesiger P, Hess OM. Function of the residual myocardium after infarct and prognostic significance. Z Kardiol 1997, 86(9):684-690.
4. Wandt B, Bojo L, Hatle L, Wranne B. Left ventricular contraction pattern changes with age in normal adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998, 11(9):857-863. 10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70005-7, 9758377.
5. Harrison TR, Dixon K, Russell RO, Bidwai PS, Coleman HN. The Relation of Age to the Duration of Contraction, Ejection, and Relaxation of the Normal Human Heart. Am Heart J 1964, 67:189-199. 10.1016/0002-8703(64)90370-9, 14118487.
6. Kaku K, Takeuchi M, Otani K, Sugeng L, Nakai H, Haruki N, Yoshitani H, Watanabe N, Yoshida K, Otsuji Y. Age- and gender-dependency of left ventricular geometry assessed with real-time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011, 24(5):541-547. 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.011, 21345649.
7. Ruan Q, Nagueh SF. Effect of age on left ventricular systolic function in humans: a study of systolic isovolumic acceleration rate. Exp Physiol 2005, 90(4):527-534. 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.030007, 15769881.
8. Pfisterer ME, Battler A, Zaret BL. Range of normal values for left and right ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography. Eur Heart J 1985, 6(8):647-655.
9. Port S, Cobb FR, Coleman RE, Jones RH. Effect of age on the response of the left ventricular ejection fraction to exercise. N Engl J Med 1980, 303(20):1133-1137. 10.1056/NEJM198011133032001, 7421930.
10. Salmasi AM, Alimo A, Jepson E, Dancy M. Age-associated changes in left ventricular diastolic function are related to increasing left ventricular mass. Am J Hypertens 2003, 16(6):473-477. 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00846-X, 12799096.
11. Gebhard C, Stähli BE, Gebhard CE RJ, Tanner FC. Effect of age on left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by echocardiography. Cardiovasc Med 2012, 15(Suppl 21).
12. Nikitin NP, Loh PH, de Silva R, Witte KK, Lukaschuk EI, Parker A, Farnsworth TA, Alamgir FM, Clark AL, Cleland JG. Left ventricular morphology, global and longitudinal function in normal older individuals: a cardiac magnetic resonance study. Int J Cardiol 2006, 108(1):76-83. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.04.009, 16516701.
13. Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular MR Manual 2011, London: Springer, 1.
14. Gerstenblith G, Frederiksen J, Yin FC, Fortuin NJ, Lakatta EG, Weisfeldt ML. Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population. Circulation 1977, 56(2):273-278. 10.1161/01.CIR.56.2.273, 872321.
15. Hollingsworth KG, Blamire AM, Keavney BD, Macgowan GA. Left ventricular torsion, energetics, and diastolic function in normal human aging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012, 302(4):H885-892. 10.1152/ajpheart.00985.2011, 3322734, 22180656.
16. van Dalen BM, Soliman OI, Vletter WB, ten Cate FJ, Geleijnse ML. Age-related changes in the biomechanics of left ventricular twist measured by speckle tracking echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008, 295(4):H1705-1711. 10.1152/ajpheart.00513.2008, 18723767.
17. Yu CM, Lin H, Yang H, Kong SL, Zhang Q, Lee SW. Progression of systolic abnormalities in patients with "isolated" diastolic heart failure and diastolic dysfunction. Circulation 2002, 105(10):1195-1201. 10.1161/hc1002.105185, 11889013.
18. Anversa P, Palackal T, Sonnenblick EH, Olivetti G, Meggs LG, Capasso JM. Myocyte cell loss and myocyte cellular hyperplasia in the hypertrophied aging rat heart. Circ Res 1990, 67(4):871-885. 10.1161/01.RES.67.4.871, 2145091.
19. Shub C, Klein AL, Zachariah PK, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Determination of left ventricular mass by echocardiography in a normal population: effect of age and sex in addition to body size. Mayo Clin Proc 1994, 69(3):205-211. 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61058-1, 8133657.
20. Dannenberg AL, Levy D, Garrison RJ. Impact of age on echocardiographic left ventricular mass in a healthy population (the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol 1989, 64(16):1066-1068. 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90816-3, 2530879.
21. Cheng S, Fernandes VR, Bluemke DA, McClelland RL, Kronmal RA, Lima JA. Age-related left ventricular remodeling and associated risk for cardiovascular outcomes: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2(3):191-198. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.819938, 2744970, 19808592.
22. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, Valenta I, Strobel K, Brunner A, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Alkadhi H. Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med 2006, 47(8):1288-1294.
23. Germans T, Gotte MJ, Nijveldt R, Spreeuwenberg MD, Beek AM, Bronzwaer JG, Visser CA, Paulus WJ, van Rossum AC. Effects of aging on left atrioventricular coupling and left ventricular filling assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100(1):122-127. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.060, 17599453.
24. Sandstede J, Lipke C, Beer M, Hofmann S, Pabst T, Kenn W, Neubauer S, Hahn D. Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2000, 10(3):438-442. 10.1007/s003300050072, 10756992.
25. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006, 8(3):417-426. 10.1080/10976640600572889, 16755827.
26. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 2006, 27(23):2879-2888. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl336, 17088316.