Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and validation in a multicenter dataset

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 554-564

  Güiza, Fabian ^a   Depreitere, Bart ^a   Piper, Ian ^b   Van Den Berghe, Greet ^a   Meyfroidt, Geert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automated; data mining; decision support techniques; forecasting; Glasgow Outcome Scale; intensive care; intracranial hypertension; models; pattern recognition; statistical; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY; EUROPE; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN INJURIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873348118     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, et al: A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148:255-268; discussion 268
2. Lu J, Marmarou A, Choi S, et al;llabImpact and Abic Study Group: Mortality from traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 95:281-285
3. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24:37-44
4. Jones PA, Andrews PJD, Midgley S, et al: Measuring the burden of secondary insults in head injured patients during intensive care. J Neuro-surg Anaesth 1994; 6:4-14
5. Belli A, Sen J, Petzold A, et al: Metabolic failure precedes intracranial pressure rises in traumatic brain injury: A microdialysis study. Acta Neu-rochir (Wien) 2008; 150:461-469; discussion 470
6. Budohoski KP, Zweifel C, Kasprowicz M, et al: What comes frst? The dynamics of cerebral oxygenation and blood fow in response to changes in arterial pressure and intracranial pressure after head injury. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:89-99
7. Box G, Jenkins G: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Chapter 5; Revised Edition. Oakland, CA, Holden-Day, 1976, pp. 141-144
8. Signorini D F, Andrews PJ, Jones PA, et al: Adding insult to injury: The prognostic value of early secondary insults for survival after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1999; 66:26-31
9. Vik A, Nag T, Fredriksli OA, et al: Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2008; 109:678-684
10. Kahraman S, Dutton RP, Hu P, et al: Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2010; 69:110-118
11. Kirkness CJ, Burr RL, Mitchell PH: Intracranial pressure variability and long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Sup-pl 2008; 102:105-108
12. Treggiari MM, Schutz N, Yanez ND, et al: Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2007; 6:104-112
13. Kahraman S, Hu P, Stein DM, et al: Dynamic three-dimensional scoring of cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure provides a brain trauma index that predicts outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2011; 70:547-553
14. Lingsma H F, Roozenbeek B, Steyerberg EW, et al: Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: From prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9:543-554
15. Murray GD, Butcher I, McHugh GS, et al: Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: Results from the IMPACT study. J Neu-rotrauma 2007; 24:329-337
16. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators: Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Practical prognostic models based on large a cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008; 336: 425-429
17. Piper I, Citerio G, Chambers I, et al; BrainIT Group: The BrainIT group: Concept and core dataset defnition. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145:615-628; discussion 628
18. Meyfroidt G, Güiza F, Ramon J, et al: Machine learning techniques to examine large patient databases. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23:127-143
19. Witten I, Frank E: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Second Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, 2005
20. Hall MA: Correlation-Based Feature Subset Selection for Machine Learning. Hamilton, New Zealand, 1998
21. Meyfroidt G, Güiza F, Cottem D, et al: Computerized prediction of intensive care unit discharge after cardiac surgery: Development and validation of a Gaussian processes model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011; 11:64
22. Rasmussen CE, Williams C: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 2006
23. Efron B, Tibshirani R: Improvements on cross-validation: The 632+ bootstrap method. JASA 1997; 92: 548-560
24. Berkman S, Heang-Ping C, Lubomir H: Classifer performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset. Med Phys 2008; 35:1559-1570
25. Rasmussen CE, Williams C: Documentation for GPML Matlab Code. Available at: http://www.GaussianProcess.org/gpml/code/. Accessed August 1, 2012
26. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, et al: Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1976; 1:1031-1034