Implementing Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Structural Equation Models

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 157-167

  Cheung, Mike W L ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

meta analysis; multilevel modeling; restricted maximum likelihood estimation; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

LATENT VARIABLE MODELING; META-ANALYSIS; MULTILEVEL MODELING; MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;

ESTIMATION;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 84873347427     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2013.742404     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bauer, D. 2003. Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28: 135-167. doi: 10.3102/10769986028002135
2. Bentler, P. M. 2004. EQS 6 [Computer software] Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3. Berkey, C. S., Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F. and Colditz, G. A. 1995. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 14: 395-411. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780140406
4. Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., Spies, J., Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., Mehta, P. and Fox, J. 2011. OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76: 306-317. doi: 10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
5. Bollen, K. A. and Curran, P. 2006. Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
6. Cheung, M. W. L. 2008. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 13: 182-202. doi: 10.1037/a0013163
7. Cheung, M. W. L. 2010. Fixed-effects meta-analyses as multiple-group structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17: 481-509. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2010.489367
8. Cheung, M. W. L. 2012. metaSEM: Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach (R package version 0.8-0) Retrieved fromhttp://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/psycwlm/Internet/metaSEM/
9. Cheung, M. W. L. Multivariate meta-analysis as structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, (in press)
10. Chou, C.-P., Bentler, P. M. and Pentz, M. A. 1998. Comparisons of two statistical approaches to study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 5: 247 doi: 10.1080/10705519809540104
11. Colditz, G. A., Brewer, T. F., Berkey, C. S., Wilson, M. E., Burdick, E., Fineberg, H. V. and Mosteller, F. 1994. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 271: 698-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510330076038
12. Curran, P. 2003. Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38: 529-568. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5
13. Goldstein, H. 2011. Multilevel statistical models, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14. Harville, D. A. 1977. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72: 320-338. doi: 10.2307/2286796
15. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. 1996. LISREL 8: A user's reference guide Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
16. Laird, N. M. and Ware, J. H. 1982. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38: 963-974. doi: 10.2307/2529876
17. Lubke, G. H. and Muthén, B. 2005. Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10: 21-39. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
18. Mehta, P. D. and Neale, M. C. 2005. People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10: 259-284. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
19. Mehta, P. and West, S. 2000. Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5: 23-43. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.5.1.23
20. Muthén, B. 1984. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49: 115-132. doi: 10.1007/BF02294210
21. Muthén, B. O. and Muthén, L. K. 2012. Mplus user's guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22. Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58: 545-554. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.545
23. Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M. 2000. Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus New York, NY: Springer.
24. Potthoff, R. F. and Roy, S. N. 1964. A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems. Biometrika, 51: 313-326. doi: 10.1093/biomet/51.3-4.313
25. Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Raykov, T. 2001. Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8: 224 doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_4
27. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna, Austria: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.R-project.org/
28. Rovine, M. and Molenaar, P. 2000. A structural modeling approach to a multilevel random coefficients model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35: 51-88. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_3
29. Searle, S. R., Casella, G. and McCulloch, C. E. 1992. Variance components New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
30. Takane, Y. and Deleeuw, J. 1987. On the relationship between item response theory and factor-analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52: 393-408. doi: 10.1007/BF02294363
31. Viechtbauer, W. and Cheung, M. W. L. 2010. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1: 112-125. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.11