Ontologies for e-government

Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 429-462

  Hinkelmann, Knut ^a   Thönssen, Barbara ^a   Wolff, Daniela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873341515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_19     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Abecker A., A. Bernardi K. Hinkelmann O. Kühn and M. Sintek. 1998. Toward a well-founded technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 13(3
2. S40-48, May/June 1998. Reprint in The Knowledge Management Yearbook 1999-2000, eds. J.W. Cortada and J.A. Woods, 185-199. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
3. Borst P 1997. Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse, Phd thesis, Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente. http://purl.org/utwente/fid/1392. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
4. Business Rule Group. 2006. What is a business rule? http://www. businessrulesgroup.org/defnbrg. shtml. Retrieved, 05 Dec 2006
5. Capgemini Consulting. 2006. Online availability of public services: How is europe progressing? Web Based Survey on Electronic Public Services, Report of the 6th Measurement, June 2006. http://www.capgemini.com/resources/thought- leadership/2006-online-availability-of
6. Chappel O. 2006. Term-fact modeling, the key to successful rule-based systems. http://www.brcommunity.com/b250.php. Retrieved, 22 Nov 2006
7. Conklin J. and M. Begeman. 1998. gIBIS-A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In Proceedings of CSCW98, 140-152. Seattle, WA
8. Daconta M. C., L.J. Oberst and K.T. Smith. 2003. The semantic web. New York, NY: Wiley
9. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative 2006. DCMI metadata terms. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-Terms/. Retrieved, 23 Dec 2006
10. eCH. 2006. Best practice struktur prozessinventarliste. Standard Recommendation No. eCH-0015 of eCH eGovernment Standards. http://www.ech.ch/ index.php?option=com-docman&task=doc-download&gid=326. Retrieved, 5 Jan 2007
11. eCH. 2008. eCH-0049 Vernehmlassungseingaben Themenkatalog Privatpersonen. Standard Recommendation No. eCH-0049 plus addenda of eCH eGovernment Standards. http://ech. ch/index.php?option=com-docman&task=cat-view&gid= 118&Itemid=181&lang=de. Retrieved, 01 Sep 2008
12. Ferńndez-López M. and A. Gómez-Pérez. 2003. Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Cambridge Journals 17:129-156
13. Fernandez M., A. Gomez-Perez and N. Juristo. 1997. METHONTOLOGY: From ontological arts towards ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series on Ontological Engineering, 33-40. Stanford, CA
14. Fraser J., N. Adams A. Macintosh A. McKay-Hubbard T.P. Lobo P.F. Pardo R.C. Martínez, and J.S. Vallecillo. 2003. Knowledge management applied to egovernment services: The use of an ontology. Knowledge Management in Electronic Government: 4th IFIP International Working Conference, KMGov 2003, Rhodes, Greece, May 26-28, Procedings. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer
15. Gandits F. and R. Schaffer. 2006. Standardattribute für Leistungen und Leistungsgruppen. Recommendation of the Austrian e-Government Bund-Laaander-Gemeinden. http://reference.egovernment. gv.at/uploads/media/st- Att-1-0-0-2004-0102.pdf. Retrieved, 05 Jan 2007
16. Gómez-Pérez A. 2001. Evaluating ontologies. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/fulltext/77002631/PDFSTART. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
17. Gruber T.R. 1993a. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2):199-220
18. Gruber T.R. 1993b, Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In Formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation, eds. N. Guarino and R. Poli, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. For download at, http://www2.umassd.edu/SWAgents/agentdocs/stanford/ ontodesign.pdf. Retrieved, 05 Jan 2007
19. Grüninger M. and M.S. Fox. 1995. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/EIL/public/method.ps. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
20. Gugliotta A., V. Tanasescu J. Domingue R. Davies L. Gutiérrez- Villarías M. Rowlatt M. Richardson and S Stinčíc. 2006. Benefits and challenges of applying semantic web services in the e-Government domain. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/dip/resources/Semantics2006/ Semantics2006-DIP-Camera-Ready.pdf. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
21. Gugliotta A. 2006. Knowledge modelling for service-oriented applications in the e-Government domain. http://www.dimi.uniud.it/gugliott/thesisgugliotta. pdf. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
22. Swiss Federal Strategy Unit for Information Technology FSUIT. 2004. HERMES-Management and execution of projects in information and communication technologies (ICT). http://www.hermes.admin.ch/ict-project-management/ manualsutilities/manuals/hermes-foundations/at-download/file. Retrieved, 06 Jan 2007
23. Hinkelmann K., F. Probst and B. Thooonssen. 2006a. Reference modeling and lifecycle management for e-Government services. In eds. A. Abecker A. Sheth G. Mentzas and L. Stojanovic, Semantic Web Meets e-Government, Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, AAAI Technical Report SS-06-06
24. Hinkelmann K., F. Probst and B. Thooonssen. 2006b. Agile process management framework and methodology. In eds. A. Abecker A. Sheth G. Mentzas and L. Stojanovic, Semantic Web Meets e-Government, Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, AAAI Technical Report SS-06-06
25. Horrocks I., P. Patel-Schneider H. Boley S. Tabet B. Grosof and M. Dean. 2004. SWRL: A semantic web rule language, combining OWL and RuleML. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Retrieved, 08 Dec 2006
26. Chevallerau F.-X 2005. eGovernment in the member states of the European Union, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int/idabc/egovo. Retrieved, 05 Jan 2007
27. Kalfoglou Y. and M. Schorlemmer. 2005. Ontology mapping: The state of the art. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/40/pdf/04391.KalfoglouYannis. Paper.40.pdf. Retrieved, 25 Dec 2006
28. Kunz,W. and H.W.J. Rittel. 1970. Issues as elements of information systems. WP-131, University of California. http://www-iurd.ced.berkeley.edu/pub/ WP-131.pdf. Retrieved, 5 Dec 2005
29. Macias J.A. and P. Castells. 2004. Providing end-user facilities to simplify ontology-driven web application authoring. Interacting with Computers 19(4):563-585, July 2007
30. Maedche A. and S. Staab. 2004. Ontology learning. In Handbook on ontologies, eds. S. Staab, and R. Studer, 173-189. New York, NY: Springer
31. McGuinness D.L and F. Van Harmelen, eds. 2004. OWL web ontology language overview: W3C Recommendation 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
32. Noy N.F. and D.L. McGuinness. 2002. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology- development/ontology101.pdf. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
33. Martin D., ed. 2004. OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services. W3C Member Submission 22 Nov 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/. Retrieved, 06 Jan 2007
34. Peristeras V. and K. Tarabanis. 2006. Reengineering public administration through semantic technologies and the GEA domain ontology. AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Meets e-Government, Stanford University, March 2006. http://www.semanticgov. org/index.php?name=UpDownload&req=getit&lid=1. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
35. Pinto H.S. and J.P. Martins. 2002. Evolving ontologies in distributed and dynamic settings. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), eds. D. Fensel F. Giunchiglia D.L. McGuiness M.A. Williams, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
36. Pinto H.S. and J.P. Martins. 2004. Ontologies: How can they be built? Knowledge and Information Systems, Computer Science, 6(4). http://springerlink. metapress.com/content/0p5yqrdh5t5dvd06/fulltext.pdf. Retrieved, 16 Dec 2006
37. Wielinga. 1999. Knowledge engineering and management: The CommonKADS methodology. Cambridge, MA: MITPress
38. Stojanovic L., A. Abecker D. Apostolou G. Mentzas and R. Studer. 2006. The role of semantics in eGov service model verification and evolution. AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Meets e-Government, Stanford University, March 2006
39. Sure Y., M. Erdmann J. Angele S. Staab R. Studer and D.Wenke. 2002. OntoEdit: Collaborative ontolgy development for the semantic web. In International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2002, LNCS 2342, eds. I. Horrocks and J. Hendler, 221-235. Heidelberg: Springer. http://www.aifb.unikarlsruhe.de/WBS/ ysu/publications/2002-iswc-ontoedit.pdf. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006
40. Uschold M., M. King S. Moralee and Y. Zorgios. 1998. The enterprise ontology. Cambridge Journals 13:31-98
41. Uschold M. 1996. Building ontologies: Towards a unified methodology. Proceedings of Expert Systems 96, Cambridge, Dec 16-18 1996
42. Von Halle B. 2002. Business rules applied, building better systems using the business rules approach, New York, NY: Wiley
43. Wimmer M. and E. Tambouris. 2002. Online one-stop government: A working framework and requirements. In Proceedings of the IFIP World Computer Congress, Montreal, Aug 26-30
44. A. Wroe. 2006. TERREGOV white paper: Semantic based support to civil serVan ts. http://www.terregov.eupm.net/my-spip/index.php?param=12. Retrieved, 15 Dec 2006