Reengineering public administration through semantic technologies and a reference domain ontology

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-06-06, Issue , 2006, Pages 99-110

  Peristeras, Vassilios ^a   Tarabanis, Konstantinos ^a  

^a INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; DEPTH DOMAIN ANALYSIS; GOVERNANCE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE (GEA); REFERENCE DOMAIN ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC TECHNOLOGIES;

REENGINEERING;

EID: 33747184000     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Ake Grunlund (2005). What's In a Field - Exploring the eGovernment Domain. 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
2. Bercic, B. and M. Vintar (2003). Ontologies, Web Services, and Intelligent Agents: Ideas for Further Development of Life-Event Portals. EGOV 2003, LNCS 2739. R. Traunmuller. Berlin, Springer-Verlag
3. Bevir, M. and R. A. W. Rhodes (2001). A Decentered Theory of Governance. Berkeley, Institute of Governmental Studies.
4. Brahim Medjahed, Abdelmounaam Rezgui, et al. (2003). "Infrastructure for E-Govemment Web Services." IEEE Internet Computing 7(1): 58-65.
5. Claudio Masolo, Stefano Borgo, et al. (2003). WonderWeb: Deliverable D1.8, Ontology Library (IST Project 2001-33052).
6. D. Apostolou, et al. (2005). Towards a Semantically-Driven Software Engineering Environment for eGovemment, LNAI. 3416.
7. Dietz,J., J.Mulder (1998). Organizational transformation requires constructional knowledge of business systems. 31st HICCS, IEEE Press.
8. Dimitrios Tektonidis, et al. (2005). ONAR: An ontologies-based service oriented application integration framework. 1st Int Conf. on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, Geneva.
9. DIP Project (2004). D9.3 e-Government ontology
10. European Commission (2004). DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 April 2004 on interoperable delivery of pan-European eGovemment services to public administrations, businesses and citizens (IDABC). 2004/387/EC.
11. Fowler, M. (1997). Analysis Patterns, Addison-Wesley.
12. Gartner (2003). New Performance Framework Measures Public Value of IT, Research Note, 8 July 2003.
13. Gpldkuhl, G. (1996). Generic business frameworks and action modeling. 1st International Workshop on Communications Modeling - The Language/Action Perspective, Springer Verlag.
14. H. Koontz, C. O. Donnell, et al. (1980). Management. McGraw Hill.
15. Hogwood, B. W. and L. A. Gunn (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
16. IDABC (2004). European Interoperability Framework. Luxembourg.
17. Inter-Agency Benchmarking & Best Practices Council (1996). Government Process Classification Scheme.
18. Johannesson, P. (2001). A Language/Action based Approach to Information Modeling. Information Modeling in the new Millenium, Rossi M. and Siau K., IDEA Publishing.
19. Klischewski, R. (2004). Semantic Web for e-Government - a Research Agenda. AIS SIG SEMIS Newsletter Volume 1, Issue 1.
20. Lane, J.-E. (1995). The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches, Sage Publications.
21. Lind M. and G. Goldkuhl (2001). Generic Layered Patterns for Business Modeling. 6th International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling, Montreal, Canada.
22. M. Paolucci et al. (2002). Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. The SemanticWeb-ISWC 2002:
23. Mayer-Kress, G. Messy Features and Global Brains. Nov. 1999.
24. Niles, I. and A. Pease (2001). Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001), Ogunquit, Maine.
25. Office of e-Envoy UK (2002). e-Services Development Framework v1.0b.
26. Peristeras, V., T. Tsekos, et al. (2003). Building Domain Models for the (e) Governance System. PBTA "03, Orlando, USA.
27. Peristeras V. (2006). The Governance Enterprise Architecture - GEA - for Reengineering Public Administration, PhD Dissertation. Business School Department. Thessaloniki, University of Macedonia.
28. Peristeras V. and Tarabanis K. (2004). Advancing the Government Enterprise Architecture - GEA: The Service Execution Object Model. Electronic Government, DEXA, 3rd International Conference EGOV 2004, Zaragoza, LNCS 3183. R. Traunmuller, Springer: 476-482.
29. Peristeras V. and Tarabanis K. (2004). The Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) Object Model. Knowledge Management in Electronic Government, LNCS 3035, (5tn IFIP Inter. Working Conference, KMGov 2004, Krems, Austria, May 27-29). M. A. Wimmer, Springer: 101-110.
30. Peristeras V. and Tarabanis K. (2005). The GEA Generic Process Model for Public Administration Service Execution. 8th BIS, Poznan.
31. Peristeras V. and Tarabanis K. (2005). Providing Pan-European eGovemment Services with the use of Semantic Web Service Technologies: A Generic Process Model. Electronic Government, DEXA, 4th International Conference EGOV 2005, Copenhagen.
32. Rhodes, R.A.W.(1997). Understanding Governance, Open University Press
33. Riley, B. T. (2003). e-Govemment vs. e-Govemance. Ottawa, Commonwealth Centre for E-Governance.
34. Rosati, L., et al. (2004). "Faceted Classification for Public Administration.". 1st Italian Semantic Web Workshop, Ancona
35. SAP (2000). R/3 System SAP Solution Map.
36. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, London, Cambridge University Press.
37. Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis, University of Minesota.
38. Semy, S. K., M. K. Pulvermacher, et al. (2004). Toward the Use of an Upper Ontology for U.S. Government and U.S. Military Domains: An Evaluation, The MITRE Corporation.
39. Tambouris E. (2001). An Integrated platform for Realizing Online One-Stop Government: The eGov Project DEXA Inter. Workshop "On the Way to E-Government", CA, IEEE Computer Society Press.
40. Tarabanis, K. and V. Peristeras (2000). 'Towards an Enterprise Architecture for Public Administration: A Top Down Approach." European Journal of Information Systems 9(Dec. 2000): 252-260.
41. Tarabanis, K., V. Peristeras, et al. (2001). Building an Enterprise Architecture for Public Administration: A High Level Data Model for Strategic Planning. 9th ECIS, Bled, Slovenia.
42. Tarabanis K. and Peristeras V. (2003). Knowledge Management Requirements for Pan-European Public Administration Service Delivery. Knowledge Management in Electronic Government: 4th KMGov 2003. Rhodes, Greece, May 26-28, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg. 2645.
43. The World Bank (1992). Governance and Development. Washington TopQuadrant (2005). FEA Refererence Model Ontologies, v1.1.
44. Taunmuller, R. and M. Wimmer (2002). KM for Public Administration: Focusing on KMS Feature Requirements. Berlin Heidelberg 2002, Springer-Verlag. LNAI 2569: 314-325.
45. Weigand H., van den Heuvel W., et al. (1998). Modelling Electronic Commerce Transactions - A Layered Approach. 3rd Inter. Workshop, The Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling.
46. Zachman, J., J. Sowa (1992). "Extending & formalizing the framework for IS architecture." IBM Systems Journal 31(3).