Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 266-273

  Horváth, János ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Cognition; EEG ERP; Normal volunteers; Sensation perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873309577     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aliu, S. O., Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2009). Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 791-802. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21055.
2. Baess, P., Horváth, J., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2011). Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 48, 1276-1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01196.x.
3. Baess, P., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2008). Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: Evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70, 137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.005.
4. Curio, G., Neuloh, G., Numminen, J., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (2000). Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 183-191. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200004)9:4<183::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
5. Ford, J. M., Gray, M., Faustman, W. O., Roach, B. J., & Mathalon, D. H. (2007). Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology, 44, 522-529. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00533.x.
6. Ford, J. M., & Mathalon, D. H. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 38, 37-46. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00095-5.
7. Ford, J. M., Mathalon, D. H., Kalba, S., Whitfield, S., Faustman, W. O., & Roth, W. T. (2001). Cortical responsiveness during talking and listening in schizophrenia: An event-related brain potential study. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 540-549. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01166-0.
8. Glasberg, B. R., & Moore, B. C. J. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research, 47, 103-138. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90170-T.
9. Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 277290. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90222-9.
10. Hazemann, P., Audin, G., & Lille, F. (1975). Effect of voluntary self-paced movements upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 247-254. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90146-7.
11. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Gray, M., & Ford, J. M. (2005). Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology, 42, 180-190. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00272.x.
12. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2006). Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. NeuroReport, 17, 1375-1379. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000233102.43526.e9.
13. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177-180. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4108.177.
14. Horváth, J., Maess, B., Baess, P., & Tóth, A. (2012). Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1919-1931. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00215.
15. Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83, 229-238. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.004.
16. Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1125-1138. doi: 10.1162/089892902760807140.
17. Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (in press). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: The role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin. doi: 10.1037/a0028566.
18. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
19. Knolle, F., Schröger, E., Baess, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2012). The cerebellum generates motor-to-auditory predictions: ERP lesion evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 698-706. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00167.
20. Martikainen, M. H., Kaneko, K., & Hari, R. (2005). Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 299-302. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh131.
21. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effects of temporal and event uncertainty in determining the waveforms of the auditory event related potential (ERP). Psychophysiology, 13, 581-590. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00885.x.
22. Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9, 1265-1279. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4.
23. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x.
24. Numminen, J., & Curio, G. (1999). Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 272, 29-32. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00573-X.
25. Okamoto, H., Stracke, H., Wolters, C. H., Schmael, F., & Pantev, C. (2007). Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 27, 10383-10390. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2963-07.2007.
26. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6.
27. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1990). Corrigendum. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76, 565.
28. Polich, J., 2007. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
29. Rif, J., Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Sams, M. (1991). Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 79, 464-472. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90166-2.
30. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Friedman, D. (1979). A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science, 203, 1358-1361. doi: 10.1126/science.424760.
31. Schäfer, E. W., & Marcus, M. M. (1973). Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science, 181, 175-177. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4095.175.
32. Schwent, V. L., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1976). Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. II. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 40, 615-622. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(76)90136-X.
33. Sowman, P. F., Kuusik, A., & Johnson, B. W. (2012). Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2. Experimental Brain Research, 222, 149-157. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3204-7.
34. Sperry, R. W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43, 482-489. doi: 10.1037/h0055479.
35. Ventura, M. I., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2009). Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-58.
36. von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip [The principle of reafference]. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464-476. doi: 10.1007/BF00622503.