Mismatch negativity does not show evidence of memory reactivation in the visual modality

Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-6

  Sulykos, István ^a,b   Kecskés Kovács, Krisztina ^a,c   Czigler, István ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Change positivity; Reactivation; Roving standard paradigm; Visual mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEMORY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84873300162     PISSN: 02698803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000085     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berti, S. (2011). The attentional blink demonstrates automatic deviance processing in vision. Neuroreport, 22, 664-667.
2. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 909-921.
3. Czigler, I. (2007). Visual mismatch negativity: Violation of nonattended environmental regularities. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 224-230.
4. Czigler, I., & Pató, L. (2009). Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity. Biological Psychology, 80, 339-347.
5. Czigler, I., Weisz, J., & Winkler, I. (2006). ERPs and deviance detection: Visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 401, 178-182.
6. Fu, S., Fan, S., & Chen, L. (2003). Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality. Psychophysiology, 40, 770-775.
7. Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Cheng, J. (2001). The effect of perceptual grouping on the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 38, 316-324.
8. Kimura, M., Katayama, J., & Murohashi, H. (2005). Positive difference in ERPs reflects independent processing of visual changes. Psychophysiology, 42, 369-379.
9. Kimura, M., Katayama, J., & Murohashi, H. (2006). Probabilityindependent and -dependent ERPs reflecting visual change detection. Psychophysiology, 43, 180-189.
10. Kimura, M., Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Duration of predictive models underlying the generation of visual mismatch negativity. Manuscript in preparation.
11. Leff, A. (2004). A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing. Brain and Language, 88, 268-278.
12. Maekawa, T., Tobimatsu, S., Ogata, K., Onitsuka, T., & Kanba, S. (2009). Preattentive visual change detection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)-evidence for a memorybased process. Neuroscience Research, 65, 107-112.
13. Mangun, G. R., Buonocore, H. M., Girelli, M., & Jha, A. P. (1998). ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 383-389.
14. Ritter, W., Gomes, H., Cowan, N., Sussman, E., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998). Reactivation of a dormant representation of an auditory stimulus feature. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 605-614.
15. Ritter, W., Sussman, E., Molholm, S., & Foxe, J. J. (2002). Memory reactivation or reinstatement the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 39, 158-165.
16. Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138-146.
17. Sulykos, I., & Czigler, I. (2011). One plus one is less than two: Visual features elicit non-additive mismatch-related brain activity. Brain Research, 1398, 64-71.
18. Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2002). The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology, 39, 791-808.
19. Wang, Y., Tian, S., Wang, H., Cui, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2003). Event-related potentials evoked by multi-feature conflict under different attentive conditions. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 451-457.
20. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147-163.
21. Winkler, I., & Cowan, N. (2005). From sensory to long-term memory: Evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies. Experimental Psychology, 52, 3-20.
22. Winkler, I., Cowan, N., Csépe, V., Czigler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Interactions between transient and long-term auditory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 403-415.
23. Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Sussman, E., Horváth, J. & Balázs, L (2005) Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 320-339.
24. Winkler, I., Korzyukov, O., Gomenyuk, V., Cowan, N., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (2002). Temporary and longer term retention of acoustic information. Psychophysiology, 39, 530-534.
25. Winkler, I., Schröger, E., & Cowan, N. (2001). The role of largescale memory organization in the mismatch negativity eventrelated brain potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 59-71.