Reactivation of a dormant representation of an auditory stimulus feature

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 605-614

  Ritter, Walter ^a   Gomes, Hilary ^a   Cowan, Nelson ^b   Sussman, Elyse ^a   Vaughan Jr , Herbert G ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUTOMATION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 0031731635     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892998563004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38-51.
2. Aulanko, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., Näätänen, R., & Sams, M. (1993). Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. NeuroReport, 4, 1356-1358.
3. Böttcher-Gandor, C., & Ullsperger, P. (1992). Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials to auditory stimuli as a function of varying interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 29, 546-550.
4. Cowan, N. (1984). On short and long auditory stores. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 341-370.
5. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of the mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 909-921.
6. Crowder, R. G. (1993). Short-term memory: Where do we stand? Memory and Cognition, 21, 142-145.
7. Czigler, I., Csibra, G., & Csontos, A. (1992). Age and interstimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biological Psychology, 33, 195-206.
8. Czigler, I., & Winkler, I. (1996). Preattentive auditory change detection relies on unitary sensory memory representations. NeuroReport, 7, 2413-2417.
9. Glenberg, A. M. (1987). Temporal context and memory. In D. S. Gorfein, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 173-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gomes, H., Bernstein, R., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Miller, J. (1997). Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. Psychophysiology, 34, 712-716.
11. Gomes, H., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The nature of pre-attentive storage in the auditory system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 81-94.
12. Gomes, H., Sussman, E., Ritter, W., Kurtzberg, D., Cowan, N., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (in press). Electrophysiological evidence of developmental changes in the duration of auditory sensory memory. Devlopmental Psychology.
13. Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14. Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Lavikainen, J., Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Sinkkonen, J., Knuutila, J., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Interaction between representations of different features of auditory sensory memory. NeuroReport, 4, 1279-1281.
15. Levänen, S., Hari, R., McEvoy, L., & Sams, M. (1993). Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 177-183.
16. Mäntysalo, S., & Näätänen, R. (1987). The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 24, 183-195.
17. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Näätänen, R., Pauvilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Sams, M. (1987). Inter-stimulus interval and the mismatch negativity. In C. Barber & T. Blum (Eds.), Evoked potentials III (pp. 125-131). London: Butterworth.
19. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (submitted). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.
20. Neath, L., & Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 316-327.
21. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, D., Javitt, D. C., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review. Ear and Hearing, 16, 52-67.
22. Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. NeuroReport, 3, 1149-1151.
23. Sams, M., Hari, R., Rif, J., & Knuutila, J. (1993). The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s: Neuromagnetic evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 363-370.
24. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., & Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 336-355.
25. Schröger, E. (1995). Processing of auditory deviants in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology, 32, 55-65.
26. Schröger, E. (1996). The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100, 517-526.
27. Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory change detection: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245-257.
28. Schröger, E., Näätänen, R., & Paavilainen, P. (1992). Event-related potentials reveal how non-attended complex sound patterns are represented by the human brain. Neuroscience Letters, 146, 183-186.
29. Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (1995). Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. Neuroscience Letters, 193, 185-188.
30. Sussman, E., Gomes, H., Nousak, J. M., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (in press). Feature conjunctions and auditory sensory memory. Brain Research.
31. Tervaniemi, M., Maury, S., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 5, 844-846.
32. Winkler, I. (1993). Mismatch negativity: An event-related brain potential measure of auditory sensory memory traces. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
33. Winkler, I., Cowan, N., Csépe, V., Czigler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Interactions between transient and long-term auditory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 403-415.
34. Winkler, I., Karmos, G., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Research, 742, 239-252.
35. Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., & Näätänen, R. (1990). The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psychophysiology, 27, 228-235.