Correction for collimator-detector response in SPECT using point spread function template

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 295-305

  Chun, Se Young ^a   Fessler, Jeffrey A ^a   Dewaraja, Yuni K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

B spline point spread function template; collimator detector response; I 131 quantitative SPECT

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; B-SPLINE; COLLIMATOR-DETECTOR RESPONSE; DEPTH DEPENDENTS; DETECTOR COMPONENTS; EXPONENTIAL MODELS; GAUSSIAN FUNCTIONS; GAUSSIAN MODEL; GAUSSIANS; GEOMETRIC RESPONSE; HIGH ENERGY PHOTONS; I-131 QUANTITATIVE SPECT; MC SIMULATION; MEASURED POINTS; MODEL YIELDS; MONTE CARLO; NON-PARAMETRIC; PHANTOM MEASUREMENTS; POINT SOURCES; RECOVERY COEFFICIENTS; SEPTAL PENETRATION; SIMULATION STUDIES; SOURCE-DETECTOR DISTANCE;

EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GEOMETRY; INTERPOLATION; OPTICAL DESIGN; OPTICAL TRANSFER FUNCTION;

DETECTORS;

RADIOISOTOPE;

ARTICLE; COLLIMATOR; COLLIMATOR DETECTOR; KERNEL METHOD; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOM; PHOTON; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TEACHING; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSDUCER;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TRANSDUCERS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873291125     PISSN: 02780062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2225441     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. B. M. W. Tsui, E. C. Frey, X. Zhao, D. S. Lalush, R. E. Johnston, and W. H. McCartney, The importance and implementation of accurate 3d compensation methods for quantitative SPECT, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 509-530, 1994. (Pubitemid 24149130)
2. M. Ljungberg, K. Sjogreen, X. Liu, E. Frey, Y. Dewaraja, and S.-E. Strand, A 3-dimensional absorbed dose calculation method based on quantitative SPECT for radionuclide therapy: Evaluation for 131I using Monte Carlo simulation, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1101-1109, 2002. (Pubitemid 34847935)
3. B. He, Y. Du, X. Song, W. P. Segars, and E. C. Frey, A Monte Carlo and physical phantom evaluation of quantitative in-111 SPECT, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 4169-4186, Sep. 2005.
4. Y. K. Dewaraja, S. J. Wilderman, M. Ljungberg, K. F. Koral, K. Zasadny, andM. S. Kaminiski, Accurate dosimetry in 131I radionuclide therapy using patient-specific, 3-dimensional methods for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose calculation, J. Nucl.Med., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 840-849, 2005.
5. A. Larsson, M. Ljungberg, S. J. Mo, K. Riklund, and L. Johansson, Correction for scatter and septal penetration using convolution subtraction methods and model-based compensation in 123 i brain SPECT imaging-A Monte Carlo study, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 51, no. 22, pp. 5753-5767, 2006. (Pubitemid 46217666)
6. J. Moody, Y. K. Dewaraja, and E. P. Ficaro, Resolution and noise properties of 123I-MIBG SPECT with collimator-detector response modeling, in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec.., Oct. 2011, pp. 2779-2786.
7. Y. K. Dewaraja, M. Ljungberg, and K. F. Koral, Characterization of scatter and penetration usingMonte Carlo simulation in 131I imaging, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 123-130, Jan. 2000. (Pubitemid 30046694)
8. Y. Du, B.M.W. Tsui, and E. C. Frey, Model-based compensation for quantitative 123 I brain SPECT imaging, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1269-1269, 2006.
9. A. Cot, E. Jane, J. Sempau, C. Falcon, S. Bullich, J. Pavia, F. Calvino, and D. Ros, Modeling of high-energy contamination in SPECT imaging using Monte Carlo simulation, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 198-203, Feb. 2006.
10. S. C. Moore, J. Ouyang, M.-A. Park, and G. E. Fakhri, Monte Carlo-based compensation for patient scatter, detector scatter, and crosstalk contamination in In-111 SPECT imaging, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel, Spect., Detectors Assoc. Equip., vol. 569, no. 2, pp. 472-476, 2006. (Pubitemid 44820473)
11. S. Staelens, T. deWit, and F. Beekman, Fast hybrid SPECT simulation including efficient septal penetration modelling (SP-PSF), Phys.Med. Biol., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3027-3043, 2007. (Pubitemid 46795245)
12. C. E. Metz, F. B. Atkins, and R. N. Beck, The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 242-250, Nov. 1980.
13. E. C. Frey and B. M. W. Tsui, Collimator-detector response compensation in SPECT, in Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging, H. Zaidi, Ed. New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 141-166.
14. S. Liu and T. H. Farncombe, Collimator-detector response compensation in quantitative SPECT reconstruction, in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., Nov. 2007, vol. 5, pp. 3955-3960.
15. X. Song, W. P. Segars, Y. Du, B. M. W. Tsui, and E. C. Frey, Fast modelling of the collimator-detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1791-1804, 2005. (Pubitemid 41223649)
16. K. Assie, I. Gardin, P. Vera, and I. Buvat, Validation of the Monte Carlo simulator GATE for Indium-111 imaging,Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 50, pp. 3113-3125, 2005. (Pubitemid 40905188)
17. E. Rault, S. Staelens, R. V. Holen, J. D. Beenhouwer, and S. Vandenberghe, Fast simulation of yttrium-90 bremsstrahlung photons with GATE, Med. Phys., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2943-2950, 2010.
18. K. F. Koral, A. Yendiki, Q. Lin, Y. K. Dewaraja, and J. A. Fessler, Determining total I-131 activity within a VoI using SPECT, a UHE collimator, OSEM, and a constant conversion factor, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 611-618, Jun. 2004.
19. L. Furenlid, D. Wilson, Y. C. Chen,H.Kim, P. Pietraski,M.Crawford, and H. Barrett, FastSPECT II: A second-generation high-resolution dynamic SPECT imager, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 631-635, Jun. 2004.
20. F. van der Have, B. Vastenhouw, R. M. Ramakers, W. Branderhorst, J. O. Krah, C. Ji, S. G. Staelens, and F. J. Beekman, U-SPECT-II: An ultra-high-resolution device for molecular small-animal imaging, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 599-605, Apr. 2009.
21. Y. K. Dewaraja, M. Ljungberg, and J. A. Fessler, 3-D Monte Carlobased scatter compensation in quantitative I-131 SPECT reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 181-188, Feb. 2006.
22. T. F. Coleman and Y. Li, An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds, SIAM J. Optim., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 418-445, 1996.
23. M. Unser, A. Aldroubi, and M. Eden, B-spline signal processing: Part I-Theory, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 821-833, Feb. 1993. (Pubitemid 23609295)
24. D. Liu and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory method for large scale optimization, Math. Programm. B, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 503-528, 1989. (Pubitemid 20660315)
25. M. Ljungberg and S.-E. Strand, A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 257-272, 1989. (Pubitemid 20610320)
26. G. L. Zeng and G. T. Gullberg, Frequency domain implementation of the three-dimensional geometric point response correction in SPECT imaging, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1444-1453, Oct. 1992. (Pubitemid 23608543)
27. Y. K. Dewaraja, M. J. Schipper, P. L. Roberson, S. J. Wilderman, H. Amro, D. D. Regan, K. F. Koral, M. S. Kaminski, and A. M. Avram, 131I-tositumomab radioimmunotherapy: Initial tumor dose-response results using 3-dimensional dosimetry including radiobiologic modeling, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1155-1162, 2010.
28. W. P. Segars, M. Mahesh, T. J. Beck, E. C. Frey, and B. M.W. Tsui, Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom, Med. Phys., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 3800-3808, Aug. 2008.
29. J. A. Fessler and W. L. Rogers, Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction methods: Space-invariant tomographs, IEEE Trans. Imag. Process., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1346-1358, Sep. 1996. (Pubitemid 126782391)
30. C. Ji, F. van der Have, H. G. van Andela, R. Ramakers, and F. Beekman, Accurate coregistration between ultra-high-resolution micro-SPECT and circular cone-beam micro-CT scanners, Int. J. Biomed. Imag., vol. 2010, no. 2010, pp. 12-12, 2010.
31. Y. K. Dewaraja, K. F. Koral, and J. A. Fessler, Regularized reconstruction in quantitative SPECT using CT side information fromhybrid imaging, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2523-2529, May 2010.