메뉴 건너뛰기
American Economic Review
Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 501-509
Submission fees and response times in academic publishing
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 84873284665     PISSN: 00028282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.501     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (27)
References (15)
  • 1
    • 27744607186 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The review process in economics: Is it too fast?
    • Azar, Ofer H. 2005. "The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast?" Southern Economic Journal 72 (2): 482-91.
    • (2005) Southern Economic Journal , vol.72 , Issue.2 , pp. 482-491
    • Azar, O.H.1
  • 2
    • 85106588524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The academic review process: How can we make it more efficient?
    • Azar, Ofer H. 2006. "The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make It More Efficient?" American Economist 50 (1): 37-50.
    • (2006) American Economist , vol.50 , Issue.1 , pp. 37-50
    • Azar, O.H.1
  • 3
    • 33847294669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The slowdown in first-response times of economics journals: Can it be beneficial?
    • Azar, Ofer H. 2007. "The Slowdown in First-Response Times of Economics Journals: Can it Be Beneficial?" Economic Inquiry 45 (1): 179-87.
    • (2007) Economic Inquiry , vol.45 , Issue.1 , pp. 179-187
    • Azar, O.H.1
  • 4
    • 39149100633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process
    • Azar, Ofer H. 2008. "Evolution of Social Norms with Heterogeneous Preferences: A General Model and an Application to the Academic Review Process." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 65 (3-4): 420-35.
    • (2008) Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , vol.65 , Issue.3-4 , pp. 420-435
    • Azar, O.H.1
  • 5
    • 0000268096 scopus 로고
    • The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the american economic review
    • Blank, Rebecca M. 1991. "The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review." American Economic Review 81 (5): 1041-67.
    • (1991) American Economic Review , vol.81 , Issue.5 , pp. 1041-1067
    • Blank, R.M.1
  • 6
    • 0035647536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is it worthwhile to pay referees?
    • Chang, Juin-jen, and Ching-chong Lai. 2001. "Is It Worthwhile to Pay Referees?" Southern Economic Journal 68 (2): 457-63.
    • (2001) Southern Economic Journal , vol.68 , Issue.2 , pp. 457-463
    • Chang, J.-J.1    Lai, C.2
  • 7
    • 0036804675 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory
    • Ellison, Glenn. 2002a. "Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q-r Theory." Journal of Political Economy 110 (5): 994-1034.
    • (2002) Journal of Political Economy , vol.110 , Issue.5 , pp. 994-1034
    • Ellison, G.1
  • 8
    • 0036806324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The slowdown of the economics publishing process
    • Ellison, Glenn. 2002b. "The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process." Journal of Political Economy 110 (5): 947-93.
    • (2002) Journal of Political Economy , vol.110 , Issue.5 , pp. 947-993
    • Ellison, G.1
  • 9
    • 79959717397 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is peer review in decline?
    • Ellison, Glenn. 2011. "Is Peer Review in Decline?" Economic Inquiry 49 (3): 635-57.
    • (2011) Economic Inquiry , vol.49 , Issue.3 , pp. 635-657
    • Ellison, G.1
  • 10
    • 0002273465 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why referees are not paid (enough)
    • Engers, Maxim, and Joshua S. Gans. 1998. "Why Referees Are Not Paid (Enough)." American Economic Review 88 (5): 1341-49.
    • (1998) American Economic Review , vol.88 , Issue.5 , pp. 1341-1349
    • Engers, M.1    Gans, J.S.2
  • 12
    • 84937314537 scopus 로고
    • Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors
    • Laband, David N., and Michael J. Piette. 1994. "Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors." Journal of Political Economy 102 (1): 194-203.
    • (1994) Journal of Political Economy , vol.102 , Issue.1 , pp. 194-203
    • Laband, D.N.1    Piette, M.J.2
  • 13
    • 20444398554 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are delays in academic publishing necessary?
    • Leslie, Derek. 2005. "Are Delays in Academic Publishing Necessary?" American Economic Review 95 (1): 407-13.
    • (2005) American Economic Review , vol.95 , Issue.1 , pp. 407-413
    • Leslie, D.1
  • 14
    • 33747424416 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open access and academic journal quality
    • McCabe, Mark J., and Christopher M. Snyder. 2005. "Open Access and Academic Journal Quality." American Economic Review 95 (2): 453-58.
    • (2005) American Economic Review , vol.95 , Issue.2 , pp. 453-458
    • McCabe, M.J.1    Snyder, C.M.2
  • 15
    • 0040020463 scopus 로고
    • The optimal order for submitting manuscripts
    • Oster, Sharon. 1980. "The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts." American Economic Review 70 (3): 444-48.
    • (1980) American Economic Review , vol.70 , Issue.3 , pp. 444-448
    • Oster, S.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.