Employment-related psychological evaluations: Risk management concerns and current practices

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 18-31

  Rybicki, Daniel J ^a   Nutter, Randolph A ^b  

^a City of Los Angeles Personnel   (United States)

^b Ventura Country Sheriff   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873276855     PISSN: 08820783     EISSN: 19366469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02807112     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen, M. G., Hibler, N. S., & Presant, N. L. (2000). Psychiatric evaluations by the Federal Occupational Health procedures. The Forensic Examiner, 9(11-12), 13-18.
2. Archibald, E. M. (1986). Confidentiality when the police psychologist is evaluator and caregiving practitioner. In: J. T. Reese and H. A. Goldstein (Eds.), Psychological services for law enforcement (pp. 215-217). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
3. th Annual Convention of the American Pscyhological Association, San Francisco, CA.
4. Archibald, E. M. (1995). Managing professional concerns in the delivery of psychological services to the police. In M. I. Kurke, and E. M. Scrivner (Eds.), Police psychology into the 21st, century. Hilldale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Benner, A. W. (1997). Determining the need for fitness for duty evaluations. Police Chief, 64(4), 141-143.
6. Harris, J. J., & Gilmartin, K. M. (2000). Malcontent and disgruntled employees: What is a supervisor to do?The Police Chief, 67(12), 19-25.
7. Hibler N. S., & Kurke, M. I. Ensuring personal reliability through selection and training. In M. I. Kurke, & E. M. Scrivner (Eds.), Police psychology into the 21st, century. Hilldale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. IACP Psychological Services Section (1998). Fitness for duty guidelines. Police Chief, 65(10), 106-107.
9. Inwald, R. (1990). Proposed fitness for duty evaluation guidelines. Criminal Justice Digest, 9(8), 1-4.
10. Inwald, R. E., & Shusman, E. J. (1984). The IPI and MMPI as predictors of academy performance for police recruits. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 1-11.
11. Reese, J. T. (1995). A history of police psychological services. In M. I. Kurke, & E. M. Scrivner (Eds.). Police psychology into the 21st. century. Hilldale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Rieser, M. (1972a). The police department psychologist, Springfield, IL. Thomas.
13. Rieser, M. (1972b). Polica psychology: Collected papers. Los Angeles: Lehi Publication.
14. Saxe-Clifford, S. (1986). The fitness for duty evaluation: Establishing policy. Police Chief, 53(2), 8-39.
15. Scrivner, E. M., & Kurke, M. I. (1995). Police psychology at the dawn of the 21st century. In M. I. Kurke, and E. M. Scrivner (Eds.), Police psychology into the 21st, century. Hilldale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Stone, A. V. (1995). Law enforcement psychological fitness for duty: Clinical issues. In M. I. Kurke, & E. M. Scrivner (Eds.), Police psychology into the 21st, century. Hilldale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Super, J. T. (1997). Select legal and ethical aspects of fitness for duty evaluations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25(3).
18. Trompetter, P. S. (1998). Fitness for duty evaluations: What police agencies can expect. Police Chief, 65(10), 97-105.