Select legal and ethical aspects of fitness for duty evaluations

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 223-229

  Super, John T ^a  

^a Manatee County Sheriff's Office   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031521372     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(97)00007-X     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 47(12):1597-1611.
3. Blau, T. H. (1994). Psychological services for law enforcement. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Inwald, R. (1990). Proposed fitness for duty evaluation guidelines developed. Criminal Justice Digest 9(8):1-4.
5. Ostrov, E., Nowick, D. E., and Beazley, J. P. (1987). Mandatory police evaluations: The Chicago model. Police Chief 54(2):30-35.
6. Saxe-Clifford. S. (1986). The fitness for duty evaluation: Establishing policy. Police Chief 53(2):38-39.
7. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. (1991). Law and Human Behavior 15(6).
8. Standards for educational and psychological testing. (1985). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Stone, A. V. (1990). Psychological fitness for duty evaluations. Police Chief 57(2):39-53.