Use of geometric morphometric data for a phylogenetic classification, application to the origin of Homo sapiens in Asia;Morphométrie géométrique et classification phylogénétique, application à la question de l'origine d'Homo sapiens en Asie

Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris

Volumn 22, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 172-184

  Bouee, S ^a   Detroit, F ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Asia; Cladistic; Geometric morphometric; Homo erectus; Phenetic; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873247764     PISSN: 00378984     EISSN: 17775469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13219-010-0018-7     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Bräuer G (1992) Africa's place in the evolution of Homo sapiens. In: Bräuer G (ed) Homo Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens evolution. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 83-98.
2. Wolpoff MH (2000) Multiregional, not multiple origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 112: 129-36.
3. Hublin JJ (1986) Some comments on the diagnostic features of Homo erectus. Anthropos Brno 23: 175-87.
4. Rightmire GP (1986) Species recognition and Homo erectus. J Hum Evol 15: 823-6.
5. Turner A, Chamberlain A (1989) Speciation, morphological change and the status of African Homo erectus. J Hum Evol 18: 115-30.
6. Bräuer G (1990) The occurrence of some controversial Homo erectus cranial features in the Zhoukoudian and East African hominids. Acta Anthropologica Sinica 9: 350-8.
7. Bräuer G, Mbua E (1992) Homo erectus features used in cladistics and their variability in Asian and African hominids. J Hum Evol 22: 79-108.
8. Wolpoff MH, Hawks J, Frayer DW, et al (2001) Modern human ancestry at the peripheries: a test of the replacement theory. Science 291: 293-7.
9. Bräuer G (2002) Homo ergaster et son statut taxinomique. In: Grimaud-Hervé D, Marchal F, Vialet A, Détroit F (eds) Le deuxième homme en Afrique. Errance, Paris, pp 116-23.
10. Detroit F (2002) Origine et évolution des Homo sapiens en Asie du Sud-est: description et analyse morphométriques de nouveaux fossiles. Thèse de doctorat du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, 444 p.
11. Jacob T (1978) The puzzle of Solo Man. Modern Quaternary Research in South East Asia 4: 31-40.
12. Santa Luca AP (1980) The Ngandong fossils hominid. A comparative study of a far Eastern Homo erectus group. Yale University Publications in Anthropology 78: 1-175.
13. Storm P (1998) Life and death of Homo erectus in Australasia: an environmental approach to the fate of paleospecies. In: Sémah F, Falguères C, Grimaud-Hervé D, Sémah AM (eds) Origine des peuplements et chronologie des cultures paléolithiques dans le Sud-est asiatique. Semenanjung-Art'Com, Paris, pp 279-98.
14. Thorne AG, Wolpoff MH (1981) Regional continuity in australasian pleistocene hominid evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 55: 337-49.
15. Tobias P (1985) Single characters and the total morphological pattern redefined: the sorting effected by a selection of morphological features of the early hominids. In: Delson E (ed) Ancestors: the hard evidence. A. R. Liss, New York, pp 94-101.
16. Hawks J, Oh S, Hunley K, et al (2000) An Australasian test of the recent African origin theory using the WLH- 50 calvarium. J Hum Evol 39: 1-22.
17. Wu X, Poirier FE (1995) Human evolution in China, Oxford University Press, New-York, Oxford 317 p.
18. Etler DA (1996) The fossil evidence for human evolution in Asia. Annu Rev Anthropol 25: 275-301.
19. Wu X (2004) On the origin of modern humans in China. Quat Int 117: 131-40.
20. Kramer A, Donnelly SM, Kidder JH, et al (1995) Craniometric variation in large-bodied hominoids: testing the single-species hypothesis for Homo habilis. J Hum Evol 29: 443-62.
21. Kramer A, Konigsberg LW (1999) Recognizing species diversity among large-bodied hominoids: a simulation test using missing data finite mixture analysis. J Hum Evol 36: 409-21.
22. Donnelly SM, Kramer A (1999) Testing for multiple species in fossil samples: an evaluation and comparison of tests for equal relative variation. Am J Phys Anthropol 108: 507-29.
23. Aiello LC, Collard M, Thackeray JF, et al (2000) Assessing exact randomization-based methods for determining the taxonomic significance of variability in the human fossil record. S Afr J Sci 96: 179-83.
24. Harvati K (2003) Quantitative analysis of Neanderthal temporal bone morphology using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 120: 323-38.
25. Harvati K, Frost SR, Mcnulty KP (2004) Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1147-52.
26. Kramer A (1993) Human taxonomic diversity in the Pleistocene: Does Homo erectus represent multiple hominid species? Am J Phys Anthropol 91: 161-71.
27. Kramer A, Donnelly S, (1998) Species recognition among the robust hominids from Java. In: Sémah F, Falguères C, Grimaud-Hervé D, Sémah AM (eds) Origine des peuplements et chronologie des cultures paléolithiques dans le Sud-est asiatique. Semenanjung-Art'Com, Paris, pp 359-75.
28. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993) A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-32.
29. Harvati K (2003) The Neanderthal taxonomic position: models of intra- and inter-specific craniofacial variation. J Hum Evol 44: 107-32.
30. Bouée S, Detroit F (2008) Diversité taxonomique des hominides fossiles en Asie: de nouvelles méthodes pour une vieille question. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 20: 13-31.
31. Darlu P, Tassy P (1993) La reconstruction phylogénétique: concepts et méthodes, Masson, Paris, 244 p.
32. Zeitoun V (1996) Cladistique et paléoanthropologie: le cas de l'espèce Homo erectus Dubois 1894. Thèse de doctorat de l'université de Bordeaux I, 358 p.
33. Zeitoun V (2000) Révision de l'espèce Homo erectus Dubois, 1893, utilisation des données morphologiques et métriques en cladistique, reconsidération du cas Homo erectus. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 12: 1-200.
34. Poe S, Wiens JJ (2000) Character selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics. In: Wiens JJ (ed) Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London, pp 20-36.
35. Felsenstein J (1973) Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst Zool 22: 240-9.
36. Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K (2003) TNT: tree analysis using new technology. Program and documentation. available at http://www. zmuc. dk/public/phylogeny/tnt.
37. Goloboff P, Mattoni CI, Quinteros AS (2006). Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 24: 774-86.
38. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon K (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774-86.
39. Gonzalez-Jose R, Escapa I, Neves WA, et al (2008) Cladistic analysis of continuous modularized traits provides phylogenetic signals in Homo evolution. Nature 453: 775-8.
40. Dutour O, Hublin JJ, Vandermeersch B (2005) Origine et évolution des populations humaines. Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, 395 p.
41. Shen G, Gao X, Gao B, et al (2009) Age of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus determined with Al/Be Burial Dating. Nature 458: 198-200.
42. http://www-personal. une. edu. au/~pbrown3/gongwang. html. Consulté le 11 juillet 2008.
43. Antón SC (2002) Evolutionary significance of cranial variation in Asian Homo erectus. Am J Phys Anthropol 118: 301-23.
44. Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit Procruste methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. The university of Michigan museum of zoology, Ann Arbor, pp 227-36.
45. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 460 p.
46. The R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www. r-project. org. Consulté le 21 octobre 2007.
47. Dryden I (2006) Shapes: Statistical shape analysis. R package version 1, 10 p.
48. Paradis E, Strimmer K, Claude J, et al (2006) Ape: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution. R package version 1. 8. 4.
49. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, et al (2005) Cluster analysis basics and extensions, unpublished.
50. Felsenstein J (1973) Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am J Hum Genet 10: 193-9.
51. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3. 2). Cladistics 5: 164-6.
52. Kurten B, (1964) The evolution of the polar bear Ursus maritimus. Acta Zool Fenn 108: 1-26.
53. Talbot SL, Shields GF (1996) A phylogeny of the bears ursidae inferred from complete sequences of three mitochondrial genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 5: 567-75.
54. Kosiol C, Goldman N (2005) Different versions of the Dayhoff rate matrix. Mol Biol Evol 22: 193-9.
55. Paradis E (2006) Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 211 p.
56. Hennig W (1950) Grundzüge einer theorie der phylogenetischen systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin, 370 p.
57. Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press Urbana, 280 p.
58. Farris JS (1970) Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst Zool 19: 83-92.
59. Kluge AG, Farris JS (1969) Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 18: 1-32.
60. Lecointre G, Le Guyader H (2006) Classification phylogénétique du vivant, Belin, Paris, 560 p.
61. Lewis PO (2001) Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 30-7.
62. Holder M, Lewis PO (2003) Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nature Rev Gen 4: 275-84.
63. van Dijk MA, Madsen O, Catzeflis F, et al (2001) Protein sequence signatures support the African clade of mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 188-93.
64. Prasad AB, Allard MW (2008) Confirming the phylogeny of mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1795-808.
65. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2009) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2. 72. http://mesquiteproject. org.
66. Adams DC, Rosenberg MS (1998) Partial Warps, A Comment on Fink and Zelditch 1995. Syst Biol 47: 168-73.
67. Rohlf FJ (1998) On Applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst Biol 47: 147-58.
68. Zelditch ML, Finck WL, Swiderski DL, et al (1998) On Applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: a reply to Rohlf. Syst Biol 47: 159-67.
69. Zelditch ML, Finck WL (1998) Partial warps, phylogeny and ontogeny: A reply to Adams and Rosenberg. Syst Biol 47: 345-8.
70. Zelditch MA, Swiderski DL, Fink WL (2000) Discovery of phylogenetic characters in morphometric data. In: Wiens JJ (ed) Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London, pp 37-83.
71. Zelditch ML, Fink WL, Swiderski DL (1995) Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified characters as synapomorphies. Syst Biol 44: 179-89.
72. Rohlf FJ (2002) Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny. In: McLeod N, Forey P (eds) Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, pp 175-93.
73. Mcleod N, Forey PL (2002) Morphology, shape and phylogeny, Taylor & Francis, London, New York, 308 p.
74. Felsenstein J (2002) Quantitative characters, phylogenies and morphometrics. In: McLeod N, Forey P (eds) Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, pp 27-44.
75. Swiderski DL, Zelditch MA, Fink WL (2002) Comparability, morphometrics and phylogeny systematics. In: McLeod N, Forey P (eds) Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, pp 67-99.
76. Rae TC (2002) Scaling, polymorphism and cladistic analysis. In: McLeod N, Forey P (eds) Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor & Francis, London, New York, pp 45-52.
77. Groves CP, Mazak V (1975) An approach to the taxonomy of the Hominidae: gracile Villafranchian hominids of Africa. Cas Mineral Geologii 20: 225-47.
78. Andrews P (1984) An alternative interpretation of the characters used to define Homo erectus. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 69: 167-75.
79. Wood B (1991) Koobi Fora research project, 4: hominid cranial remains, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 466 p.
80. Antón SC (2003) Natural history of Homo erectus. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 46: 126-170.
81. Kidder JH, Durband AC (2004) A re-evaluation of the metric diversity within Homo erectus. J Hum Evol 46: 299-315.
82. Durband A (2006) Craniometric variation within the Pleistocene of Java: The Ngawi 1 cranium. Hum Evol 21: 193-201.
83. Bilsborough A, Wood B (1986) The nature, origin and fate of Homo erectus. In: B. A. Wood, L. Martin, P. Andrews (eds) Major topics in primate and human evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 295-316.
84. Bilsborough A, Wood B (1988) Cranial morphometry of early hominids: facial region. Am J Phys Anthropol 76: 61-86.