A real option-based model for promoting sustainable energy projects under the clean development mechanism

Energy Policy

Volumn 54, Issue , 2013, Pages 360-368

  Lee, Hyounkyu ^a   Park, Taeil ^a   Kim, Byungil ^a   Kim, Kyeongseok ^b   Kim, Hyoungkwan ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b International Business Development Dept   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Clean energy system; Real option

Indexed keywords

CDM PROJECTS; CERTIFIED EMISSION REDUCTIONS; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; CLEAN ENERGY SYSTEMS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; FAIR SHARE; HOST COUNTRIES; MARKET PRICE; MARKET SIZES; REAL OPTIONS; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PROJECTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY POLICY; PROFITABILITY;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING WORLD; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GREENHOUSE GAS; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; PLANNING METHOD; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84873198319     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.050     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Asuri B., Kashani H., Molenaar K.R., Lee S., Liu J. A risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating bot highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2011.
2. Begg K.G. Implementing the Kyoto protocol on climate change: environmental integrity, sinks and mechanisms. Global Environmental Change 2002, 12(4):331-336.
3. Brandao L.E.T., Saraiva E. The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure project. Construction Management and Economics 2008, 26:1171-1180.
4. Carbon Finance State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011 2011, World Bank, Washington DC.
5. Cheah Y.j., Liu J. Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation. Construction Management and Economics 2006, 24:545-554.
6. Chiara N., Garvin M.J., Vecer J. Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2007, 13(2):97-104.
7. Cheng C.-T., Lo S.-L., Lin T.T. Applying real options analysis to assess cleaner energy development strategies. Energy. Policy 2011, 39:5929-5938.
8. Cui Q., Bayraktar M.E., Hastak M., Minkarah I. Use of warranties on highway project: a real option perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering 2004, 20(3):118-125.
9. Cui Q., Johnson P., Quick A., Hastak M. Valuing the warranty ceiling clause on New Mexico Highway 44 using binomial lattice model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2008, 134(1):10-17.
10. De Neufville R., Scholtes S., Wang T. Real option by spreadsheet: parking garage case example. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2006, 12(2):107-111.
11. Ford D.N., Lander D.M., Voyer J.J. A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction project. Construction Management and Economics 2002, 20:343-351.
12. Garvin M.J., Cheah Y.J. Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions. Construction Management and Economic 2003, 22:373-383.
13. Haites E., Yamin F. The clean development mechanism: proposals for its operation and governance. Global Environmental Change 2000, 10(1):27-45.
14. Ho S.P., Liu L.Y. An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics 2002, 20:143-156.
15. Huang Y., Chou S. Valuation of the minimum revenue guarantee and the option to abandon in BOT infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics 2006, 24:379-389.
16. Hui E.C., Ng I.M., Lo K. Analysis of the viability of an urban renewal project under a risk-based option pricing framework. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2011, 137(2):101-111.
17. Kim A. Institutions in conflict? the climate change flexibility mechanisms and the multinational trading system. Global Environmental Change 2001, 11(3):251-255.
18. Kim B., Lim H., Kim H., Hong T.H. Determining the value of governmental subsidies for the installation of clean energy systems as real option. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2012, 138(3):422-430.
19. Kodukula P., Papudesu C. Project Valuation Using Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide 2006, J. Ross Publishing Inc, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
20. 2 efficiency dynamics of key developing countries. Global Environmental Change 2002, 12(2):117-126.
21. Liu J., Cheah C.Y.J. Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation. Construction Management and Economics 2009, 27:331-342.
22. Matsuhashi R., Fujisawa S., Mitamura W., Momobayasgi Y., Yoshida Y. Clean development mechanism projects and portfolio risks. Energy 2004, 29:1579-1588.
23. Mayer Z., Kazakidis V. Decision making in flexible mine production system design using real options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2007, 133(2):169-180.
24. Michaelowa A., Jotzo F. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 2005, 33:511-523.
25. Muller A. How to make the clean development mechanism sustainable-the potential of rent extraction. Energy Policy 2007, 35:3203-3212.
26. Mun J. Real Option Analysis 2005, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
27. Paish O. Small hydro power: technology and current status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002, 6:537-556.
28. Pearson B. Market failure: why the clean development mechanism won't promote clean development. Journal of Cleaner Production 2007, 15:247-252.
29. Sutter C., Parreno J.C. Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM project. Climate Change 2007, 84:75-90.
30. Takahshi, K., Ninomiya, Y., 2011. List of Grid Emission Factors. Grid Emission Factors data, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, (Nov. 7, 2011). http://www.iges.or.jp/en/cdm/report_grid.html.
31. UNCTAD, 2009. Trade and investment opportunities and challenges under the clean development mechanism (CDM). Trade and Development Board, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
32. UNFCCC, 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nation, New York.
33. UNFCCC, 2002. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Marrakesh.
34. Waleij A., Eriksson H., Edlund C., Sundstrom S., Holmberg M., Sandstrom B., Westerdahl K.S., Berglind R., Liljedahl B. Aceh Province: Indonesia Environmental and Health Hazards 2005, FOI Defence Research Agency, Stockholm in Sweden.
35. Zhao T., Sundararahan S.K., Tseug C. Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: a real option approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2004, 10(1):23-32.