When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL-R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic experts

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 527-537

  Rufino, Katrina A ^a   Boccaccini, Marcus T ^a   Hawes, Samuel W ^a   Murrie, Daniel C ^b  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

adversarial allegiance; PCL R; rater agreement; sexually violent predator

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFLICT; CRIME VICTIM; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PEDOPHILIA; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEXUAL CRIME; STATISTICS;

ADULT; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; CHECKLIST; CHILD; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; CRIME VICTIMS; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PEDOPHILIA; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX OFFENSES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84873181473     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0093988     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa870107
2. Bernstein, D. E. (2008). Expert witnesses, adversarial bias, and the (partial) failure of the Daubert Revolution. Iowa Law Review, 93, 101-137.
3. Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., & Murrie, D. C. (2008). Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL-R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 262-283. doi:10.1037/a0014523
4. Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Murrie, D. C., & Rufino, K. A. (in press). Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders? Law and Human Behavior. doi:10.1037/h0093949
5. Brodsky, S. L. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Brodsky, S. L. (1999). The expert expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. DeMatteo, D., & Edens, J. F. (2006). The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 214-241. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.2.214
8. Edens, J. F., Boccaccini, M. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2010). Inter-rater reliability of the PCL-R total and factor scores among psychopathic sex offenders: Are personality features more prone to disagreement than behavioral features? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 106-119. doi:10.1002/bsl.918
9. Grann, M., Langstrom, N., Tengstrom, A., & Stalenheim, E. G. (1998). Reliability of file-based retrospective ratings of psychopathy with the PCL-R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 416-426. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7003-2
10. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual assault recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002
11. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6. 1154
12. Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99-119.
13. Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
14. Hawes, S., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2012, March). Predictive validity of PCL-R scores among sex offenders: Meta-analytic findings. In A. Forth (Chair), Psychopathy and risk decisions: Clinical and legal implications. Symposium accepted for presentation at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Juan, PR.
15. Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sex Abuse, 19, 425-448.
16. Krafka, C., Meghan, A., Dunn, M. A., Johnson, M. T., Cecil, J. S., & Miletich, D. (2002). Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 309-332.
17. Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28-45. doi:10.1007/s10979-007- 9096-6
18. Lloyd, C. D., Clark, H. J., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between Psychopathy Checklist-Revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 323-339. doi: 10.1348/135532509X468432
19. Miller, A. K., Rufino, K. A., Boccaccini, M. T., Jackson, R., & Murrie, D. C. (2011). On individual differences in person perception: Raters' personality traits relate to their Psychopathy Checklist-Revised scoring tendencies. Assessment, 18, 253-260. doi:10.1177/1073191111402460
20. Miller, C. S., Otto, R. K., Kimonis, E. R., Kline, S. M., & Wasserman, A. L. (2011). Reliability of risk assessment measures used in Sexually Violent Predator proceedings. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Mnookin, J. (2008). Expert evidence, partisanship, and epistemic confidence. Brooklyn Law Review, 73, 587-611.
22. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Caperton, J., & Rufino, K. (in press). Field validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in sex offender risk assessment. Psychological Assessment. doi:10.1037/a0026015
23. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Johnson, J. T., & Janke, C. (2008). Does interrater (dis)agreement on psychopathy checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? Law and Human Behavior, 32, 352-362. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9097-5
24. Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 19-53. doi:10.1037/a0014897
25. Otto, R. K. (1989). Bias and expert testimony of mental health professionals in adversarial proceedings: A preliminary investigation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 267-273.
26. Rogers, R. (1987). Ethical dilemmas in forensic evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 5, 149-160.
27. Serin, R. C. (1993). Diagnosis of psychopathology with and without an interview. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 367-372. Texas Heath & Safety Code § 841.023. (2000).
28. Tolman, A. O., & Mullendore, K. B. (2003). Risk evaluations for the courts: Is service quality a function of specialization? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 225-232. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.225
29. Wong, S. (1988). Is Hare's Psychopathy Checklist reliable without the interview? Psychological Reports, 62, 931-934.