Methane capture from livestock manure

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 117, Issue , 2013, Pages 187-207

  Tauseef, S M ^a   Premalatha, M ^a   Abbasi, Tasneem ^a   Abbasi, S A ^a  

^a PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digesters; Global warming; Livestock manure; Methane capture

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FERTILIZERS; GLOBAL WARMING; MANURES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES; ANTHROPOGENICS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENERGY; LIVESTOCK MANURE; METHANE CAPTURE; PRESENT STATUS; SOURCES OF ENERGY;

METHANE;

BIOGAS; CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DEVELOPING WORLD; ENERGY RESOURCE; GLOBAL WARMING; LIVESTOCK; MANURE; METHANE;

ANAEROBIC REACTOR; BATCH REACTOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FIXED FILM REACTOR; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIVESTOCK; MANURE; PH; PLUG FLOW REACTOR; REVIEW; STIRRED REACTOR; TEMPERATURE;

CHINA; INDIA;

EID: 84873169738     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.022     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14:919-937.
2. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Production of clean energy by anaerobic digestion of phytomass - new prospects for a global warming amelioration technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14:1653-1659.
3. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Is the use of renewable energy sources an answer to the problems of global warming and pollution?. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2012, 42:99-154.
4. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Formation and impact of granules in fostering clean energy production and wastewater treatment in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (USAB) reactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16:1696-1708.
5. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C. Generation of biogas from Salvinia molesta (Mitchell) on a commercial biogas digester. Environmental Technology Letters 1984, 5:75-80.
6. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C. Infestation by aquatic weeds of the fern genus Salvinia - its status and control. Environmental Conservation 1986, 13:235-241.
7. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C. Effect of temperature on biogas production from aquatic fern Salvinia. Indian Journal of Technology 1991, 29:306-309.
8. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C. Modelling and Simulation of Biogas Systems Economics 1993, Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi.
9. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C. Potential of aquatic weed Salvinia molesta (Mitchell) for water-treatment and energy recovery. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology 1994, 1:204-213.
10. Abbasi S.A., Ramasami E. Biotechnological Methods of Pollution Control 1999, University Press, New Delhi.
11. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C., Schaumberg G.D. Bioenergy potential of 8 common aquatic weeds. Biological Wastes 1990, 34:359-366.
12. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C., Panholzer M.B. Biogas production from the aquatic weed Pistia (Pistia stratiotes). Bioresource Technology 1991, 37:211-214.
13. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C., Ramasamy E.V. Studies on multiphase anaerobic-digestion of Salvinia. Indian Journal of Technology 1992, 30:483-490.
14. Abbasi S.A., Nipaney P.C., Ramasamy E.V. Use of aquatic weed Salvinia (Salvinia molesta, Mitchell) as full partial feed in commercial biogas digesters. Indian Journal of Technology 1992, 30:451-457.
15. Abbasi T., Tauseef S.M., Abbasi S.A. Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation. An Overview Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16:3228-3242.
16. Abbasi T., Tauseef S.M., Abbasi S.A. Biogas Energy 2012, Springer, New York.
17. Abbasi T., Sanjeevi R., Makhija M. Role of vitamins B-3 and C in the fashioning of granules in UASB reactor sludge. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2012, 167:348-357.
18. Acton Q.A. Advances in Bioengineering Research and Application 2012, Scholarly Editions, Atlanta, Georgia.
19. AFMRC, PAMI A Guide to Swine Manure Management Methods 1997, Alberta Farm Machinery Research Centre (AFMRC) and Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI), Alberta, pp. 1-8.
20. AgSTAR Recovering Value from Waste: Anaerobic Digester System Basics 2011.
21. Ainea E.K. Cylinder Capped Biogas Plants 1992, Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association (BORDA), Germany.
22. Aneja V.P., Schlesinger W.H., Erisman J.W. Effects of agriculture upon the air quality and climate: research, policy, and regulations. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:4234-4240.
23. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K., Deng H., Schmidt J.E. Anaerobic digestion of olive oil mill effluents together with swine manure in UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology 2002, 45:213-218.
24. BAR World's Largest Biomass Plant Running on Chicken Manure Online in the Netherlands 2008, Bureau of Agricultural Research.
25. Baserga U., Egger K., Wellinger A. Biogas from Solid Manure 1994, FAT-Berichte, Switzerland 451, p. 9.
26. Batzias F., Sidiras D., Spyrou E. Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method. Renewable Energy 2005, 30:1161-1176.
27. BIGADAN Maabjerg Bioenergy 2011, BIGADAN, Skanderborg - Denmark.
28. BIGADAN HTN Biogas 2011, BIGADAN, Skanderborg - Denmark.
29. Bracmort K., Ramseur J.L., McCarthy J.E., Folger P., Marples D.J. Methane Capture: Options for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Congressional Research Service 2009.
30. CAEEDAC The Economics of Biogas in the Hog Industry 1999, The Canadian Agricultural Energy End Use Data and Analysis Centre, p. 27.
31. CARE Biogas Digesters 2007, Centre for Application of Renewable Energies.
32. Castrillon L., Vazquez I., Maranon E., Sastre H. Anaerobic thermophilic treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management & Research 2002, 20:350-356.
33. Chanakya H.N., Malayil S. Anaerobic digestion for bioenergy from agro-residues and other solid wastes-an overview of science, technology and sustainability. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 2012, 92:111-143.
34. Chawla O.P. Advances in Biogas Technology 1986, Publications and Information Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
35. Cherosky P., Li Y., Mancl K. Manure to Energy through Anaerobic Digestion 2011, The Ohio State University.
36. Chhabra A., Manjunath K., Panigrahy S., Parihar J. Spatial pattern of methane emissions from Indian livestock. Current Science 2009, 96:683-689.
37. Cowan M.K., Talaro K.P. Microbiology: a Systems Approach 2009, McGraw-Hill.
38. Daisy A., Kamaraj S. The impact and treatment of night soil in anaerobic digester: a review. Journal of Microbial and Biochemical Technology 2011, 3:43-50.
39. De Baere L. Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste: State-of-the-art 2000, pp. 283-290.
40. De Baere L. Will Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste Survive in the Future? 2006, pp. 187-194.
41. Deparine S. GE to Run the World's Biggest Biogas Plant 2010, Asian Biofuels Hub, Inc.
42. Deublein D., Steinhauser A. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: an Introduction 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Germany.
43. Dong L., Zhenhong Y., Yongming S. Semi-dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of water sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste (WS-OFMSW). Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:2722-2728.
44. FAO Livestock Report 2006, Food and Agricultre Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p. 85.
45. FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2012.
46. FAPRI U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook 2010, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Iowa State University, and University of Missouri-Columbia., Ames, Iowa.
47. Galagan J.E., Nusbaum C., Roy A., Endrizzi M.G., Macdonald P., FitzHugh W., Calvo S., Engels R., Smirnov S., Atnoor D. The genome of M. acetivorans reveals extensive metabolic and physiological diversity. Genome Research 2002, 12:532-542.
48. Gautam R., Baral S., Herat S. Biogas as a sustainable energy source in Nepal: present status and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13:248-252.
49. Guendouz J., Buffière P., Cacho J., Carrère M., Delgenes J.P. Dry anaerobic digestion in batch mode: design and operation of a laboratory-scale, completely mixed reactor. Waste Management 2010, 30:1768-1771.
50. Hein T. Canadian Bio-digester Report - Manure Management Magazine 2011, Annex Publishing & Printing Inc.
51. Holm-Nielsen J.B., Al Seadi T., Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:5478-5484.
52. Hoyt S. Methane Production from a Pilot-scale Fixed Film Anaerobic Digester and Plug-flow Digester Loaded with High-solid Manure 2000, The Vermont Department of Public Service.
53. IEA Operating Anaerobic Digestion Plants of Commercial Scale 2008, International Energy Agency.
54. Indiastat.com Animal Husbandry/Livestock 2012, Datanet India Pvt. Ltd.
55. Itodo I., Agyo G., Yusuf P. Performance evaluation of a biogas stove for cooking in Nigeria. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 2007, 18:15.
56. JianZheng L., Jha A., JunGuo H., QiaoYing B., Sheng C., Peng W. Assessment of the effects of dry anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with waste water sludge on biogas yield and biodegradability. International Journal of Physical Sciences 2011, 6:3679-3688.
57. Kalyuzhnyi S., Fedorovich V., Nozhevnikova A. Anaerobic treatment of liquid fraction of hen manure in UASB reactors. Bioresource Technology 1998, 65:221-225.
58. Khanal S.K. Anaerobic Biotechnology for Bioenergy Production: Principles and Applications 2008, Wiley-Blackwell.
59. Khoiyangbam R.S., Gupta N., Kumar S. Biogas Technology: Towards Sustainable Development 2011, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi.
60. Kishore V.V.N., Raman P., Rao V.V.R. Fixed Dome Biogas Plants. A Design, Construction and Operation Manual 1987, Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.
61. Koneswaran G., Nierenberg D. Global farm animal production and global warming: impacting and mitigating climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives 2008, 116:578-582.
62. Kumar J.A., Junguo H., Jianzheng L., Guocheng Z. Effect of Substrate Concentration on Methane Fermentation of Cattle Dung 2010, International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering (CESCE), 2010 IEEE, China, 512-515.
63. Kumar J.A., Jianzheng L., Junguo H., Sheng C. Optimization of Dry Anaerobic Fermentation of Solid Organic Wastes 2010, pp. 740-743.
64. Kuroshima M., Misaki T., Ishibashi T. Dry anaerobic treatment of livestock waste together with municipal solid waste [C]. Proceedings of 9th World Congress, Antwerpen, Belgium 2001, 375-380.
65. Kuusinen K., Valo R. Maatalousjatteiden kuivafermentaatio 1987, Loppuraportti DN-BIOPROCESSING, OY, Helsinki.
66. KVIC Khadi and Village Industries Commission 2011, Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Government of India.
67. Levenspiel O. Chemical Reaction Engineering 1999, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
68. Lichtfouse E., Schwarzbauer J., Robert D. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World: Remediation of Air and Water Pollution 2011, Springer, New York.
69. Linke B., Miersch S., Gegner M. Trockenvergärung im Siloschlauch. 11th Annual Meeting of Fachverband Biogas: BIOGAS - the Universal Energy of Tomorrow 2002, 70-80. Fachverband Biogas e.V., Freising and Verein fuer Bioenergie e.V., Borken, Borken, Germany.
70. Liu G., Peng X., Long T. Advance in high-solid anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Journal-Central South University of Technology (English Edition) 2006, 13:151.
71. Maranon E., Castrillon L., Vázquez I., Sastre H. The influence of hydraulic residence time on the treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management & Research 2001, 19:436-441.
72. Maranon E., Castrillon L., Fernández J.J., Fernández Y., Peláez A.I., Sanchez J. Anaerobic mesophilic treatment of cattle manure in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor with prior pasteurization. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2006, 56:137-143.
73. Marchaim U. Biogas Process for Sustainable Development, Italy 1992.
74. Mazumdar A. Consolidation of Information: Biogas Handbook 1982, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
75. Metcalf, Eddy Wastewater Engineering: Treatment & Reuse 2004, McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt Limited, New Delhi.
76. Mital K.M. Biogas Systems: Policies, Progress And Prospects 1997, New Age International (P) Limited, New Delhi.
77. MNRE Booklets on Renewable Energy 2012, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy.
78. MNRE Probable Questions for Biogas Programme 2012, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy.
79. Mumme J. Dry fermentation in a small-scale batch installation. Landtechnik 2003, 58:330-331.
80. MWH National Master Plan for Development of Waste-to-Energy in India 2003, Technical Memorandum on Waste-to-Energy Technologies.
81. Nelson C., Lamb J. Final Report: Haubenschild Farms Anaerobic Digester 2002, The Minnesota Project 2002, p. 39.
82. Nelson C., Lamb J. Final Report: Haubenschild Farms Anaerobic Digester 2002, College of Agricultural Sciences, Penn State, Minnesota, p. 35.
83. Nijaguna B.T. Biogas Technology 2006, New Age International, New Delhi.
84. OWS Evaluatie van de vergisters in Nederland 2011, Organic Waste Systems, NV, Utrecht, p. 16.
85. O'Flaherty V., Collins G., Mahony T. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural residues. Environmental Microbiology 2009, 259-280. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey. R. Mitchell, J.-D. Gu (Eds.).
86. Pavan P., Battistoni P., Mata-Alvarez J., Cecchi F. Performance of thermophilic semi-dry anaerobic digestion process changing the feed biodegradability. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research 2000, 41:75.
87. Raman P., Rao V., Kishore V. A static scum-breaking net for fixed-dome biogas plants. Biological Wastes 1989, 30:261-273.
88. Ramasamy E.V., Abbasi S.A. Utilization of biowaste solids by extracting volatile fatty acids with subsequent conversion to methane and manure. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management 1999, 26:133-139.
89. Ramasamy E.V., Abbasi S.A. High-solids anaerobic digestion for the recovery of energy from municipal solid waste (MSW). Environmental Technology 2000, 21:345-349.
90. Ramasamy E.V., Abbasi S.A. Energy recovery from dairy waste-waters: impacts of biofilm support systems on anaerobic CST reactors. Applied Energy 2000, 65:91-98.
91. Ramasamy E.V., Abbasi S.A. Enhancement in the treatment efficiency and conversion to energy of dairy wastewaters by augmenting CST Reactors with simple biofilm support systems. Environmental Technology 2001, 22:561-565.
92. Ramasamy E.V., Gajalakshmi S., Sanjeevi R., Jithesh M.N., Abbasi S.A. Feasibility studies on the treatment of dairy wastewaters with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Bioresource Technology 2004, 93:209-212.
93. Rapport, J., Zhang, R.J., Jenkins, B.M., Williams, R.B., 2008. Current Anaerobic Digestion Technologies Used for Treatment of Municipal Organic Solid Waste. Contractor Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA.
94. RCSD Biogas Manual 2012, Resources Centre for Sustainable Development.
95. Rico C., Rico J.L., Muñoz N., Gómez B., Tejero I. Effect of mixing on biogas production during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of screened dairy manure in a pilot plant. Engineering in Life Sciences 2011, 11:476-481.
96. Rosenzweig A., Ragsdale S.W. Methods in Methane Metabolism: Methanogenesis 2011, Elsevier/Academic Press, USA.
97. Sasse L., Kellner C., Kimaro A. Improved Biogas Unit for Developing Countries 1991, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig, Germany, p. 84.
98. Schäfer, W., Lehto, M., Teye, F., 2006. Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Residues On-farm - a Feasibility Study. Agrifood Research Reports. Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists, p. 100.
99. Shah S.A. Energy Scenario and Options for China. China Postgraduate Network Conference, Manchester 2009.
100. Shukla A.R. Policy development requirements for biogas upscaling in India, Delhi. International Renewable Energy Conference (DIREC) | Workshop on Bio-methanation - Upscaling challenges and opportunities, New Delhi 2010.
101. Singh S.P., Prerna P. Review of recent advances in anaerobic packed-bed biogas reactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13:1569-1575.
102. Singh M., Srivastava R.K. Sequencing batch reactor technology for biological wastewater treatment: a review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering 2011, 6:3-13.
103. SNV Production Rate of Biogas Plants Increased 2012.
104. Soni S.K. Microbes: a Source of Energy for 21st Century 2007, New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi.
105. The Himalayan Times Pragati Biogas Centre Installs 13,000 Plants 2012.
106. Thien Thu C.T., Cuong P.H., Hang L.T., Chao N.V., Anh L.X., Trach N.X., Sommer S.G. Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries - using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 27:64-71.
107. Thornton P.K. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 365:2853-2867.
108. Tiwari G.N., Mishra R.K. Advanced Renewable Energy Sources 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry, UK.
109. TPUB Alternative Fuels CD ROM 07 2007, Integrated Publishing.
110. Umesh B.V. Biogas the MCRC Way 1981, Shri AMM Murugappa Research Centre, Madras.
111. UN Renewable Energy Technologies for Rural Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2010, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
112. 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990-2020 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
113. USEPA Sources and Emissions | Methane | Climate Change | U.S. EPA 2011, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
114. 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990-2030 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
115. USEPA U.S. Anaerobic Digester Status: a 2011 Snapshot 2011, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
116. van Eekert M.H.A., van Dooren H.J., Lexmond M., Zeeman G. Wastewater and manure. Methane and Climate Change 2010, 154. Earthscan, London. P. Smith, D. Reay, A. van van Amstel (Eds.).
117. Wang J. Introduction of PUXIN biogas plant. PUXIN Biogas Plant, China 2012, Personal Communication (Ed.).
118. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010, 85:849-860.
119. Wiedemann S., McGahan E., Grist S., Grant T. Environmental Assessment of Two Pork Supply Chains Using Life Cycle Assessment 2010, Rural Industries Reseach and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT, Australia.
120. Wilke A.C. Anaerobic Digestion of Flushed Dairy Manure, Anaerobic Digester Technology Applications in Animal Agriculture - a National Summit 2003, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 350-354.
121. Wilkie A.C. Anaerobic digestion: holistic bioprocessing of animal manures. Animal Residuals Management Conference 2000, 1-12. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia.
122. Wilkie A.C. Reducing dairy manure odor and producing energy. BioCycle 2000, 41:48-50.
123. Wilkie A.C. Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure: Design and Procedure Considerations. Dairy Manure Management: Treatment, Handling, and Community Relations 2005, New York, pp. 301-312.
124. Yetilmezsoy K., Sakar S. Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 153:532-543.
125. Zhang R., Gikas P., Zhu B., Lord J., Choate C., Rapport J., El-Mashad H., Jenkins B. Integration of Rotary Drum Reactor and Anaerobic Digestion Technologies for Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste 2010, California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, California.