Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries - Using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 27, Issue , 2012, Pages 64-71

  Thien Thu, Cu Thi ^a   Cuong, Pham Hung ^b   Hang, Le Thuy ^b   Chao, Nguyen Van ^c   Anh, Le Xuan ^d   Trach, Nguyen Xuan ^a   Sommer, Sven G ^e  

^a VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Viet Nam)

^b National Institute of Animal Sciences   (Viet Nam)

^c HUE UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

^d Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development   (Viet Nam)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biogas; Developing countries; Manure management; Pig production

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MANURE; BIOGAS DIGESTERS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DIGESTATE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTIONS; LIQUID FRACTION; LIQUID MANURE; LIVESTOCK MANURE; MANURE MANAGEMENT; PIG PRODUCTION; RETENTION TIME; SOLID FRACTION; TECHNICAL SUPPORT; VIET NAM;

BIOGAS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FARMS; LIQUIDS; MANAGEMENT; METHANE; POLLUTION CONTROL; PULP DIGESTERS; SEPARATION; SURVEYS;

MANURES;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 84856190071     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. A. Albihn, and B. Vinners Biosecurity and arable use of manure and biowaste - Treatment alternatives Livest. Sci. 112 2007 232 239 (Pubitemid 350137940)
2. B. Amigun, and H. von Blottnitz Capital cost prediction for biogas installations in Africa: Lang factor approach Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 28 2009 134 142
3. B.X. An, and T.R. Preston Gas production from pig manure fed in different loading rates to polyethylene tubular biodigesters Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 11 1999
4. Anonymous, 2010a. Press conference on Ashden Award in Vietnam 12/7/2010. (http://biogas.org.vn/english/Tin-tuc-Su-kien/Tin-hoat-dong/Le-cong-bo-giai- thuong-Ashden-Award-ngay-12-7-2010.aspx. access date: 4.12.11).
5. Anonymous Kiem soat o nhiem tai cac vung dong dan cu ngheo Environmentally Sustainable Development in Poor Urban Areas 2010 Vietnam-Denmark cooperation development in the Environment http://www.niaslinc.dk/gateway-to- asia/nordic-webpublications/x506033537.pdf access date: 4.12.11
6. Anonymous Summary of the Biogas Program for Animal Husbandry sector of Vietnam 2011 http://biogas.org.vn/english/getattachment/Tin-tuc-Su-kien/Tin- hoat-dong/Biogas-Programme-for-the-Animal-Husbandry-Sector-o/BP-Summary-Eng.pdf. aspx access date 15.12.11
7. E.R. Campagnolo, K.R. Johnson, A. Karpati, C.S. Rubin, D.W. Kolpin, M.T. Meyer, J.E. Esteban, and M.A. McGeehin Antimicrobial residues in animal waste and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations Sci. Total Environ. 299 2002 89 95 (Pubitemid 35287490)
8. Y. Chen, G. Yang, S. Sweeney, and Y. Feng Household biogas use in rural China: a study of opportunities and constraints Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 14 2010 545 549
9. P. Eriksson, and M. Olsson The Potential of Biogas as Vehicle Fuel in Europe-as Technological Innovation Systems Analysis of the Emerging Bio-Methane Technology 2007 Chalmers University of Technology Report No 6, ISSN: 1404-8167
10. General Statistic Office Of Vietnam Vietnam Population and Housing Census 2009 Website 2009 http://www.gso.gov.vn/default-en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid= 5&ItemID=11082 access date: 15.12.11
11. C.P. Gerba, and J.E. Smith Jr. Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of waste J. Environ. Qual. 34 1 2004 42 48 (Pubitemid 40130040)
12. P. Gerber, P. Chilonda, G. Franceschini, and H. Menzi Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia Bioresource Technol. 96 2005 263 276 (Pubitemid 39286116)
13. N. Gollehon, M. Caswell, M. Ribaudo, R. Kellogg, C. Lander, and D. Letson Confined Animal Production and Manure Nutrients Agriculture Information Bulltin No 771 2001 Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib771/aib771.pdf
14. H.L. Jackson, and E.J. Mtengeti Assessment of animal manure production, management and utilization in Southern Highlands of Tanzania Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 17 10 2005
15. X. Jiang, S.G. Sommer, and K.V. Christensen A review of the biogas industry in China Energy Policy 39 2011 6073 6081
16. M. Lantz, M. Svensson, L. Bjornsson, and P. Borjesson The prospects for an expension of biogas systems in Sweden-Incentives, barriers and potentials Energ. Policy 35 3 2007 1830 1843 (Pubitemid 44858165)
17. F.P. Lekule, and N.C. Kyvsgaard Improving pig husbandry in tropical resource-poor communities and its potential to reduce risk of porcine cysticercosis Acta Trop. 87 2003 111 117 (Pubitemid 36629490)
18. S. Maithel Biomass Energy. Resource of Assessment Handbook 2009 Solution Centre for Renewable Energy Cooperation Network for the Asia Pacific Asian and Pacific. Centre for Transfer of Technology http://recap.apctt.org/Docs/Biomass. pdf
19. J. Martinez, F. Guiziou, P. Peu, and V. Gueutier Influence of treatment techniques for pig slurry on methane emissions during subsequent storage Biosyst. Eng. 85 2003 347 354 (Pubitemid 36784888)
20. D.I. Masse, R.L. Droste, K.J. Kennedy, N.K. Patni, and J.A. Munroe Potential for the psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of swine manure using a sequencing batch reactor Can. Agr. Eng. 39 1997 25 33
21. Mi, Z.; 2008. Financing of domestic biogas plants in China. The International Workshop on Financing of Domestic Biogas Plants, pp. 22-23.
22. J.W. Mwirigi, P.M. Makenzi, and W.O. Ochola Socio-economic constraints to adoption and sustainability of biogas technology by farmers in Nakuru Districts, Kenya Energ. Sust. Dev. 13 2009 108 115
23. H.B. Møller, G.S. Sommer, and B.K. Ahring Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure Biomass Bioenerg. 26 2004 485 495 (Pubitemid 38215109)
24. A. Nguyen Economic Benefits from Using Biogas Composite Tank 2010 Ministry of industry and Trade-National program on energy efficiency and conservation http://tietkiemnangluong.com.vn/en/hot-news/economic-benefits-from- using-composite-biogas-tank-42003-9019.html access date: 4.12.11
25. O. Oenema Governmental policies and measures regulating nitrogen and phosphorus from animal manure in European agiculture J. Anim. Sci. 82 2004 E196 E206
26. S.O. Petersen, S.G. Sommer, F. Béline, C. Burton, J. Dach, J.Y. Dourmad, A. Leip, T. Misselbrook, F. Nicholson, H.D. Poulsen, G. Provolo, P. Sørensen, B. Vinners, A. Weiske, M.P. Bernal, R. Böhm, C. Juhász, and R. Mihelic Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspective Livest. Sci. 112 2007 180 191 (Pubitemid 350148185)
27. T.V. Ramachandra, and B.V. Shruthi Spatial mapping of renewable energy potential Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11 2007 1460 1480 (Pubitemid 46357632)
28. M. Ribaudo, N. Gollehon, M. Aillery, J. Kaplan, R. Johansson, J. Agapoff, L. Christensen, V. Breneman, and M. Peters Manure Management for Water Quality: Cost to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land Agriculture Economic Report 824 2003 Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Resource Economics Division http://www.ers.usda.gov/ publications/aer824/aer824fm.pdf
29. K.A. Smith, A.J. Brewer, A. Dauven, and D.W. Wilson A survey of the production and use of animal manures in England and Wales. I. Pig manure Soil Use Manage. 16 2000 124 132 (Pubitemid 30597818)
30. S.G. Sommer, S.O. Petersen, and H.B. Møller Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2004 69,143 69,154
31. S.G. Sommer, G. Mathanpaal, and T. Dass A simple biofilter for treatment of pig slurry in Malaysia Environ. Technol. 26 2005 303 312 (Pubitemid 40613939)
32. B. Teune The Biogas Programe in Vietnam; Amazing Results in Poverty Reduction and Economic Development Boilling Point 53 2007 http://www.docstoc. com/docs/42581979/The-Biogas-Programme-in-Vietnam-Amazing-results-in-poverty access date: 4.12.11
33. B. Teune Vietnam Biogas Program - Making Money Out of Green House Gas Reduction by Sustainable Development 2008 http://biogas.org.vn/english/Tin-tuc- Su-kien/Tin-hoat-dong/Chuong-trinh-khi-sinh-hoc-Viet-Nam-voi-doanh-thu-tu-giam- phat-thai-khi-nha-kinh-thong-qua-phat-trien-ben-vung.aspx access date: 4.12.11
34. S. Thy, T.R. Preston, and J. Ly Effect of retention time on gas production and fertilizer value of biodigester effluent Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 15 7 2003 http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/7/sant157.htm
35. V.D. Tuan, V. Porphyre, J.L. Farinet, and T.D. Toan Composition of animal manure and co-products V. Porphyre, N.Q. Coi, Pig Production Development, Animal Waste Management and Environmental Protection: A Case Study in Thai Binh Province 2006 Northern Vietnam PRISE Publication France 127 143
36. P. Vindis, B. Mursec, M. Janzekovic, and F. Cus The impact of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion on biogas production J. Achievement Mater. Manufacturing Eng. 36 2009 192 198
37. T.K.V. Vu, M.T. Tran, and T.T.S. Dang A survey of manure management on pig farms in Northern Vietnam Livest. Sci. 112 2007 288 297 (Pubitemid 350137944)
38. P.N. Walekhwa, J. Mugisha, and L. Drake Biogas energy from family-size digesters in Uganda: critical factors and policy implications Energy Policy 37 2009 2754 2762
39. X. Wang Diffuse pollution from livestock production in China Chin. J. Geochem. 2 2 2005 189 193 10.1007/BF02841165 (Pubitemid 40990044)
40. W. Xiaohua, and L. Jingfei Influence of using household biogas digesters on household energy consumption in rural areas- a case study in Lianshui in China Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 9 2005 229 236
41. W. Xiaohua, D. Chonglan, H. Xiaoyan, W. Weiming, J. Xiaoping, and J. Sangyun The influence of using biogas digesters on family energy consumption and its economic benefit in rural areas-comparative study between Lianshui and Guichi in China Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 11 2007 1018 1024 (Pubitemid 44820965)
42. G. Zeeman, K. Sutter, T. Vens, M. Koster, and A. Wellinger Psychrophilic digestion of dairy cattle and pig manure: start-up procedures of batch, fed-batch and CSTR-type digesters Biol. Wastes 26 1988 15 31