Five different types of framing effects in medical situation: A preliminary exploration

Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Peng, Jiaxi ^a   Li, Hongzheng ^b   Miao, Danmin ^a   Feng, Xi ^a   Xiao, Wei ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The 303rd Hospital of PLA   (China)

Author keywords

Framing effect; Medical decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FRAMING EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84873169117     PISSN: 20741804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.8469     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453-8.
2. Kuo FY, Hsu CW, Day RF. An exploratory study of cognitive effort involved in decision under Framing-an application of the eye-tracking technology. Decis Support Syst. 2009;48(1):81-91.
3. Huang Y, Wang L. Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010;48(5):649-53.
4. Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. J Behav Decis Making 2005;18(1):1-27.
5. Pochon JB, Riis J, Sanfey AG, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. Functional imaging of decision conflict. J Neurosci. 2008;28(13):3468-73.
6. Gamliel E, Peer E. Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles. Judgment and Decision Making. 2010;5(1):11-20.
7. Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Fitzgerald G, Putt M, Ubel PA. Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves. Med Decis Making. 2002;22(1):76-83.
8. Kühberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998;75(1):23-55.
9. Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998;76(2):149-88.
10. Levin IP, Gaeth GJ, Schreiber J, Lauriola M. A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2002;88(1):411-29.
11. Frisch D. Reasons for framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1993.
12. Wong KFE, Kwong JYY. Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference reversals owing to number size framing. Organ Behav Hum Dec 2005;98(1):54-65.
13. Bigman CA, Cappella JN, Hornik RC. Effective or ineffective: attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Patient Educ Couns. [Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. 2010;81 Suppl:S70-6.
14. Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J Pers Soc Psychol. [Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.]. 2007;92(5):938-56.
15. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
16. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol. 1984;39(4):341.
17. Jackson SE, Dutton JE. Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin Sci Quart. 1988:370-87.
18. Highhouse S, Paese PW. Problem domain and prospect frame: Choice under opportunity versus threat. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1996;22(2):124-32.
19. Thomas JB, Clark SM, Gioia DA. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Acad Manage J. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]. 1993;36(2):239-70.