Towards guidance for assessment of "training" as a performance-shaping factor in human reliability analysis

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 3642-3651

  Skjerve, Ann Britt ^a   Bye, Andreas ^a  

^a OECD HALDEN REACTOR PROJECT   (Norway)

Author keywords

Human reliability analysis; Performance shaping factor; Training assessment

Indexed keywords

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN ERRORS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN RELIABILITY; HUMAN-RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE BASED; PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; PERFORMANCE-SHAPING FACTOR; PROBABILISTIC RISK; SIMULATOR TRAINING; SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT; TRAINING ASSESSMENT; TRAINING MATERIAL; TRAINING PROGRAM;

ELECTRONIC MAIL; PERSONNEL TRAINING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84873160744     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Nuclear Power Plant Personnel Training and its Evaluation. Technical Reports Series no. 380, IAEA, Vienna, 1996.
2. International Atomic Energy Agency. A systematic approach to human performance improvement in nuclear power plants: Training solutions, IAEA-TECDOC-1204, IAEA, Vienna, 2001.
3. Gertman D I, Hallbert B P, Parrish M W, Sattision M B, Brownson D and Tortorelli J P. Review of Findings for Human Performance Contribution to Risk in Operating Events. NUREG/CR-6753, INEEL/EXT-01-01166, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 2002.
4. Hirschberg S. CSNI Technical Opinion Papers No. 4, Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants. NEA No. 5068, OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, 2004.
5. Kirwan B. A Guide to practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor & Francis, London, 1994.
6. Bell J and Holroyd J. Review of human reliability assessment methods. (Research Report RR679), Health and Safety Executive, UK, 2009.
7. Department of Employment. Glossary of training terms. 2nd edition. HMSO, London (Sec.ref. Patrick, 1992), 1971.
8. Williams J C, (1986) HEART - A proposed method for assessing and reducing human error. In: Proceedings of the 9th Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium, University of Bradford, UK, 2-4 April, 1986, pp B3/R/1-B/3/R/13.
9. Hollnagel E., Cognitive reliability and error analysis method CREAM, Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998.
10. NUREG-1624. Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA), NUREG-1624, Rev. 1, USNRC, Washington, D.C., May 2000.
11. Bieder C, Le Bot P, Desmares E, Cara F, Bonnet J L. MERMOS: EDF's New Advanced HRA Method. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 4, New York, USA, September 13- 18, 1998.
12. Lois E, Dang V N, Forester J, Broberg H, Massaiu S, Hildebrandt M., Braarud P O, Parry G, Julius J, Boring R, Mannisto I, Bye A. International HRA Empirical Study Phase 1 Report - Description of Overall Approach and Pilot Phase Results from Comparing HRA Methods to Simulator Performance Data. HWR-844, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Halden, Norway and NUREG/IA-0216, Vol. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 2009.
13. Bye A, Lois E, Dang V N, Parry G, Forester J, Massaiu S, Boring R, Braarud P O, Broberg H, Julius J, Mannisto I, Nelson P. The International HRA Empirical Study - Phase 2 Report - Results From Comparing HRA Methods Predictions to HAMMLAB Simulator Data on SGTR Scenarios, HWR- 915, 2010 and NUREG/IA-0216 Vol. 2, 2011.
14. Dang V N, Forester J, Boring R, Broberg H, Massaiu S, Julius J, Mannisto I, Liao H, Nelson P, Lois E, Bye A. The International HRA Empirical Study - Phase 3 Report - Results from Comparing HRA Methods Predictions to HAMMLAB Simulator Data on LOFW Scenarios, HWR-951, 2011. To be issued as NUREG/IA-0216 Vol. 3.
15. Forester J A, Lois E, Dang V N, Bye A, Boring R L. Conclusions on Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Methods from the International HRA Empirical Study. Proc. PSAM11&ESREL2012, June 25-29, Helsinki, Finland, 2012.
16. Kirkpatrick D L. Evaluating Training Programmes: The Four Levels. 2.ed. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, California, 1998.
17. Bye A, Dang V N, Forester J A, Hildebrandt M, Marble J, Liao H, Lois E. Overview and Preliminary Results of the US Empirical HRA Benchmarking Study. Proc. PSAM11&ESREL2012, June 25-29, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
18. Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), (77-101), 2006.
19. Swain A D. Accident Sequence Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, NUREG/CR-4772/SAND86-1996, Sandia National Laboratories, prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D C, 1987.
20. Gertman D, Blackman H, Marble J, Byers J and Smith C. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR-6883. Idaho National Laboratory, prepared for U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D C, 2005.